It’s kind of interesting to wade into the fetid waters of Lunaticville to see how they’re reacting to the news that real Republicans represent Wall Street, and Tea Baggers are merely their (mostly) useful idiots. Look, this isn’t complicated. There are a few very wealthy people in this country and there are hundreds of millions of…well…everyone else. Very wealthy people have a particular set of concerns. They would like to keep the money they have and they’d like to set the optimal conditions for them to make much more money. In this, they’re not really much different than the rest of us, but their behavior can have an outsized impact on all kinds of things, like the integrity of investments or the quality and safety of products or the healthiness of the air and water or the kind of compensation we receive as their employees. Very frequently, our interests conflict with their interests. They’re badly outnumbered, so they should expect to lose political arguments pretty much all the time. But they have money. Lots and lots of money. And they use that money to create political speech and political outcomes. But speech isn’t enough. They need votes. And the only way for them to get enough votes to have their interests reach parity with ours is to align themselves with some other large segment of the population. In our recent history, this has been religious conservatives and, especially, Southerners who still retain an unhealthy contempt for the Federal government that beat them in the Civil War. There’s also another group of people, usually called libertarians, who are basically cheerleaders for rich fat cats not out of any particular self-interest but probably as a result of some quirky protein produced by their DNA in utero. Who knows what is wrong with these people? Most of them were born on third base, think they hit a triple, and are really pissed that they haven’t yet scored. They blame empathy. And Al Sharpton.
Now, you can believe political rhetoric or you can believe your lying eyes. Republicans run up huge deficits whenever they have the power to do so, and they loot the treasury to enrich themselves and their political donors. That is literally what real Republicans live to do. That’s the party’s entire purpose. The deficits are not really the primary goal. They’re a byproduct of their desire to pay the lowest possible taxes while steering the maximum amount of the government’s money to their rich pals. The deficits do serve a purpose however. Once bounced from power, the Republicans behave as though it was the Democrats who produced those deficits. And they pound the Democrats to cut social programs that steer government money away from their rich pals to people who are in need of some assistance.
This is how American politics work in our two-party system. Anyone who rallied to the Republican Party because they wanted to see them fix the deficit problem is not paying attention to how our system operates. Mitch McConnell doesn’t want to do away with earmarks. He doesn’t want a balanced budget amendment. Those things would interfere with his ability to steer our tax money where he wants it to go. A Republican Party that couldn’t run up massive deficits would have no real reason to exist anymore.
If you joined the Tea Party because you want to see lower taxes on millionaires and less regulation of business, then good; you’re on solid ground. But if you joined because you want smaller government and a balanced budget, you made a grave mistake. The thing about greedheads is that they have no moral qualms about ripping you off and selling you out. They’re almost sociopathic by definition. I mean, who attacks empathy? That should be your first clue that you’re on your own.
If you are getting well paid to be an idiot, more power to you. This is America. But if you actually believed that John Boehner and Mitch McConnell want to transform the government into some Galtian paradise, you’re just a sucker. Plain and simple.
I don’t. Fuck them. Look at the second comment. It’s about how horrible Boehner is because we supposedly can’t buy incandescent light bulbs anymore.
Oh, sorry: well-written piece, and I’ll be sure to share it tomorrow.
Epic. Burn.
A suffinct, outstanding summary of the purpose and focus of the Republican Party.
That said, it’s important to remember that the Tea Party didn’t start out as a Republican subsidiary. Republican operatives latched on to it and poured money into it, but it started as an independent, populist impulse. Those voices (a mix of libertarians and unfocused anger at both parties because life in America isn’t what we were promised) were drowned out by the astroturfers, but it should be no surprise to anyone who signed up for the original Tea Party that they’ve been betrayed by the two party system. That was a big part of their anger in the first place.
It will be very interesting to see where the 2010 Congressional Class of True Believers lands. Is their loyalty to the people who voted them in, or to the people who financed their campaigns and now hand out those nice DC perks? History would bet on the latter. It took about three hours to seduce the Class of 1994, which produced an outsized share of indictments for corruption and scandal over subsequent years. I bet the same thing happens this time.
There are plenty of Democrats who treat their base like useful idiots, too. That’s why the original Tea Party movement had more than a little appeal to some independents and libertarian-oriented progressives. There’s going to be far less enthusiasm for Obama on the left and a lot of “a pox on both their houses” across the board in 2012. Wouldn’t surprise me at all if the R’s ram through an establishment nominee, but whether it’s that or someone Crazee, pickings will be ripe for a well-supported independent run.
…it’s important to remember that the Tea Party didn’t start out as a Republican subsidiary…
I don’t believe this. I think the evidence indicates the Tea Party was a prefab marketing gambit that initially sucked in racists who sobbed, “I want MY COUNTRY back!” Where did it come from? Remember those Palin rallies that brought out “Don’t Tread on Me” and Rebel flags? Weren’t these people already Republican-inclined & some PR guys said, “Hey, let’s organize these rubes” and put ’em on buses? I know of a early joiner who is a libertarian-Republican who just happens to enjoy being in Revolutionary War battle re-enactments and, oh boy, he’s embarrassed about his involvement now.
Yep. They were clearly and rapidly astroturfed by right wing big money after the initial Santelli surge.
The original Tea Party goes back before Santelli. It was part of Ron Paul’s 2008 campaign.
That nobody knows this is testament to just how thoroughly it was coopted and redirected – and to just how vulnerable libertarians are to exploited by anyone who pays them even the slightest positive attention.
I agree it goes back before Santelli — the initial web sites that showed up at the same time as the supposedly impromptu Santelli rant were registered shortly after Obama won the Democratic nomination, as I recall. It’s pretty clear from the extensive coverage the Tea Party got from early 2009, despite the tepid rally attendance they got relative to some other causes, that this was a very well funded and organized media campaign.
But I believe that shows that this was an astroturf organization all along. I don’t think it’s fair to say that the Tea Party was from Ron Paul’s campaign. Granted there is a lot over overlap between Paul supporters and the Tea Party, but there is a also a difference. Ron Paul is the kind of politician that everyone agrees with at least part of the time. For example, my local Ron Paul campaign office (here in fundie central Colorado) gave out some bumper stickers that would piss off a typical Tea Partier, such as “When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross” and “Focus on your own damn family”.
Ron Paul himself has, as is usual for him, avoided following the Tea Party/GOP orthodoxy on many occasions and spoke basic truths. Such as pointing out that Obama is not a Marxist, he is a Corporatist, and noting that this was true of most of the leaders of both parties. (This is why Fox and others try to avoid media coverage for Ron Paul.)
Oh, and to the point: real libertarians don’t sell out. Sure, there are LINOs, or those who try to co-opt the L label to promote themselves. But most R’s who claim libertarian ideology fail miserably in meeting the basics of the philosophy. The media, both politician and financial, seem equally inept at being able to properly use the term — e.g. you constantly see people referring to the banking system prior to the crisis as a free market fiasco that discredits libertarian ideology. Obviously the writer knows little about libertarian / free market / Austrian Economic ideology, or they otherwise wouldn’t make the mistake. OR, they’re deliberately trying to obfuscate the problem in order to undermine those ideologies from gaining traction by false accusation.
This libertarian was initially amused by the Tea Party. I’d clarify that many RP supporters never bought into the Tea Party, especially once it was clear that the Corporatist / Big Govt. / Empire NeoConn R’s were jumping in to head the parade as best they could.
As for the racism element, no doubt some racists go to the Tea Party… but its too broad a brush to paint and oversimplifies the Tea Party. Maybe it works in an attempt to tar them, but operating as if it’s completely true will undermine your effectiveness.
FWIW, I’ve encountered plenty of racism among the blue collared D crowd. Don’t hold that idiocy against D’s or Progressives as a whole, though. Idiots are idiots.
.
My recent diary – John Birchers Rejuvenate Within FreedomWorks Tea Party
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
One of the best pieces you’ve written, BooMan. Exceptionally well put-together.
Seconded! This was the right thing to say, at the right time. Very nice, Martin.
This. Ditto. Concise, direct analysis Martin. <applause>
I agree. I “liked” it several hours ago but it never showed up…so your Facebook interface isn’t working. Just FYI, don’t know if you can do anything about it.
Very nice. I think you deserve an early retirement with a $150,000 a year pension!
These are the same deluded idiots who thought Palin would make a wonderful President, you betcha! They’re a grifter’s dream, a pack of yammering fools and ignorant suckers, and given how much damage they’ve done, I say they deserve every screwing over they get from the greedheads who’ve been using them.
And who knows? Maybe some of them will stagger free of the propaganda haze and finally figure out who the real enemy is.
.
Very familiar to recent failed attempt to please his masters …
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
It’s a little early for this piece. Just the other day, we were afraid Republicans were about to ignore the moneyed interests of the party and crash the economy purely for the sake of the tea party voters. I’m going to wait until the debt ceiling issue is past before indulging in schadenfreude. Even then, I’ll be too relieved the danger is past to worry much about them. Ideally, this will be perceived as a big enough betrayal by the hard right wing that Republicans will lose some of their advantage in turnout in the next election.
One of the bizarre gems in the eventful past few days, Orrin Hatch’s reference to Gilligan’s Island ???!!! – I didn’t understand why he brought up Gilligan’s Island. was he reaching for an example of a lovable millionaire?? a counter to the Koch bros image? or is this a bad millionaire? or one who can afford to be taxed? (has no expenses because he’s stuck on the island). for whom is Gilligan’s Island a pertinent current image? (how about the historic GOS pie fight?)
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/07/hatch-envokes-thurston-howell-iii-says-he-doesnt-want-to-
tax-truly-poor-video.php
sorry, forgot link
This conflict was due sooner rather than later (especially with Bachmann making such a strong showing thus far), and I’ve always questioned how the GOP as it stands today can have BOTH the turnout AND the money from the two respective branches of their supporters.
It is not a given that Tea Partiers generally won’t turn out for a Romney in the same numbers as the 2010 elections, and that financial backing for a Bachmann will have to come from grassroots rather than big money that likes Huntsman and Romney more.
It is unfortunate that this show down is happening on the footstep of the debt ceiling needing to be raised, and is threatening the first default of our nation’s history.
Bullseye.
you’re way nicer on those clowns than you should be, BooMan.
Absolutely agree. I’ll pass on part of an email I sent my brother last week:
We have a winner take all system, i.e. not parliamentary. If the Democrats get 50% of the electoral college plus one, they get the entire presidency. There are political science papers on why this means we have two, and only two, parties, and that parties are best understood as coalitions of interest seekers. Which is to say it is the donors and lobbyists that define the party, not the politicians or voters.
The Republican Party in the last many decades has been the party of established wealth and power. Counting family members, other dependents, loyal servitors, hangers on, and wannabes; that’s still like <1% of the population. So they have to get a large number of dupes to vote for them, despite not representing their interests. Used to be able to buy votes. Still can through advertising. But you have to give them some rationale. This requires lying. Usually lying based on religion or xenophobia. Examples abound.
So what are the Democrats? Basically, as noted, the system requires two parties and the Democrats are the Washington Generals.
This has become much worse since the mid seventies. Corporate involvement has become much larger and more effective. I cannot too highly recommend Hacker and Pierson, “Winner Take All Politics”. Right now all wealthy gops care about are their own taxes and subsidies and regulation of their corporations. Boehner’s corporate sponsors need stable financial conditions. They want the debt ceiling raised. But as they’ve come to more and more represent only a few thousand rich people, they’ve had to get more extreme with the religion and xenophobia, and they’ve attracted a large group of dupes who are threatening to actually have some say. My immediate fear is that “Leader” Boehner can’t control his Tea Party troops and we may well do something crazy. My long term fear is that we are becoming a corporate oligopoly. We’re well on the path to becoming a poorer, meaner country.
The TP guys fear a paranoid fantasy about Kenyan islamofascist socialists. I see my fears reported in the paper every day.