I think Bill Scher is spot-on in everything he has to say about the Tea Party and its historic and contemporary place in American politics. But there is one very important thing that he misses. He’s completely correct in saying this:
The Tea Party is nothing new. It is merely the latest incarnation of the right-wing fringe that predictably overheats whenever a left-of-center reformer is elected to the presidency. It was the John Birch Society and the National Indignation Convention in the early 1960s, the Moral Majority and other “New Right” groups in the late 1970s, and Rush Limbaugh’s “dittoheads” and the militia movement in the 1990s.
I have said these same things many times. But the difference between now and the 1960’s or even the 1990’s is that the fringe of the right-wing has now spread to the whole carpet. Sure, only 18 percent of the electorate self-identifies as a Tea Party supporter, but that’s a huge percentage of the Republican electorate (and, yes, they are almost all Republicans). Fringe has built upon fringe.
How many Republicans have had to back down and apologize to Rush Limbaugh for contradicting or criticizing something he’s said on the air? Republican politicians are dealing with an insane base that’s been fed on paranoid hate-filled garbage from ‘entertainers’ for decades. It’s a rare Republican who’s willing to tell it like it is to these people. After Rep. Bob Inglis told South Carolina Republicans to stop listening to Glenn Beck, they gave him a meager 29% of the vote in the primary. His opponent got 71%. Here’s what Inglis says now:
Republican Rep. Bob Inglis, who last month lost a primary battle to retain his seat, is now taking aim at some members of his own party – the second ousted Republican to express frustration with the GOP in as many weeks.
In an interview with the Associated Press and confirmed to CNN by his office, Inglis targets the “death panels” phrase made famous by Sarah Palin when the former Alaska governor inaccurately claimed the Democratic-backed health care legislation would ration health care for the elderly.
“There were no death panels in the bill … and to encourage that kind of fear is just the lowest form of political leadership. It’s not leadership. It’s demagoguery,” said Inglis, who lost his primary challenge to conservative Trey Gowdy by 42 points last month and faced heavy criticism for voting in favor of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in 2009.
What’s changed is that the nutcases on the right are capable of beating a sane Republican incumbent by 42 points if they step out of line. Believe me, every member of the GOP in Congress is aware of this fact. They have to eat chicken dinners with these people and ask them for money. Arlen Specter knew his goose was cooked as soon as he saw the reaction to Sarah Palin. In fact, it was the selection of Sarah Palin to be a vice-presidential candidate that put this Tea Party movement into overdrive. Up to that point all their energy was being put into Ron Paul’s delegate-deprived run for the presidency. McCain made the single most irresponsible political decision since a lame-duck James Buchanan sat silently while half the country seceded from the Union.
But I’m getting off my point. My point is that, while Scher is correct to point out the Tea Party is merely the latest incarnation of the right’s rage at being governed by a Democratic President, and to point out their overall numbers are small, he’s wrong to give the impression that we’re not dealing with something extremely dangerous. Because, if you haven’t noticed, the Republicans are voting in absolute lockstep, and they’re dancing to the Tea Partiers tune. They are terrified of opposing them. And even when they do oppose them we see outcomes like Rand Paul crushing the establishment candidate in a socially conservative (i.e., not a libertarian) state.
I’ve never seen a fringe movement take control of a party’s soul and mind like this before. I was hoping that the governance of Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, and Karl Rove was the worst the right could offer, but it’s not even close. The Republicans have been cynical so long that they’ve been taken over by the duped.
Actual Republican congresspeople (with a handful of exceptions) have no interest in the Tea Party’s priorities. Want proof? Read the Mission & Platform just passed by Maine’s GOP. It’s cuckoo land. And that might be the saving grace for this country, because the establishment GOP doesn’t intend to become the party of Rand Paul. They just want to use that energy to get back into power and take the gavels back from the Democrats. But, first of all, we just saw what ‘reasonable’ establishment Republican politics can do to our country, so we can’t take much solace from the fact that that establishment is taking their cynicism to eleven by playing footsie with these people. Secondly, a bunch of the new Republicans elected this November are going to be certifiably Michele Bachmann-insane. And just like with the Republican Class of 1994, sixteen years later some of the people will be governors and senators.
The Republican Party that impeached Clinton was dangerously insane. They took it up several notches after 9/11. But what we’re witnessing now is of a totally different scale. The parasite has taken over the host.
So, I don’t dismiss these people at all. I think they rank with climate change and nuclear proliferation as threats to humanity. And we have no time to be dicking around arguing over the soul of Barack Obama.
thanks BooMan.
you are correct. they are batshyt crazy.
Thanks again for your voice of reasons. The stakes ARE too high to sulk and pout about policies that are not everything we asked for. I know I am spending the next 4 months to do everything I can to defeat the crazies. The alternative is no mystery: we have already seen the fruits of the GOBPERS’ Labors and they are rotten to the core.
I aim to bring reasons to the Internets.
I’ll be interested to see who in the blogosphere has the president’s back on this one. I predict a lot of crickets.
I’m confused. I thought the right thing to do was to challenge the Arizona/’What About If You Ain’t White, Don’t You Understand?’ Law.
I really do wish they’d tell the truth about those fucking polls.
it’s WHITE PEOPLE who find nothing wrong with the law, because they know it’s not their little Bobby or Jimmy that will be pulled over for NO FUCKING REASON.
are objecting to Obama’s misdirected focus:
This is why Obama is losing the country. He’s directing his energies toward everything BUT what concerns most voters more than anything
else – jobs. Bob Herbert has been hammering away at this for quite a while now.
RTFO
That’s why I said yesterday that the goal for this election is not to change policy but to change the national narrative.
These folks are so dangerous that the treatment they receive at the polls must make Goldwater’s loss in 1964 look like a close election.
National narrative = media narrative.
Media narrative = Murdoch?
No chance, really, to counter the social engineering occurring on that type of scale. The opposing narrative is individual experience of actual real life. And even then ..
National narrative = sum total of common narrative understandings among personal networks
Media is irrelevant in this. Murdoch has influence because an army of committed conservatives back up his assertions at every opportunity they have to in dealing with their personal networks. Not all of their friends, neighbors, co-workers, and family notice that they have gone over the edge compared to their politics 10, 20 years ago.
If progressives don’t have the smarts to end run the corporate media and turn out voters, we don’t deserve to have power because we have no clue about how to go about delivering on our agenda.
Murdoch is a flat-out excuse for inaction.
You tell it!
So, I don’t dismiss these people at all. I think they rank with climate change and nuclear proliferation as threats to humanity.
Serious question: if it’s also true that ‘the establishment GOP doesn’t intend to become the party of Rand Paul’, what exactly is the nature of the threat? Armed insurgency?
that they are not in control anymore.
OK.
Eventually, does the GOP cease to exist?
What is the narrative that brings this particular volatile energy into nuke-style destructive potential? What do you see?
I’m not discounting the danger at all. Uncontrolled or misdirected energy is always dangerous, even in terms of biochemstry ..
Here’s a bad-case scenario:
Republicans force continuation of Afghanistan War and accuse Obama of not “supporting the troops”.
Now a nativist, corporatist, reactionary political party controls all Washington power centers—House, Senate, Supreme Court, White House, Federal Reserve—with no real checks on its power for at least 2-4 years.
I have a good imagination, so I can probably imagine worse scenarios. I don’t think they’re likely; and I don’t think this scenario is likely either. But I do think it’s possible.
…also the lower federal judiciary and the media that the elites use to communicate with each other. Not to mention the “popular” media.
And a government that still has the emergency powers of the PATRIOT ACT and the warrantless wiretapping authorization. And state-controlled National Guard units in the hands of Republican governors.
Concerned yet?
And the knowledge, thanks to 44, that once in power, if they break the law and ignore the Constitution “in the pursuit of liberty” (to paraphrase Goldwater) there will be no legal consequences. They’ve already explained away the political consequences in 06/08 as due to Bush et al not being sufficiently conservative.
Absolutely concerned. Not only that, but I tend to become really, really concerned about things that most other people don’t even think about, since I’m certified looney.
It helps me to have a clear vision of threatening scenarios, or I’m just immobilized with uncontrollable fear. So I ask for specifics.
North Korea is a potential nuclear war waiting to happen. A war with Iran could quickly get out of control and result in a major financial crisis. And antagonizing China or Russia could lead to unpredictable consequences. There are many ways that a party with the brain of Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann or Glenn Beck could imperil everyone. Just through incompetence they’d put us all at risk.
I can’t agree that the party takeover by the “fringe” is new or unprecedented. We had the GOP and a good chunk of the Dems betraying every American idea during the McCarthy era. The “Moral Majority” and its ilk were critical components in Reagan’s election and in his governance.
There is no fringe in the Republican Party, at least not in the last half century or so. Nixon, oddly enough, was probably the last somewhat sane Republican high elected official. Reagan was batshit crazy, but time moves the standard downward to reflect the reality of power. McCain is nuts by any reasonable standard. So were Bush/Cheney. Unless perpetual cognitive dissonance, advocating for obvious frauds (remember the Laffer curve?), and rote denial of ordinary facts do not meet your definition of insane.
However, you hit the nail on the head in the last paragraph: we have never faced so many urgent crises at once, with so little time to address them, as we are now. The no-nothingism of the Palin/McCain/Beck/Limbaugh crowd and their acolytes in Congress is a luxury we can no longer afford. The threats to our ability to survive as a society, and humanity’s prospects for survival as a recognizable species, go far more profound and powerful than even climate change and proliferation. Meeting them will require equally profound changes in our core beliefs about political structures, energy and what’s enough, population policy, and the very nature and purpose of economies. We (unlike Chris Matthews, for example) have no time pretend the birthers, the deniers, the Obama-hates-white-people crowd have some kind of point worthy of discussion. The teapartiers and allied no-nothings are basically barnacles on a ship of state in a hurricane with hardly enough fuel, even under the best conditions, to reach a safe harbor.