You’ve probably never heard of Anne Finger. She is a writer for the Progressive Media Project affiliated with The Progressive magazine, and she attended the funeral of Dr. George Tiller. As the former abortion counselor, and a woman who had an abortion, one would assume she knew what Dr. Tiller’s practice entailed. One would assume that she would understand people don’t go to get late term abortions for fun, on a whim. One would assume that she knows that women faced with these horrific situations in which their life is in serious danger from the pregnancy, or the certainty that their child, if it survived birth, would be born to a brief, unhappy and pain filled life due to a genetic anomaly or other disorder such as Anencephaly, Patau syndrome, Lethal Dwarfism, etc. are faced with making a heartbreaking and grief stricken decision.
Well, be careful what you assume. Just because someone writes for an organization with the word “Progressive” in its title doesn’t mean they are necessarily “progressive” if you know what I mean. Indeed, some of them can be downright mendacious. Here’s what Anne Finger wrote “disturbed” her regarding a vigil held for Dr. Tiller:
At the vigil, mostly I heard about the “tragedy” of “fetal defects.” The unstated assumption was that disabilities are bad, and of course we should want to get rid of them. If that’s not possible, we should prevent the birth of someone with a disability.
These unstated assumptions concern me. We need to be wary of the dangers of talking about choice in a vacuum, of not acknowledging the social and economic forces that shape our individual “choices,” and the impact that those cumulative individual choices can, in turn, have.
The strongest support for abortion comes in cases of “fetal defect,” but I think that tells us less about support for abortion and more about society’s fear of disability. […]
You could become disabled while you are in a car, backpacking, diving into a swimming pool or, as happened to a friend of mine, sledding down a hill on a school cafeteria tray.
You could get an infection or develop an autoimmune disease.
In fact, disability probably will happen to you or a family member; it will almost certainly be a part of your life.
I urge my fellow supporters of abortion rights not to reinforce prejudices about disability. We cannot allow ourselves to become a force for oppression of one group in the name of liberating another.
One wonders how Ms. Finger was able to read the minds of the speakers, and know that in their hearts they meant “disability” when they said “fetal defect?” What inner knowledge allows her to metaphorically point her damning finger at them for “fostering prejudice” against people with “disabilities” in order to advance an abortion rights agenda? I know I wouldn’t have assumed that the mere use of the term “fetal defects” (like Anencephaly, or Trisomy 18) equated to an unspoken desire to eliminate people with disabilities.
For example, here’s what the Wikipedia entry on Anencephaly says regarding the life expectancy of infants born with this “fetal defect”:
A baby born with anencephaly is usually blind, deaf, unconscious, and unable to feel pain. Although some individuals with anencephaly may be born with a main brain stem, the lack of a functioning cerebrum permanently rules out the possibility of ever gaining consciousness. Reflex actions such as breathing and responses to sound or touch may occur. […]
Most anencephalic babies do not survive birth, accounting for 55% of non-aborted cases. If the infant is not stillborn, then he or she will usually die within a few hours or days after birth from cardiorespiratory arrest.
And here’s what the Wikipedia entry on Trisomy 18 says regarding the complications an infant born with this fetal defect (also known as Edwards Syndrome):
The survival rate of Edwards Syndrome is very low. About 95% die in utero. Of liveborn infants, only 50% live to 2 months, and only 5–10% will survive their first year of life. […]
Infants born with Edwards syndrome may have some or all of the following characteristics: kidney malformations, structural heart defects at birth (i.e., ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus), intestines protruding outside the body (omphalocele), esophageal atresia, mental retardation, developmental delays, growth deficiency, feeding difficulties, breathing difficulties, and arthrogryposis (a muscle disorder that causes multiple joint contractures at birth).
Now I have a disability caused by my malfunctioning autoimmune system. My wife has a disability as a result of her chemotherapy treatment for pancreatic cancer and severe Type 1 diabetes. My nephew who suffers from seizures and displays autistic like behaviors, has a disability. So I think I have some idea of what people with disabilities face.
A child with Anencephaly is essentially brain dead and not likely to survive long outside the womb, if it is not stillborn. A child with Trisomy 18 or Edwards Syndrome has a 1% chance of survival until age ten, and then only if he or she has the “less severe mosaic Edwards syndrome.” These go far beyond what we typically think of as “disabilities.” How Ms. Finger determined that the “unstated assumption” of the speakers at the San Francisco vigil for Dr. Tiller was that “disabilities are bad” and that these Pro-Choice speakers supported the idea that any child with a potential disability “should be aborted” is also beyond me.
Certainly no one who attended and wrote about Dr. Tiller’s funeral service had anything to say about these “unstated assumptions” which Ms. Finger somehow was able to sniff out at the vigil she attended. If anything, like fellow abortion provider Dr. William F. Harrison what they remembered about the funeral service had nothing whatsoever to do with prejudice against people with disabilities, and focused instead on the incredible kindness and generosity shown throughout the life of George Tiller, by all accounts a compassionate human being who was murdered by a fanatical right wing terrorist. And, of course, they mourned his loss.
George took them when they were not able to pay for his services. He accepted patients for whom we sometimes had to give money to even make the trip. George’s colleagues who knew of his deep religious faith, generosity, kindness and love called him St. George when we spoke among ourselves, though we knew it embarrassed him to hear himself addressed this way. […]
On the first Saturday in June, Dr. George Tiller’s funeral was held in the College Hill Methodist Church in Wichita. The Lutheran church where he was killed was much too small to contain the people from all over this country, Canada and South and Central America who showed up to honor this remarkable man and hear his friend and children eulogize him. His wife, Jeanne, a member of the choir at their church, sang a beautiful “Lord’s Prayer” for her husband, who she called “my best buddy and the love of my life.”
I find it extremely uncomfortable to cry. But I totally lost my composure at the oldest daughter’s eulogy to her father and during Jeanne’s beautiful song.
So, Anne Finger, as one person with a disability to another, please stop using your fertile imagination to conjure up the canard that the “unstated assumption” of those who support abortion, and particularly supporters of the late term abortion services provided to women in extremis by doctors like George Tiller, is the result of prejudice against people with disabilities. If I may be blunt, it’s highly dishonest of you to make that leap based on the use of the word “fetal defect.” It’s the sort low, deceitful statement I would expect from right wing hatemongers like Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly or Rush Limbaugh. To paraphrase your own commentary, I think it says more about your own prejudices than about the men and women who support a woman’s right to choose.
self-righteousness is an equal opportunity persuasion…on the left as well as the right, steven.
like you, l also have family members who are disabled, and to have some pompous ass, from either side of the political spectrum, use that as platform for prejudicial drivel such as this is not only demeaning, but highly offensive.
l’ve a couple fingers for ms. finger….she may consider them an appropriate salute.
If you are carrying a fetus with Down’s, abortion is a very good idea. Yes, these CHILDREN are loving and very affectionate. That’s the first 18 years. What about years 19-50 (often the lifespan is shortened)? Are they cute at 25? 35? Who takes care of them when the parents die?
I have a son of 19. This kid is a handfull. He is probably borderline something. No social skills, bad attitude, grumpy all the time. And his intelligence is unimpaired. He is bigger than me, at 6’3″. He is probably stronger, although I am more ruthless and have greater cunning (“age and treachery beats youth and strength”). If he had Down’s and was greatly impaired, would his sex drive be impaired? NOPE. His self-control certainly would be, however.
There is a young man at church who comes occasionally. He is about 35. He has Down’s. He lives with his parents, who are 70ish. He will never leave. He will also never talk, and shows no ability to function independently. He is high-functioning, in that he can feed himself. Is that what you, the parent wants? Not me.
So, this idea that “life is its own reward” or similar total crap leaves me totally crazy. IT’s JUST CRAZY.
And don’t even ask about the brothers and sisters. A child with disabilities totally takes over the household, and everything is distorted.
If the fetus has a disability, you should abort.
My parents watched my older brother die from his spina bifida condition. This was back in the late forties. No abortions, no foreknowledge and nothing could be done unless you had lots of money, and then very little. It took a year from the time he came home from the hospital until he died. My mother, who’s now over eighty, only recently talked with me about it, watching her son slowly die. I can’t think of anything more painful than watching a child die. Of course, medicine is more advanced, and if there is such a major defect and it can’t be corrected in utero then there is the option of abortion.
Somehow I don’t think that Anne Finger seems to get that, at least from what she wrote. Dr. Tiller wasn’t aborting fetuses for parents who were going for designer babies.
All I have to say is God bless each of you here…Steven you and your family are always in my heart and mind and prayers. I have never told any of you here that my oldest, my sweet daughter, had a trisomy 18 baby. she had a section to bring it into this world, Baby was stillborn, of course. My daughter and her husband would never consider an abortion. This was their decision and only theirs. I do not know just what I would have done, if it had been me in their shoes. When little Lilly came back in her mothers arms, with her father walking beside the gurney that carries her and her mother, we all knew what the situation was. We all could now take her blanket off of her for the for her skin would tear off of her, due to the fact she had been dead inside of her mom for about a week. My daughter that morning she went to the hospital told me that she could feel movement. Obviously that was not so, but she still had hope….she knew the truth of what Lilly would have if she were born alive and probably not live beyond 36 to 48 hours…It took this to let my daughter and her husband grieve and let go the only why they knew how.
I tell you all this, so you can see the other side of the yardstick. I knew the hazards and I told my family what they were. It still did not matter. We all got to hold little Lilly and know within our own hearts that she was a gift from God and to let go. Let go in only the way we could. It really made the difference for us..However, I do not hate or feel bad towards someone who got the abortion for this reason. We all have to do what we have to do.
we have that memory…that is worth more than any money could be mentioned. Thank you all for your heartfelt thoughts and knowledge. It makes a difference to know when to play your cards and when to fold, I suppose.
I feel very very sorry for Dr Tiller, his family and friends and peers. I know there has to be someone to do the job he had to do. There is a time for this to happen for someone and I pray that someone will be around to help out those that need ppl like him.
I only hope that you all understand what I am trying to convey here….
There are so many true progressive journalists who would love a gig with a progressive publication, it infuriates me when they instead hire non-progressive, usually biased and stupid, people instead.
Finger is not alone. There is a strong strain of this sort of self-absorbed, paranoid thinking among some in the disability rights community. Here in Washington state, we had a right-to-die ballot initiative last year that legalized assisted suicide for the terminally ill. The protections, based on a similar law that’s worked well in Oregon for ten years, were pretty strong: the patient had to be certified by two separate doctors as having less than six months to live, there had to be counseling and multiple witnessed declarations involved, the prescription drug used had to be self-administered, and so on.
This didn’t stop some “disability rights” folks from screaming variations on the theme that this was all an evil plot by society and/or insurance companies to euthanize them. (It passed easily anyway.) Finger’s wanking reminds me a lot of this.
BTW, I’m also disabled – I’ve survived an experimental double-organ transplant, a stroke, three types of cancer, and 15 years of immunosuppression. (And yes, my insurance company when I was at my sickest tried very hard to kill me. It’s not like I trust the species.) Most of the seriously chronically ill folks I know supported the initiative. A lot of the disability/euthanasia noise seemed to come from folks whose disabilities are unfortunate, of course, but never seriously life and death. Surviving such experiences tend to change one’s outlook on mortality-related issues. Just my own observations.
A long time ago, I used to know Anne Finger personally. That’s all I want to say on that matter.
Some time after I last saw her, in the Eighties, she published a book about her childbearing experience as a disabled woman. Now it’s been more than 20 years, but from what I remember reading, Finger distrusted doctors to the point where she gave herself to the care of a midwife, even though she was having problems during the pregnancy, problems that in the hands of a medical professional (that she could trust) she could have avoided. Now I am not an expert on these things, but what dismayed me was the impression that she allowed it to happen so that the child would be just as disabled as she is. It’s never left me, and if I am wrong, then I am wrong. But my mouth forgot to close for what felt like several minutes in my horror reading what occurred.
I don’t blame you, Stevie D, if you’re ticked off at her for this latest. Believe me, some people have been there already.