What I find interesting about this Max Boot column in Commentary is not that he is gleeful that Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has been declared the winner of the election. Nor am I interested that he thinks it makes it more likely that Obama will give Netanyahu permission to launch air strikes against Iran. What interests me is that Boot shows no concern for the people of Iran who went and voted and saw their vote discarded. The people who are being beaten like dogs tonight by Ansar-e Hezbollah’s thugs at Iran’s universities and on Iran’s city streets. The people who are tweeting to the world about their desire for regime change. All over the world, tomorrow, people will be wearing green in solidarity with these democrats who want to throw off the oppression of their theocratic regime. In twenty cities, all over Iran, they will take to streets in a few hours to demand their rights and to scream ‘death to dictators.’ They will probably be beaten, arrested, perhaps even killed. They began with a simple desire to see their votes counted accurately. Now they want true freedom.
But Max Boot doesn’t care about them. He blithely assumes that Ahmadinejad will succeed in his coup d’etat, and he’s damn happy about it because he thinks it will give Israel the right to bomb these democrats.
Imagine if Max Boot had decided it was a bad thing for Poland to earn their freedom from Soviet domination because it would make it harder to sustain our immense defense budgets. That’s the kind of cynical callousness Mr. Boot is displaying this evening when he says this:
Even the Obama administration will be hard put to enter into serious negotiations with Ahmadinejad, especially when his scant credibility has been undermined by these utterly fraudulent elections and the resulting street protests.
That doesn’t mean that Obama won’t try–but he will have a lot less patience with Ahmadinejad than he would have had with Mousavi. And that in turn means there is a greater probability that eventually Obama may do something serious to stop the Iranian nuclear program–whether by embargoing Iranian refined-petroleum imports or by tacitly giving the go-ahead to Israel to attack its nuclear installations.
So in an odd sort of way a win for Ahmadinejad is also a win for those of us who are seriously alarmed about Iranian capabilities and intentions. With crazy Mahmoud in office–and his patron, Ayatollah Khameini, looming in the background–it will be harder for Iranian apologists to deny the reality of this terrorist regime.
In a few hours, when hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Iranians take to the streets to fight for democracy and liberal reforms and better relations with the West, Max Boot will be cheering on the Ayatollah’s thugs who will greet them with truncheons and bullets and prison and torture.
That’s who Max Boot is. That is what Commentary has become.
These are the craziest, most immoral bastards on the face of the earth.
To talk blithely about bombing (hoping even) Iran like it is some empty real estate, without millions of residents.
They really don’t think brown people have any value.
nalbar
It’s not just brown people. Given the woeful lack of supplies given to our own troops in Iraq, I think it’s pretty clear that they view anyone outside their class and ideological block as dispensable.
The difference between the Straussian fascists of the neocon movement and garden-variety neo-Nazis like James von Brunn is mostly a matter of better diction and more expensive wardrobes.
People who attempt to exalt themselves above their fellow men invariably achieve the opposite: they become beasts.
I found this post by Sullivan, http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/sos-from-tehran.html, very disturbing.
Obviously, we can’t do anything to help those students.
If Obama is serious about finding a diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear technology aspirations he will be, in effect, recognizing Ahmadinejad’s government as legitimate.
I wonder if those students and the reform movement will view this as a further betrayal building on resentments going back to the 53′ coup.
You know how despised Ahmadinejad is when they are chanting “death to the dictator.” I think I heard him referred to as a Zionist sympathizer in one of the youtube videos. Not that he is but that’s apparently among the worst of insults one can be called.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/06/sos-from-tehran.html
Comma ruined that link.
http://docudharma.com/diary/14228/progressive-assholes
Booman,
Why are you so sure the election was stolen? It may be that poorer Iranians from outside Tehran…which is the vast majority…appreciate AN’s progressive reforms such as healthcare delivered to the poor, low interest home loans for low income people, access to higher education. Also the fact that in a country where the government is known for corruption, he still lives humbly. Prior presidents have managed to enrich themselves while in office.
As for his alleged mishandling of the economy, you may have noticed that there has been a global economic crisis. Not just one in Iran. Also, the U.N. as well as the U.S. have imposed sanctions with the stated purpose of hurting Iran’s economy. So maybe the voters aren’t putting all the blame on him.
Also, its a funny way to fix an election; First have a loud campaign where the opposition can state its case fully. Have multiple televised debates where other candidates attack the incumbent vigorously. Then steal the election? Typically, they silence a popular opposition before the election even happens.
I’m not Iranian and I don’t have any special insight as to what is happening. Only that the story line presented to us by the MSM does not make sense.
I think the naked salivating over the prospect of Israel bombing (nuking?) Iran remains the most part of this brutish diatribe. Of course it’s all of a piece: the real humans who reside in Iran and the Middle East and the world are no more than collateral damage in the New Crusades to make the world more profitable for the merchants of death and oil. But he is right: the election and its aftermath are a boon to his side.
Years ago I used to read Commentary for its thoughtful views. Even though I disagreed with its conclusions more often than not, it was a valuable sounding board. It’s truly sad to see what it’s become.