Introduction to the translated version of the Speigel report.
“Spiegel database” of West Bank settlements and outposts
Developed by the Israeli Ministry of DefenseEnclosed are translations of excerpts from a classified Israeli government database never before released to the public. This database has been in assembly since 2004, when then-Minister of Defense Shaul Mofaz tasked Brigadier General (Res.) Baruch Spiegel with building a database to include up-to-date reference for all statutory aspects of settlements and outposts in the West Bank.
The report data demonstrates:
Over 30 settlements – including longstanding settlements such as Ariel, Kochav Yaakov, Beit El, Elon Moreh and Ofrah – that were to some extent built on private Palestinian land.
Construction activity within settlements being conducted without necessary building permits or in direct violation of the building plans.
The extent and locations of unauthorized building in outposts across the West Bank.
January 30, 2009
Secret database shows Israeli government to be active partner in settlement land grab is Philip Weiss’ title to this story printed in the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz (from Mondoweiss). Weiss describes the story as “huge”: Secret Israeli database reveals full extent of illegal settlement The story outlines a database created by the Israeli defense establishment to gather:
credible and accessible information at the ready to contend with legal actions brought by Palestinian residents, human rights organizations and leftist movements challenging the legality of construction in the settlements and the use of private lands to establish or expand them.
Perhaps what is left out of the story is the extent to which Israeli occupation forces over the years collaborated with settler teams to wrest Palestinian land from its owners, using harassment, violence, house demolitions, and destruction of farmlands and orchards (see Israel’s land grab caper: how it works, Daily Kos).
Now we have admission on the part of the military of this collaboration in building the settlements, all of which are illegal according to international law.
.
Weiss says,
The (Haartez) article adds, “the painstakingly amassed data was labeled political dynamite.”
Well the dynamite has exploded.
There is much that can, and will, be said about this report. The initial take home message is that whenever you read or see a story where the Israeli government is presented as a counter balance to the “radical settler movement” you now know this is false. The Israeli government has been supporting and expanding the settlement project in the occupied territories all along, and it is now documented. The settlements have long been viewed as an exception, out of the government’s control, an issue that will be dealt with later. They should now be viewed as the rule. This point is made clear by a settler leader himself:
“Nothing was done in hiding,” says Pinchas Wallerstein, director-general of the Yesha Council of settlements and a leading figure in the settlement project. “I’m not familiar with any [building] plans that were not the initiative of the Israeli government.”
Dror Etkes, an anti-settlement activist with the Israeli NGO Yesh Din has now published an analysis of the database today, along with an English translation of excerpts (the Ha’aretz article contains the database in Hebrew). Etkes says:
There is no doubt that this is the most important database that has ever been exposed on this issue, covering the activities of the State of Israel in the context of the settlement enterprise. It includes reference to additional statutory issues that until now have never been dealt with in public, and in fact proves a colossal violation of the law in nearly every aspect, applicable to most of the settlements – building without permit, land-theft, etc. This proves again that the State and the settlers have an unwritten agreement that divides the work between them: While settlers, through public bodies which they control, actually perform most of the illegal construction and trespassing, the State finances and provides sweeping and ongoing immunity to these criminal activities.
The Etkes analysis and the English translation of parts of the database can be downloaded from Mondoweiss.
During the Clinton administration, the rate and number of settlers moving into the Palestinian territories doubled. But during that period as well, Ariel Sharon was Minister of Agriculture. Using this position, he instituted the ‘dunam by dunam’ policy (a dunam is about a quarter of an acre), which was intended to encourage IDF-settler teams to procure Palestinian land a bit at a time. The result was new “illegal” settlements, usually on hilltops, but also the expansion of existing settlements. The result: 290,000 Israeli settlers controlling, with the help of the IDF, 42% of the Palestinian territories (not including the Gaza settlements, which were given up).
During the Bush administration, although the Road Map (based on George Mitchell’s 2001 report, which again proposed the two states solution) called for Israel to stop settlement building, it never complied and the Bush administration never complained. Cement continued to pour throughout the eight years of Bush.
No doubt that today, settlements is largest impediment to peace in the Middle East.
IHT
Israel will likely ignore any dictates of the court. But the ground has shifted world wide…and after 60 minutes’ Bob Simon report and the furious public letter denouncing US-Israeli conduct from Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia’s Ambassador to the US… one can hope that US support has reached its limits. Following the al-Faisal letter Obama’s first call to a foreign leader was to Abbas.
Yes, the financial meltdown is a critical hammer in the new era. US needs Saudis to buy trillions of bonds to fund the bailouts.
Obama already asked that Israel open the gates and permit humanitarian aid to get into Gaza. Israel is not responding. Only about 15% of the needed supplies are being allowed in.
Is this a moment of truth or change in US policy toward Israel?
Neither. It is more of the same.
I too believe that George Mitchell will fail. Obama will not use the pen to force Israel to the peace table.
But Mitchell was there on day one so to speak, and that is a stark difference from Clinton and Bush.
George Mitchell will fail because the will does not exist at any level of the Obama administration to take the necessary steps with Israel. The Palestinians have been ready for decades. The Arabs have been ready for at least the last seven years. The Israelis will never be ready until they stop profiting from the occupation, colonization, and exploitation of Palestinian, Syrian, and Lebanese lands, and the use of their military for criminal purposes.
The Obama administration will never do what it takes to take that profit away from them.
Perhaps one clue is Israel’s ignorance of Obama’s request to open up the borders of Gaza to permit sufficient humanitarian aid to get in. It is still a trickle of what is needed, says the UN.
Perhaps one clue is Israel’s ignorance of Obama’s request to open up the borders of Gaza to permit sufficient humanitarian aid to get in. It is still a trickle of what is needed, says the UN.
By ignorance I assume you you do not mean that they do not know about it, but that they are ignoring it?
Yes that is what I mean. Doesn’t auger well for the future. Obama will not use the pen to bring Israel’s colonialism to its knees.
Frankly, at this point, I don’t think the Israelis know what they are doing, beyond what Jeff Halper suggested a few years ago: “managed conflict,” keeping the conflict going so as not to have to seriously negotiate with the Palestinians.
Today the Los Angeles Times reported that Obama intends to keep and possibly expand the program of extraordinary rendition. This is the program in which Maher Arar, an innocent Canadian citizen was kidnapped at the New York airport by the U.S. government, and sent to Syria to be kept in a grave-like cell and tortured regularly for one year. And Obama wants to continue this kind of criminal activity, and possibly expand it. If he will do this, what hope is there that he will do the right thing for Palestine?
My expectations for Obama were so low that I did not think he could disappoint me, but I was wrong.
That’s totally wrong – the LAT article is debunked, they overlooked the actual order
Hilzoy oberves:
I am relieved to hear it. It is bad enough that one of Obama’s first acts in office was to bomb Pakistan, killing mostly civilians, including three children. If he decided to continue with extraordinary rendition (something Bill Clinton used quite a bit, by the way), that would simply be too much.
.
After Netanyahu and senior Likud officials blasted Olmert and Livni’s “promises” and accused Livni of agreeing to divide Jerusalem, she was forced to disassociate herself from the understandings. Livni said:
“I will advance only an agreement that represents our interests. Maintaining maximum settlers and places that we hold dear such as Jerusalem — not a single refugee will enter.”
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Sad how the polls still favoring Netanyahu-Likud, after the Gaza massacres, is causing a reversal of agendas within the Labor-Kadima coalition.
Strangely, Bill Clinton comes to mind after reading this post: win by stealing the opposition’s positions. And the cement keeps pouring.
Sad how the polls still favoring Netanyahu-Likud, after the Gaza massacres, is causing a reversal of agendas within the Labor-Kadima coalition.
Strangely, Bill Clinton comes to mind after reading this post: win by stealing the opposition’s positions. And the cement keeps pouring.
Netanyahu takes it, we can stand by for war – his promised attack on Iran (fulfilling the wishes in some quarters; the thinking is we need a war to end the financial crisis..it was the war that rescued the Great Depression) So stand by, it will pale BushCheney’s Iraq legacy –
Iraq’s Shocking Human Toll: About 1 Million Killed, 4.5 Million Displaced, 1-2 Million Widows, 5 Million Orphans
Oil and war profits.
Yes, I heard her say on 60 Minutes that she would empty the settlements no matter what kind of riots it might cause, and then I heard her say what you quoted above.
These people have no shame. No shame at all.
We all did. The Israelis used to claim that Arafat said one thing to the Western press, and another to his own people, perhaps carried by the Arab press.
How can you be a politicians without dishonesty being your most salient trait?
the great agenda to divide and conquer-
Go take a read from Israeli media; Arutz Sheva – Israel National News.com quoting of all outlets World Net Daily and AP:
Israel apparently can only use one scapegoat at a time. Fatah, by contrast, is the compliant dupe and could not conceivably return to, terrorism? Is that what it is still called?
So far my research using Israeli sources indicates that it is Fatah and Islamic Jihad, not Hamas, who are firing the rockets. This is consistent with history. According to the Israeli government and a right wing Israeli “terrorism” think tank, prior to Israel breaking the 2008 cease fire on Nov 4, the very small number of rockets fired from Gaza came mainly from Fatah, with a few from Islamic Jihad. Hamas did not fire any during that period.
And Hamas’ reward for its restraint? The usual bombs, and mass punishment for the people.
go read Uri Avnery’s new article:
and so it shall be for the recent Gaza war crimes. Bet on it.
Yes, I saw this about the mass murder in the home of Salah Shehadeh. Good news indeed. It’s a start, finally.
Now let’s see if it ever comes to anything.