Fresh Conservative, where neo-nazis are left-wing. It’s hard to be unintentionally funny when you’re discussing murder and Nazis, but Brett Tatman pulled it off. Mel Brooks would be proud. Or not. I can’t tell anymore.
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
18 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
psyco is infact true! Did you happen to read the list of ppl on their list of references to the right to that page? WOW!!! and this is a place libs would want to come to and vent@!!#@$^& These ppl are just plain bat-feces crazy no wonder they do/say the things they say and do……
BTW, where do you find these web pages?
that one I found when someone tweeted about it.
someday, you will have to explain to me how to tweet….;o)
what is your Twitter addy?
booman23
I didn’t know you were on Twitter or else I would have followed you.
I just joined a couple of days ago.
I haven’t even learned to iFace yet.
Liberals question 9/11 (possible Bush involvement). Von Brunn questioned 9/11, therefore von Brunn was a liberal.
I could debunk this syllogism with a simple Venn diagram, but I can’t draw here, so I’ll argue by analogy:
Hitler liked Alsatian dogs. I like Alsatian dogs, therefore I am a Nazi.
therefore you are Hitler (using their “logic”). does Godwin have something to say about this?
.
was used as reference and explains it all –
Holocaust Museum shooter von Brunn a 9/11 ‘truther’ who hated ‘neo-cons’, Bush, McCain
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
But did he like Alsatian dogs?
Somebody you don’t want in your club.
link
Jeff Merkley rocks.
Oh my.
Here (via Sparklepony) some genius explains how the gunman at the Holocaust Museum is really a left-wing liberal whack-job, as described in Jonah Goldberg’s authoritative book “Liberal Fascists.”
Really.
We laugh, but I’ve got a relative whose world view is flipped upside by this weird world view. She wrote with a straight face that Father Coughlin was a progressive and a socialist and only stopped supporting FDR because the President didn’t go “far enough.”
I want to continue to remind people that both of Jonah Goldberg’s parents worked for the North American Newspaper Association (or Alliance). NANA was a CIA cover in the sixties and seventies. Another NANA “reporter,” Priscilla MacMillan, who just happened to be in the embassy in Moscow when Oswald “defected,” got to interview him there and record his “Marxist beliefs.” After the assassination she took Marina under her wing, and then later took Svetlana Stalin under her wing when she defected from the Soviet Union.
People know Lucianne Goldberg, Jonah’s mother, from her friendship with Linda Tripp (who worked with DOD’s top secret Delta Force before she was reassigned to the White House) and her back-the-scenes work against Bill Clinton, including the whole Lewinsky thing. But back in 1973, using the cover of the Women’s News Service, an affiliate of NANA, she spied on the McGovern campaign for Nixon. Back in the early sixties she was a consultant for JFK’s White House staff.
So if Jonah worries about fascism, he doesn’t seem to worry about the intelligence service aspect of fascism.
The page is gone this morning. They say
Drat. It must have been particularly loony.