Not a bad speech.
At a Memorial Service for the Victims of the Shooting in Tucson, Arizona
University of Arizona, McKale Memorial Center
Tucson, Arizona
January 12, 2011
As Prepared for Delivery—
To the families of those we’ve lost; to all who called them friends; to the students of this university, the public servants gathered tonight, and the people of Tucson and Arizona: I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.
There is nothing I can say that will fill the sudden hole torn in your hearts. But know this: the hopes of a nation are here tonight. We mourn with you for the fallen. We join you in your grief. And we add our faith to yours that Representative Gabrielle Giffords and the other living victims of this tragedy pull through.
As Scripture tells us:
There is a river whose streams make glad the city of God,
the holy place where the Most High dwells.
God is within her, she will not fall;
God will help her at break of day.
On Saturday morning, Gabby, her staff, and many of her constituents gathered outside a supermarket to exercise their right to peaceful assembly and free speech. They were fulfilling a central tenet of the democracy envisioned by our founders – representatives of the people answering to their constituents, so as to carry their concerns to our nation’s capital. Gabby called it “Congress on Your Corner” – just an updated version of government of and by and for the people.
That is the quintessentially American scene that was shattered by a gunman’s bullets. And the six people who lost their lives on Saturday – they too represented what is best in America.
Judge John Roll served our legal system for nearly 40 years. A graduate of this university and its law school, Judge Roll was recommended for the federal bench by John McCain twenty years ago, appointed by President George H.W. Bush, and rose to become Arizona’s chief federal judge. His colleagues described him as the hardest-working judge within the Ninth Circuit. He was on his way back from attending Mass, as he did every day, when he decided to stop by and say hi to his Representative. John is survived by his loving wife, Maureen, his three sons, and his five grandchildren.
George and Dorothy Morris – “Dot” to her friends – were high school sweethearts who got married and had two daughters. They did everything together, traveling the open road in their RV, enjoying what their friends called a 50-year honeymoon. Saturday morning, they went by the Safeway to hear what their Congresswoman had to say. When gunfire rang out, George, a former Marine, instinctively tried to shield his wife. Both were shot. Dot passed away.
A New Jersey native, Phyllis Schneck retired to Tucson to beat the snow. But in the summer, she would return East, where her world revolved around her 3 children, 7 grandchildren, and 2 year-old great-granddaughter. A gifted quilter, she’d often work under her favorite tree, or sometimes sew aprons with the logos of the Jets and the Giants to give out at the church where she volunteered. A Republican, she took a liking to Gabby, and wanted to get to know her better.
Dorwan and Mavy Stoddard grew up in Tucson together – about seventy years ago. They moved apart and started their own respective families, but after both were widowed they found their way back here, to, as one of Mavy’s daughters put it, “be boyfriend and girlfriend again.” When they weren’t out on the road in their motor home, you could find them just up the road, helping folks in need at the Mountain Avenue Church of Christ. A retired construction worker, Dorwan spent his spare time fixing up the church along with their dog, Tux. His final act of selflessness was to dive on top of his wife, sacrificing his life for hers.
Everything Gabe Zimmerman did, he did with passion – but his true passion was people. As Gabby’s outreach director, he made the cares of thousands of her constituents his own, seeing to it that seniors got the Medicare benefits they had earned, that veterans got the medals and care they deserved, that government was working for ordinary folks. He died doing what he loved – talking with people and seeing how he could help. Gabe is survived by his parents, Ross and Emily, his brother, Ben, and his fiancée, Kelly, who he planned to marry next year.
And then there is nine year-old Christina Taylor Green. Christina was an A student, a dancer, a gymnast, and a swimmer. She often proclaimed that she wanted to be the first woman to play in the major leagues, and as the only girl on her Little League team, no one put it past her. She showed an appreciation for life uncommon for a girl her age, and would remind her mother, “We are so blessed. We have the best life.” And she’d pay those blessings back by participating in a charity that helped children who were less fortunate.
Our hearts are broken by their sudden passing. Our hearts are broken – and yet, our hearts also have reason for fullness.
Our hearts are full of hope and thanks for the 13 Americans who survived the shooting, including the congresswoman many of them went to see on Saturday. I have just come from the University Medical Center, just a mile from here, where our friend Gabby courageously fights to recover even as we speak. And I can tell you this – she knows we’re here and she knows we love her and she knows that we will be rooting for her throughout what will be a difficult journey.
And our hearts are full of gratitude for those who saved others. We are grateful for Daniel Hernandez, a volunteer in Gabby’s office who ran through the chaos to minister to his boss, tending to her wounds to keep her alive. We are grateful for the men who tackled the gunman as he stopped to reload. We are grateful for a petite 61 year-old, Patricia Maisch, who wrestled away the killer’s ammunition, undoubtedly saving some lives. And we are grateful for the doctors and nurses and emergency medics who worked wonders to heal those who’d been hurt.
These men and women remind us that heroism is found not only on the fields of battle. They remind us that heroism does not require special training or physical strength. Heroism is here, all around us, in the hearts of so many of our fellow citizens, just waiting to be summoned – as it was on Saturday morning.
Their actions, their selflessness, also pose a challenge to each of us. It raises the question of what, beyond the prayers and expressions of concern, is required of us going forward. How can we honor the fallen? How can we be true to their memory?
You see, when a tragedy like this strikes, it is part of our nature to demand explanations – to try to impose some order on the chaos, and make sense out of that which seems senseless. Already we’ve seen a national conversation commence, not only about the motivations behind these killings, but about everything from the merits of gun safety laws to the adequacy of our mental health systems. Much of this process, of debating what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the future, is an essential ingredient in our exercise of self-government.
But at a time when our discourse has become so sharply polarized – at a time when we are far too eager to lay the blame for all that ails the world at the feet of those who think differently than we do – it’s important for us to pause for a moment and make sure that we are talking with each other in a way that heals, not a way that wounds.
Scripture tells us that there is evil in the world, and that terrible things happen for reasons that defy human understanding. In the words of Job, “when I looked for light, then came darkness.” Bad things happen, and we must guard against simple explanations in the aftermath.
For the truth is that none of us can know exactly what triggered this vicious attack. None of us can know with any certainty what might have stopped those shots from being fired, or what thoughts lurked in the inner recesses of a violent man’s mind.
So yes, we must examine all the facts behind this tragedy. We cannot and will not be passive in the face of such violence. We should be willing to challenge old assumptions in order to lessen the prospects of violence in the future.
But what we can’t do is use this tragedy as one more occasion to turn on one another. As we discuss these issues, let each of us do so with a good dose of humility. Rather than pointing fingers or assigning blame, let us use this occasion to expand our moral imaginations, to listen to each other more carefully, to sharpen our instincts for empathy, and remind ourselves of all the ways our hopes and dreams are bound together.
After all, that’s what most of us do when we lose someone in our family – especially if the loss is unexpected. We’re shaken from our routines, and forced to look inward. We reflect on the past. Did we spend enough time with an aging parent, we wonder. Did we express our gratitude for all the sacrifices they made for us? Did we tell a spouse just how desperately we loved them, not just once in awhile but every single day?
So sudden loss causes us to look backward – but it also forces us to look forward, to reflect on the present and the future, on the manner in which we live our lives and nurture our relationships with those who are still with us. We may ask ourselves if we’ve shown enough kindness and generosity and compassion to the people in our lives. Perhaps we question whether we are doing right by our children, or our community, and whether our priorities are in order. We recognize our own mortality, and are reminded that in the fleeting time we have on this earth, what matters is not wealth, or status, or power, or fame – but rather, how well we have loved, and what small part we have played in bettering the lives of others.
That process of reflection, of making sure we align our values with our actions – that, I believe, is what a tragedy like this requires. For those who were harmed, those who were killed – they are part of our family, an American family 300 million strong. We may not have known them personally, but we surely see ourselves in them. In George and Dot, in Dorwan and Mavy, we sense the abiding love we have for our own husbands, our own wives, our own life partners. Phyllis – she’s our mom or grandma; Gabe our brother or son. In Judge Roll, we recognize not only a man who prized his family and doing his job well, but also a man who embodied America’s fidelity to the law. In Gabby, we see a reflection of our public spiritedness, that desire to participate in that sometimes frustrating, sometimes contentious, but always necessary and never-ending process to form a more perfect union.
And in Christina…in Christina we see all of our children. So curious, so trusting, so energetic and full of magic.
So deserving of our love.
And so deserving of our good example. If this tragedy prompts reflection and debate, as it should, let’s make sure it’s worthy of those we have lost. Let’s make sure it’s not on the usual plane of politics and point scoring and pettiness that drifts away with the next news cycle.
The loss of these wonderful people should make every one of us strive to be better in our private lives – to be better friends and neighbors, co-workers and parents. And if, as has been discussed in recent days, their deaths help usher in more civility in our public discourse, let’s remember that it is not because a simple lack of civility caused this tragedy, but rather because only a more civil and honest public discourse can help us face up to our challenges as a nation, in a way that would make them proud. It should be because we want to live up to the example of public servants like John Roll and Gabby Giffords, who knew first and foremost that we are all Americans, and that we can question each other’s ideas without questioning each other’s love of country, and that our task, working together, is to constantly widen the circle of our concern so that we bequeath the American dream to future generations.
I believe we can be better. Those who died here, those who saved lives here – they help me believe. We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us. I believe that for all our imperfections, we are full of decency and goodness, and that the forces that divide us are not as strong as those that unite us.
That’s what I believe, in part because that’s what a child like Christina Taylor Green believed. Imagine: here was a young girl who was just becoming aware of our democracy; just beginning to understand the obligations of citizenship; just starting to glimpse the fact that someday she too might play a part in shaping her nation’s future. She had been elected to her student council; she saw public service as something exciting, something hopeful. She was off to meet her congresswoman, someone she was sure was good and important and might be a role model. She saw all this through the eyes of a child, undimmed by the cynicism or vitriol that we adults all too often just take for granted.
I want us to live up to her expectations. I want our democracy to be as good as she imagined it. All of us – we should do everything we can to make sure this country lives up to our children’s expectations.
Christina was given to us on September 11th, 2001, one of 50 babies born that day to be pictured in a book called “Faces of Hope.” On either side of her photo in that book were simple wishes for a child’s life. “I hope you help those in need,” read one. “I hope you know all of the words to the National Anthem and sing it with your hand over your heart. I hope you jump in rain puddles.”
If there are rain puddles in heaven, Christina is jumping in them today. And here on Earth, we place our hands over our hearts, and commit ourselves as Americans to forging a country that is forever worthy of her gentle, happy spirit.
May God bless and keep those we’ve lost in restful and eternal peace. May He love and watch over the survivors. And may He bless the United States of America.
Not in the prepared remarks but delivered in the speech was the news that shortly after Barack and Michelle Obama visited Gabby Giffords’s hospital room she opened her eyes for the first time. Very good news.
The president is a better person than I am, and thank god for that. I can try to live up to his challenge, but I can’t let certain things go. He’s right about humility. He’s right about expanding our moral imagination. He’s right about all of it. But we’re in a pitched political battle. We’re living in a country where one party routinely uses images of violence and intimidation. The president must know this. He knows he wasn’t born in Kenya and that he isn’t a Bolshevik or Nazi. He knows how busy the Secret Service is. And he knows that the Republicans have rejected and will continue to reject all of his generous overtures. So, I’ll try to align my values with my actions and listen to my better angels, but I’m still going to point fingers where they need to be pointed.
It was a great speech. My (Obama Republican) dad sobbed through much of it.
Brit Hume was on FOX saying that the opening prayer might mean something to “his people” but it was “damn peculiar” and that he blessed the lizards.
That’s odd. I thought he’d appreciate a blessing for people like him.
that was classic Tucson and it brought tears to my friend & my eyes at the watering hole two lights away from the stadium. Traditionally, the crowd moves to face the direction that is invoked in the prayer. We did that in the crowd with no remorse. The tone was exactly what Tucson needed to hear.
As for the lizards, we either bless them or they’ll remind us that we have encroached on their territory 😉
Tomorrow just wait — the meme the GOP will push is that Obama went to far in what he said, that he was the purveyor of hate speech directed at them, and that they are the victims.
Trust me.
Being a conservative implies an attachment to the old, the familiar, the tested, the tried and true.
Expect to hear “Wellstone” a lot.
Yes and the louder the screams, the more you know that Obama connected with the American people.
And they are going to go at full tilt shitstorm between now and the State of the Union. Just put on your raincoat and sou’wester and goggles and get the shower ready — and watch.
They’ll over-reach. They always over-reach. It takes longer than any of us like, longer than we can stand, almost, but they do.
You can win elections with 100% of 35% of the people, but you can’t do much else.
Not bad? Damn, BooMan lol. I thought it was the best one he’s given since becoming president.
Like I continue to tell myself, he’s the president this country doesn’t deserve, so your ending paragraph rings true, too.
The line that rung out to me the most:
RFK could have said that.
I have no higher praise.
His job is to be the President of all the people, whether they want him to or not. His standing and saying what he did in the context that he did with the people that he was with and the heavy religious and patriotic overtones that come only with memorial services calls to repentance those whom you likely would point fingers at. That burns them more than any finger-pointing you could do. Watch for the howls tomorrow. But it will be interesting to watch what McCain, Kyl, Barrasso, and Brewer say and do with reference to this event. Napolitano wasn’t there just because she was a former governor of Arizona; Holder’s presence there sends that message. Napolitano was there as Secretary of Homeland Security.
Your and our job is to make the case for progressive policies. Part of that is honestly understanding the current toxic political environment, something that the President most likely does confidentially with his staff.
From November of 2008 until now, the shrillness of the Republican spokespeople has increased in proportion to his overtures. He is driving them nuts; of course, he is driving progressives nuts as well for policy reasons. He now has them where they weren’t before; they share responsibility for the fate of the country. Demonstrably.
After tonight, I think the State of the Union address is going to be very interesting to watch, and it will be very interesting to watch the Republican reaction during the speech. Will the GOP pull a Joe Wilson again? Will Obama be pointed about Scalia’s views on equal rights?
Our pain right now has to do with the fact that all the contradictions in the American economy, politics, and culture are intensifying. We know that there will be a new situation shortly, but we are scared about what that new situation will be. The pressures on the system are immense and the transformation uncertain. It might be helpful to read about the state of politics in the Soviet Union around 1987-1988.
Well put!!
Great speech and I almost cried when he was talking about little 9 year old girl. It is just too much emotionally and you feel empathy of the pain of her loved ones.
Oh, meanwhile, the right is bitching about T-shirts at the service and how people should not have cheered. Also, Reagan’s speech after Challenger was much more of a respectful memorial than this one and White House should have prevented crowd from applauding until after it was over.
Honestly, I wish that I made that previous paragraph up.
Right, it’s not appropriate to applaud during such a speech, it deflects deep feeling and plays into sentimentality, which Obama’s words and delivery encouraged. It just goes to show how the old sense of decorum has deteriorated—for better or for worse, note also the political vitriol.
It was perfectly right to applaud. This was not a funeral mass. And it was not a memorial service alone, although that’s how the media framed it. It was a time to heal the Tucson community and the nation, and that required that it do several things at once. It had to memorialize the dead, encourage the survivors, honor the heroes, and state a common purpose. The applause was loudest and most sustained during the recognition of the heroes, and what was going on although hard to see was the family members of those who were injured or killed hugging those heroes (which intensified the applause).
The applause during Obama’s comments about how to heal after this were 26,000 inhabitants of Tucson declaring to Arizona and the world their determination to bring unity to their community and the nation.
Finally, tapes of this event no doubt will be played for the survivors. And it will come off to them as one huge Get Well card from the people of Tucson.
The decorum police generally have political agendas one way or the other that encourage them to run down any event of this kind. This event was a demonstration of how a living culture, not dead rules of decorum deal with a complex tragedy.
No I don’t have a political agenda in this instance. I thought it was obscene. That’s all. I’d say it’s better to feel and experience hurt and loss to the bitter dregs instead of covering it up with infantile Oprah-ish applause and shouting. That’s all. I can appreciate that think differently. Can you imagine, I’ve even become one of the police—please.
I’m really upset about defining everything as liberal and conservative. It is actually a waste of time because an individual has some tendencies described as liberal some as conservative. That person would be someone that I would describe as “normal”. However, I have not heard of any well armed groups defined as liberal in the last forty years. If I were to walk across America I don’t think I would find any well armed group admitting that it is liberal. For some reason I don’t think that is an accident. We are strangely petrified about any social or communistic idea. Yet our wealthy few are isolating themselves in gated communities these days and I don’t think that is a very good idea. They are creating a climate that might lead to a backlash of violence from those not so able. We need to address the widening gap between the rich and poor with some much needed taxing on the greediest bunch of fools since the early 1900s. Taxing them fairly is a very good way to avoid any violence against them. There certainly are other ways to avoid promoting violence that we should use…for me soundly staffing our independent regulatory agencies would be a priority. For example the FCC should be reviewing licensing of radio/TV owners that are irresponsible. Notice I did not call them conservative or liberal!
I agree with everything that you have written, particularly about taxing the wealthy in a fairer fashion. I think the super rich especially are locked in a crusade to have the idea of progressive taxation just disappear. This is one of the reasons they quietly fund dissident groups like the tea-baggers who, naturally, have difficulty in grasping such vital concepts as a more equitable distribution of the wealth. I agree also that the FCC should do a better job on the licensing of radio/TV owners. And, would it be possible to ever return to the fairness doctrine of times past to handle such obvious gasbags as Glenn Beck and Russ Limbaugh?
The well-armed groups from forty years ago weren’t liberal and weren’t called liberal at the time. Those well-armed groups like the Black Panthers and the Weather Underground were self-styled radical leftists. The liberals were the ones who for ten years marched in candlelight processions in support of peace (or liberals like Scoop Jackson and Hubert Humphrey, who supported the war).
We are petrified about “communism” or “socialism” because the Republican Party after World War II use those terms as wedge issues to pry away support from Democrats. From the 1946 election that delivered a Republican Congress to the election of Ronald Reagan took 34 years of well-financed propaganda by wealthy wildcatters like H. L. Hunt and the elder Koch, intellectual “redemption” of conservatism by folks like William Buckley, the fear tactics of Joseph McCarthy and most importantly J. Edgar Hoover (it kept his job important and let him avoid dealing with organized crime), and the 16-year single-minded drive by the movement conservatives born out of the backlash to the civil rights movement. Relentless, repetitive, propaganda with the collusion of the media; and the few scary events like the blockade of Berlin, the fall of Eastern Europe to Soviet imperialism and the Cuban Missile Crisis and losing the Vietnam War, the contrast that preachers made between “godless communism” and “godly Christian Americanism” — daily, weekly, monthly, annually, for four decades had its effect on American culture.
It is no accident, and it was funded by an large by the wealthy who opposed FDR.
Highly progressive taxation with strong enforcement can have a number of beneficial effects. It disincentivizes actions that increase the gap between rich and poor; we saw that from the 1930s to the 1970s. It makes fraud less profitable; medical providers for example have less incentive to defraud Medicare if those ill-gotten gains will just be taxed away. And today the only way you can hide income is by stuffing it in a mattress as cash.
The globalization of the economy complicates this. The IRS would have to stop the leakage of income to Swiss bank accounts and Cayman Island tax shelters, for example. Or there would have to be a global agreement to standards of taxation. And it is the global gap between rich and poor that allows corporations to arbitrage wages across national boundaries–most strikingly for the US, the case of Mexico.
I got a copy of the speech from YouTube and converted it to mp3 so I could listen to it, and in the process lost any video footage of the crowd and whatever visual impressions that might have conveyed, but I have to say, the frequent applause, whistling, shouting, etc, struck me as more than a little out of place for such a solemn occasion.
I don’t have a problem with cheering the survivors, the heroes of the day or the brief words describing the lives of those people we lost, and no matter what else I find discordant about the audience reaction, I don’t blame the president for it; it truly was an excellent speech, imo, but I found myself at times shaking my head at the impression that by and large the crowd sounded like they were at a campaign event, or a rally, or anything other than a memorial for fallen citizens. They sounded happy, even. I wonder if I had lost a loved one in that shooting whether I would have made it through the event without having to take an early leave.
And of course I knew as soon as the thought occured to me that this would be a theme for the rightwing to run rampant with at the first opportunity. I mean, given their outrageous response to Senator Wellstone’s memorial, it’s not hard to imagine what kind of mileage they’re going to squeeze from this speech.
I don’t know what to make of it, but that was my honest impression. I just found the crowd response inappropriate, on the whole. Like I said, I don’t blame anyone in particular for it, but it sure seemed odd given the gravity of the occasion.
The university organized the event.
Also, see my comment above.
I wasn’t pointing any fingers at event organizers–I don’t even see what difference it makes who organized what. And the comment you referenced wasn’t there when I wrote my comment, so thanks for the added info. I hope the overall balance works out as you suggest. It does help to have the visual cues for some of the applause lines. Also, it was definitely billed as a “memorial” for the fallen, so if that’s not accurate, that’s good to know too.
I’m not in the decorum police, not a concern troll, and while my record here is pretty scant, it goes back some years and I’ll stand by every word of it. I just had to express my reaction on hearing the audio, because it was too much to suppress. Six people, among them a 9-year-old girl shot dead, contrasted with the particular energy apparent in this crowd seemed a bit off.
Let me repeat, it was a good job by President Obama all around, and done in a way that only he could have pulled off (and no, that’s not intended as a backhanded insult, I mean he did a great job). I guess it’s impossible to be happy with everything at a time like this. It’s probably just me.
I can certainly understand how some of those things might be perceived. And you are certainly not out of line to express how it made you feel.
It is hard to know how any one individual is affected when something like this happens in ones own backyard. One thing that I have tried to do in my life with respect to how people react to tragedy is to allow every individual the latitude to deal with it in their own particular fashion. I have been to my share of funerals, visitations and memorials where those most affected by someones death have not shed a tear. And others where loved ones were smiling and upbeat. And still others where the grief was open and profound. And in none of these cases did I feel that I was within my rights to judge whether any of these varied reactions were appropriate. Though I have heard many try to that very thing, as I am sure you have.
This audience was made up largely of people who were likely within relatively close proximity to what happened that dreadful day. Certainly much closer that most all of us. Like I mentioned, this happened in their back yard. And I really don’t feel like I have any justification to tell them how to react when the events are so proximate to them, so recent and so emotionally raw.
If there had been busloads of people brought in from all over the country or if this had been a situation where the audience was made up mostly of invited partisan guests and individuals irrelevant to the tragedy, I could see how one might question the reactions by the crowd. But these were people who live there, who saw their neighbors and friends gunned down in a place they called home. Much like those who lived in Manhattan on September 11, I think they have a right to deal with the events as they see fit. And to mourn and react in any they feel necessary to come to terms with this horrific action. I live 1500 miles away from Tucson, and though I don’t know anyone there, I can tell you the grief and sadness I felt was very deep and profound. I am willing to give the people there wide and generous latitude in how they themselves react.
Looked from the video that there were a large number of students and young ppl, which is good, and the cheering and applause was from them. I would not expect solemnity from them because, imo, they would be experiencing tremendous confusion and fear about their future, maybe channel that into cheering the heroes, especially their own Daniel Hernandez, and want the speech to open up a meaningful interpretation of the events and way forward for them. The speech was great b/c it does all the things Tarheeldem stated. The heroes are amazing and little Cristina just heartbreaking. The speech recognized Cristina beautifully and appropriately. (think for a minute what Guiliani would have said about her; Sarah P ventured in to that territory btw in her vimeo)