by Jeff Huber
“Obama from the Bullpen” discussed how the president-elect’s edict that the U.S. will not keep permanent bases in Iraq helped avert Cold War II, but he has far to go to fix all of the foreign relations fiascos he’s about to inherit. “Puckered Persians” addresses how Obama needs to handle the Iran piece of the puzzle.
The neocons may have lost the election but they still own the narrative. For nearly a decade they’ve repeated their message of messianic fear and loathing through Rupert Murdoch’s Big Brother Broadcast and the compliant mainstream media over and over and over and over until that’s what everybody says so it must be true.
One has to wonder, then, how much of the neocon line on Iran Barack Obama had swallowed when he said at his first post election press conference that, “Iran’s development of a nuclear weapon I believe is unacceptable. We have to mount an international effort to prevent that from happening.”
Our intelligence services say that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in fall of 2003. I’m not convinced they ever had one at all, exactly. The Russians didn’t start building Iran’s first nuclear reactor until fall of 2002. It’s hard to say how much of a nuclear weapons program they could have developed in a year starting from scratch, but it couldn’t have amounted to the program my dogs have going on in the back yard.
The International Atomic Energy Agency has stated for years that it has not found evidence that Iran is developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has stated for years that it is not developing a nuclear weapon and has no intention to. The only people making boo noise about “Iran’s relentless pursuit of nuclear weapons” are knot heads repeating the disinformation propaganda that originated in Dick Cheney’s Iran Directorate, a special task force designed to instigate war with Iran the same way Cheney’s Office of Special Plans and the White House Iraq Group pulled the intelligence shake and bake and the media hoax that sold us on the invasion of Iraq.
And as historian and journalist Gareth Porter recently reported, those “smoking laptop” documents that the Cheney Gang claimed maybe kinda sorta indicated Iran has a nuclear weapons program were maybe kinda sorta forged.
Iran has ballistic missiles that maybe kinda sorta work and maybe kinda might reach Israel. But without nuclear warheads, ballistic missiles are just real expensive mortar rounds, even if you put bugs or gas in the nosecone.
Iran’s conventional forces can’t project power against Israel. Its army has never operated more than ten miles from its border, and that was in the only war Iran ever fought, one that Iraq started by invading Iran, by the way. (Iran never invaded anybody, which is a lot more than you can say for, um, Israel-yay.) Iran’s antique air force would shoot itself down or run out of gas before it got halfway across the Persian Gulf, and its coast guard of a navy would sink of natural causes before it reached the Red Sea. Their navy might be able to close the Strait of Hormuz for a little while, but not to the extent that a barrel of oil would cost the same as a B-2 stealth bomber. They might be able to embarrass our Navy, if they get lucky. A torpedo up the prop locker of a Nimitz class aircraft carrier might put it out of action for the duration; we might even have to tow one of those behemoths all the way home. It’s pretty near impossible to sink a carrier, though. The Klingons might be able to pull it off, but like Iran’s nuclear weapons program, the Klingons don’t actually exist.
Bush administration highfaluters, including General David Petraeus, have for almost two years accused Iran of arming and funding Iraqi militias, but they have yet to produce a shred of real evidence to back up their claims. Ironically, though, what Obama refers to as the “brilliant job” Petraeus has done in Iraq largely consisted of handing out guns and money to militias. Plus, by virtue of having brokered a peace deal between Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki and cleric and militia leader Muqtada al Sadr, Iran is primarily responsible for the reduced levels of violence in Iran that Petraeus gets credit for.
Less than 10 percent of is Iran is arable. The rest is mainly mountain and desert. Iran’s population and infrastructure are gathered in eight major cities. If Iran ever were to acquire a nuclear weapon and put it in a ballistic missile and launch it at someone, the retaliation would effectively end the 6,000-year old Persian civilization in the course of an afternoon.
In a May speech in Montana, Obama said “Iran, they spend one one-hundredth of what we spend on the military. If Iran ever tried to pose a serious threat to us, they wouldn’t stand a chance.” Remarkably, in that same speech, he called Iran a “grave threat.”
We might reasonably conclude that back in May, when he was still running against McCain, he was throwing a bone to the neocons and the Pavlov’s dogs of war that still buy their agenda. But why is he making scary sounds about Iran now? Out of habit? Because it’s a grand tradition for America’s politicians to pander to its warmongers?
I’m about fed up with that kind of bull plop. I voted for change, didn’t you?
Next: the central front of the Second Cold War with the Axis of Energy.
Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes at Pen and Sword . Jeff’s novel Bathtub Admirals (Kunati Books), a lampoon on America’s rise to global dominance, is on sale now. Also catch Scott Horton’s interview with Jeff at Antiwar Radio.
President-elect Obama is a pragmatist… his domestic agenda, which is paramount, requires billions. We are tapped out with our creditors…yesterday the Chinese sent us another memo.
that should be taken seriously because they control the fate of the U.S.dollar.
there are already signs of a shift to a new foreign policy on Iran and Af/Pak – watch the walk not the talk:
I have known any number of highly successful minority people…successful within the majority system, especially in academia which is just politics writ small.
And I do not just mean people of color.
(Attributed to Henry Kissinger):
This is a logical tactic for a minority member of any system. Make waves and you are considered a barbarian.
Go along to get along? You’re OK if you have useful talents.
Go along to get along AND actually get something done?
Genius, as far as I am concerned.
So far, all Obama has really “gotten done” is get elected.
So far…he’s OK.
Talents? You BETCHA.
Now comes the hard part.
He will most likely go with whatever tactics got him this far. That’s an old truism in sports, and with the exception of the rare genius like Muhammad Ali who could invent entirely new tactics that worked…rope-a-dope being his masterpiece, although eventually it injured him deeply in a physical sense…it works up and down the system.
If those tactics do not work?
Will he stand up and give ’em hell?
We shall see.
Soon.
Bet on it.
AG
Gradualist?
The more things change, the more things stay the same.
Unemployment’s at 6.5% right now. This time next year, it’ll be 8.5% on the way up to double digits in early 2010.
You gotta figure every tenth of a percentage point above that 6.5% is going to cost the Dems 2 House seats, and every 3 tenths a Senate seat in the mid-terms.
That is unless Obama can get the narrative OFF the economy. I like the guy. I want him to succeed. But all these Clintonistas all over the transition team means Clinton-style solutions to problems. And even Clinton thought Bosnia, Somalia, and lobbing a few missiles at Saddam were good ideas.
The question is what will Obama do to get the narrative off the economy before November 2010? He has a quite a few choices. He can fix the economy. He can capture Bin Laden. He can end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring the troops home.
Or he can pull some pages out of the tried and true “Wartime President” playbook.
Whatever he does, it’s going to have to be big. Because if we’re still talking about unemployment numbers, bailouts, broken banks, the dead dollar, the markets in the toilet and which industries are going under in America 18 months from now, then Obama and the Dems are done.
He doesn’t have time to be a gradualist. He has 18 months, 20, tops.
We’ll go from “Change we can believe in” to “You know, Bush wasn’t so bad after all” stories from the Village.
And we’ll go right back to GOP-land.
After 8 years of nothing happening, America needs results. Barry has to deliver on a deadline. Is it fair? Hell no, not in the least. Is it reality? Hell yes, cold and hard as it comes.
Time or not..that’s his act.
It’s taken him this far.
Watch.
Will it be successful?
I don’t know.
But he’s not going to turn into a bomb-throwing revolutionary overnight. His whole life has taught him otherwise, as has his DNA. He is much more Ulysses than he is Kropotkin.
Bet on it.
Watch.
AG
Zandar, AG – throw out all those theories whether or not Obama is a gradualist (moves in incremental steps) whether or not he has only 18 months or 20 months.
Obama will keep reminding that we’ve been had — this mess he inherited was built over 10 years (1997 when JPMorgan invented CDS, CDO derivatives that have now exploded). It’ll take more than 4 years to repair the damage. To get ourselves out of this hole – turn on the presses. Our creditors are shunning us.
America is no longer in the driver seat and may default.
China has told us to shove it.
We’re in a mini depression. Jobless claims at 516,000 plus, a 25 year high. Summer 2009 will be brutal.
Oil is already telling us so, February oil futures sold today at $30 per barrel.
Yesterday, Paulson’s shift on the bait and switch bailout was a cute way of announcing that Bernanke was now taking over —
Quantitative Easing is in – open for business.
And Titans of business, Economists of all hues have told President-elect Obama he has no choice but to print and spend. Consumers, businesses and financial sectors are stone broke. The only one left standing is the federal government. So hit the ground running spend as fast as it can be printed on infrastructure, healthcare, new energy industries to keep the lights on and the economy on life support.
Nice links.
But, and this is key, Obama will not be able to act ahead of the public perception of events. The things that we are hoping for are just not on the agenda of his corporate sponsors, and he will never cross them, nor can he gainsay them until waving pitchforks persuade THEM that they have no choice.
But those pitchforks, if they come at all, come way way behind events. To mitigate the trouble we are seeing right now action should have occured two years ago. Where were the pitchforks then? Lying unused: The public still thought everything was fine.
This crisis will remain years ahead of public perception indefinitely. Right now the trouble that will hit in 2009 and 2010 is brewing, but nothing is being done. It will be–again–a fait accompli. This pattern will persist through what can only be a decades-long–note the plural–period of hard times.
There are some small things he might be able to do. He might, for example, find a way to keep people in their homes rather than letting them be thrown on the street–and persuade the bankers to allow this. This would count for much. But, people will still be penniless. Right now I am wondering how people will get fed: Not only will they be broke, but next year food is likely to be short even in the US. (And the years after will be worse.)
Normalcy will not return. That is beyond anyone, Obama included. We are not going to “recover.”
Bosnia? I’m actually proud of our intervention in Bosnia also Kosovo. I think we stopped a lot of suffering in the Balkans.
and you will find that we definitely caused more harm than we prevented. It didn’t have to be that way, except, yes, the US had another agenda, in which the well-being of the people living in the region had small weight.
That is of course, discounting our use of depleted-uranium munitions. Throw that in, and the fact is we committed a crime beyond history–topping anything we or anyone had done prior to that date.
Since topped by still greater crimes, but I digress.
We did not use depleted uranium in Bosnia. That is used as anti-tank weapons. There is no oil in Bosnia or Kosovo. Operation “Just Cause” was an air campaign that drove Milosevic’s war criminals and ethnic cleansers from the province. Ever hear of Srebrenica? We stopped a genocide. Kosovo the same thing diffrent day Milosevic’s murderers were raping and killing. They were forcing people from their own land loading them into train boxcars and shipping the living to the border.
These are two intervenions that were actually justified. Unlike Iraq which is unjustified and caused far, far more suffering then relief.
why is he making scary sounds about Iran now? Out of habit? Because it’s a grand tradition for America’s politicians to pander to its warmongers?
I’m about fed up with that kind of bull plop. I voted for change, didn’t you?
I’m also fed up with Obama continuing to talk about the “war on terror”. I understand that he didn’t want to get into a debate on the validity of that notion during the election, but now that the election is over, he should stop using this term, the way Gordon Brown has.
Doing so would be a small but significant gesture indicating that Obama wants to scale America’s imperial ambitions somewhat relative to the neocons.
Yeah, I’m out of love with “GWOT” too. I remember when YMB wouldn’t change it to struggle against extremism because he didn’t want to be a struggle-time president.
J
Of course! And, also, why in the world would Iran want to nuke Poland, as Bush insists? Upset about bad pierogi?
North Korea worries me because their loony tune leadership might have a taste for gotterdamerung. Maybe the neocons SHOULD have talked to them… about starting the End days. But, I guess Korea is not mentioned in the Bible.
But, you can’t explain geopolitics to an electorate of which 50% can’t find North America on a globe.
No, Iran has no reason to nuke Poland, even if it had nukes, which it doesn’t.
Iran is well past its peak oil. If the west (US) is so terrified of them having nuclear power then we should offer some assistance to develop solar or wind. Obama does have an opportunity to give us real change. He may be on a slippery slope in trying to look middle of the road aka the right wing of old. The time is soon here to man up. January is just around the corner.
Iran has said all along that their ONLY interest in nuclear power at all was for… domestic electric power production. They see their oil reserves as a national resource for export. (and I’m not certain they have the refining capacity to do much more with it than that).
But they’re probably good candidates for solar and/or wind power.
I think we can get a lot further with Iran by talking trade than with threats of trade sanctions.
People need to remember that Ahmedinajad got elected because he talked tough against Bush — and he is not the real power in Iran anyway, the theocracy is. And THEY issued a fatwah against developing or having nuclear weapons….
I’m taking time out from ET and having a browse here on Booman.
That has to be one of the most concise, intelligent and level-headed posts I’ve seen on the US side of the Pond re Iran for a while.
I had ten days in Iran recently when after
this presentation
at an Oil Refining conference I got to see a couple of ministers, the Chairman of the Majlis Energy Commission; a couple of heads of State owned corporations; press conference; yada yada.
They were interested among other things in my proposals for alternative financing of refineries etc You are quite right – they sell gasoline for 40 cents a gallon and demand is so high they have to import the stuff – and the Tehran traffic and pollution has to be seen and breathed to be believed….
I was interested to see that they recently opened a new wind farm – 43 relatively small German turbines. I met their National Grid people to talk to them about how they could finance more.
US policy has been totally counter-productive. In fact the effect of financial sanctions has been to protect Iran from the global Credit Crunch. It also puts the “reformist” faction – loosely led by former president Khatami – in something of a quandary: now that the Western system is fucked, what do they want to reform to….they have no Plan B….
In the four years since I have been going there the country has been opening up – thanks to large infusions of oil money – at a rate of knots.
It reminds me of Russia before the fall of Communism; big pictures of Khomeini and Khameini and Iran/Iraq war martyrs everywhere – pretty much ignored; prayer rooms almost totally unused; the Revolutionary Guard so much demonised in the MSM are the ones who import the booze from Turkey; 8% strength Tuborg….serious stuff, but the wine was crap; 70% of the population under 30 and most of them with illegal satellite dishes. And so on.
You get the picture, I hope. The US should – as you say – open up the floodgates and get trading – you’d achieve your objectives within five years and make a fortune doing it. Detroit might even sell ’em their old production lines – that’s what the Brits and then the French did….
This
A New Dawn for Iran
article was written for Iranian publication in Farsi, but Asia Times liked it.
I’m back there for another conference in a couple of weeks. The main focus of attention is the gas market and the “Gas OPEC” initiative, where they are interetsed in the partnership approach to global markets I advocate.