What’s bigger? Chris Christie’s girth or Newt Gingrich’s self-regard?
About The Author
![BooMan](https://www.progresspond.com/wp-content/uploads/avatars/4/5cb7b5e70662b-bpfull.png)
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
9 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
Man, that’s a softball question…
Christie’s girth is limited by the mass of the planet Earth, while Gingrich’s ego encompasses the entire Universe….
..and, like the Universe, primarily consists of vacuum and hot gas.
I had a similar response, though one which adhered more closely to actually-existing laws of physics. I need to be quicker next time.
I read on another site that there are rumors that Christie is boffing Ann Coulter.
Is that physically possible? I mean I doubt he has even seen his manhood in the last ten years.
You are cruel to bring that visual to this conversation. That’s just wrong.
It was posted by a right wing nutter who was saying why he didn’t think Christie could win. Seriously.
No contest.
You can cram Christie’s girth into pants or a circus tent. Newt’s self-regard is uncontainable.
You forgot Santorum’s self-pity.
And yet Christie is behind so much, ahem, belt-tightening.
Yeah, and it’s not his belt. He cut money from public assistance because the $140 per month is too much.