Gadfly is Marty Aussenberg, a columnist for the weekly Memphis Flyer. He was an SEC enforcement official back in the day when its reputation was still intact.
Have you heard? Al and Tipper Gore are separating, after 40 years of marital bliss. Judging from all the hubub in the media over this story, you’d think the earth had somehow deviated from its orbit. How could two people who were married to each other for so long possibly call it quits? What does this say about the institution of marriage, and will the earth ever return to its position vis a vis the sun? I have my own theory about this parting of the ways, and it’s based, in part, on a sad episode in the Gores’ history. And while part of it, I admit, is tongue in cheek (albeit plausible) speculation, the fact is, for the Gores, just as for so many others, the past can be prologue.
Continued below:
I, for one, was totally unsurprised by the announcement of the Gores’ separation. The only thing that did surprise me is that it took as long as it did, because I suspect this was brewing for some time–25 years, to be exact. I trace the etiology of this earth-shattering breakup to the events surrounding Tipper (that name, alone, should be grounds for divorce), and her self-appointed crusade on behalf of America’s children, and their need to be protected from audio recordings of a sexual or violent nature. No, I’m not talking about censorship as it was practiced by such arbiters of taste as my own adopted home town’s notorious Lloyd Binford . I’m talking about the organization formed by Mrs. Gore in 1985, with the support of several other senators’ wives (including Strom Thurmond’s), known as the Parents’ Music Resource Center (“PMRC”).
The objective of the PMRC was to (and I’m cutting to the chase here) censor the content of the lyrics on music recordings. Oh sure, they called it record “labeling,” but everyone recognized it for what it was. As a result of Mrs. Gore, and her cohorts’, efforts, a hearing was held before a Senate committee in which witnesses, including “Tipper”(I don’t know why this tune pops into my head every time I hear or see that name) appeared before the members of that committee to testify about the evils of unregulated music lyrics, in an effort to get the government to support, ultimately, censoring those lyrics.
The hearing is noteworthy for, among other reasons, the appearances of Frank Zappa and Dee Snider (not to mention John Denver), noted musicians of their time, who eloquently opposed the efforts of Mrs. Gore and her taste police. And, guess which senator just happened to be on the committee that held that hearing? If you guessed Al Gore, shame on you for your cynicism, but congratulations for your perspicacity. That’s right, “Tipper” got her husband to convene a hearing on her pet project, who then participated actively in that hearing, including by asking the witnesses (not the least of whom was his own wife) questions about the PMRC’s campaign. It’s bad enough this paragon of Democratic principles could even entertain the prospect of censorship, of any kind, but it’s even worse that he didn’t recognize how utterly inappropriate it was to entertain those prospects in his official capacity, in a public forum where his wife was advocating them.
That always struck a discordant note for me, since all of the ethical standards I’m aware of require someone with a personal relationship to the parties (or witnesses) in a proceeding to disqualify (or recuse) themselves from that proceeding. But I guess that standard was unknown to then-Senator Gore (even though it was highlighted for him by Zappa in his testimony), or didn’t matter to him in the ethics-free zone known as the U.S. Senate, since he jumped right into the agenda of his wife’s proposed version of Hollywood’s notorious Hays Code with both feet. I wondered, at the time, why a U.S. Senator would commit such a blatantly improper act, and then I figured out what mattered to him more than ethics. That’s right; I deduced that Senator Gore bargained away his integrity for a roll in the hay.
And, how did that happen? Well, since I’ve obtained access to a clandestinely recorded episode in the Gore’s bedroom from that time, the true story can now be told, and it goes like this: scene, Al and Tipper Gore’s bedroom, at bedtime; actors: Al and Tipper Gore. As the scene opens, the couple is in bed. Al is feeling a bit “frisky” (his term), and so rolls over towards Tipper’s side of the bed, and uses his usual signal for sex, “Tipper, let’s have sex” (Al is too square to use one of the many colloquialisms for that), to which Tipper responds (phonetically): “Wha, Ayel, honeh, ah don’t rahtly know whetha ahm exactleh in the mood foah thayat toonaht; but, yew know, thayer’s this thang ahm wantin’ youah li’l ole Senate to do, sugah pah, ayand ah thought yew maht be able to hep me with thayat bah holdin’ some o’ them li’l ole hearins y’all hayave from tahm to tahm.”
By this point, of course, Al is in a lather (Tipper’s Southern drawl always had that effect on him), and is starting to provide, shall we say, palpable evidence of another reason he’s frequently referred to as “wooden” (a big issue if his reputation is to be believed), so he says, “sure honey, whatever you want. Now, about that sex.” At this point, of course, I can’t tell you what happens because you may need to be protected from any description of sexual activities, but let’s just say both parties to this “tit for tat” (so to speak) conversation ended up being satisfied with its outcome.
Even Frank Zappa realized what the lubricant for the hearing was. He has been quoted as saying , in response to the question of how this subject merited a Senate hearing, “A couple of blow-jobs here and there and Bingo – you get a hearing.” Not to digress, but speaking of Frank and Tipper, he provided a priceless defense of his position, and indictment of hers, on CNN’s “Crossfire” , at one point telling his conservative protagonist on the show, a columnist for the Washington Times, to “kiss my ass.” Oh, Frank, how we miss you.
I lost any remnant of respect for Al Gore I may have had as a result of that incident (and it didn’t make me feel any warmer or fuzzier about Tipper either), and was one of the reasons I could never, after that, entertain the idea of voting for him for any public office (much less the presidency), and so it doesn’t pain me in the least to see this “power couple” split up.
If my scenario is right, and if it repeated itself (hey, if it worked once…), maybe he grew tired of that kind of manipulation, and decided he had reached his tipping point withTipper.
So, goodbye, Al and Tipper, and now let’s resume orbiting around the sun, shall we (even if, according to Al, we’re getting alarmingly warmer by doing so).
Oh my god, why? Is this even for real? A bedroom recording…? Surely it would have sufficed to call Tipper frigid and uptight.
As I said in the intro, this is tongue-in-cheek speculation.
Are you sure your tongue’s in your cheek?
Calling the results the “Hays Code” is a bit over the top; the current movie rating system is what replaced the Hays Code.
Someone is still smarting from a 20-year-old controversy.
If you were going to do a take-down of Al Gore, you might have focused on his defense of the First Gulf War in the Senate. He made a better case than any of Poppy Bush’s spokespeople did.
Now tell me where the “tongue-in-cheek” is in this diatribe. As humor, it fails like the Al Gore Macarena.
The “tongue-in-cheek” part was where I pretended to have a clandestine recording. I’m amazed someone actually thought that part was real.
I wasn’t trying to be funny (OK, well maybe just a bit amusing). I was just saying, there must be some explanation for Al Gore’s ethical misadventure, participating in (and perhaps arranging for) a hearing his wife wanted. Zappa understood the source of the motivation (albeit more crudely explained); I was just filling in, albeit speculatively, the details.
Defending the war wasn’t an ethical violation (at least not as I was using the term); doing his wife’s bidding, in his official capacity, and visibly so, was. Gore has the spine of an invertebrate. He proved that with the way he handled the 2000 election recount issue (much less the way he jettisoned Clinton during the campaign).
I didn’t actually think that you had a recording of Al Gore trying to persuade Tipper to have sex. Jesus.
Allow me to revise and extend: I didn’t actually think you had a Gore sex tape, but you’re quite clearly invested in your Tipper trading-on-sex theory, which is a) rank speculation b) beside the point of Al’s unethical use of his position to further a misguided crusade and c) dickish.
Apart from the story that Al was led astray because he was hard up for a good shag: well done!
As if John Danforth was not the one to set up the hearing? And Gore was the next-to-last-senior ranking member of the committee. And I can’t see a name on the committee of someone who would not have been supportive of parents protecting their children from “feelthy and violent” recordings. And Tipper Gore was very much a parent at that time, with kids most likely entering the “tweens” — that lucrative market segment for the entertainment industry.
And the culture of the time was the beginning of children’s pictures on milk cartons, the Little Rascals Daycare Center sex abuse trial in Edenton, NC, an incredible amount of parental fear. Ahhh, 1985. The zenith of the Reagan Administration.
And after all those years, you still hold a grudge against Tipper Gore for labels on recordings.
Truth be told, most likely with all the children gone and their separate interests and travel itineraries, scheduling the old romantic evenings became very complicated. It’s a hazard of folks in the public eye. And the separation isn’t final; it’s not a divorce yet. Something the gossips in the press miss.
Dollars to donuts, he jettisoned Clinton during the campaign because his campaign staff told him to. And who might they have been?
Donna Brazile, campaign manager
Thomas Devine, strategist
Carter Eskew, chief strategist
Michael Feldman, traveling chief of staff
William Galston, senior adviser
Chip Smith, chief of staff
Robert Schrum, senior adviser
Mark Penn, pollster
Recognize any of those names? Shrum was an adviser to John Kerry in 2004, added to the campaign staff during the campaign; Mark Penn was Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager in 2008.