Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., would have been 83 this year. He has been dead for longer than he was alive. As his living memory fades, replaced by a feel-good “I have a dream” whitewash that ignores much of what he stood for and fought against, it’s more important than ever to recapture the true history of Dr. King — because much of what he fought against is resurfacing or still with us today.
King, the man, was, along with Mohandas Gandhi, one of the two most internationally revered symbols of nonviolence in the 20th century. He spent his too-brief adult life defying authority and convention, citing a higher moral authority, and gave hope and inspiration for the liberation of people of color on six continents.
King is not a global icon because he believed in diversity trainings and civic ceremonies, or because he had a nice dream. He is remembered because he took serious risks to his own life (and eventually lost it) fighting for a higher cause. King is also remembered because, among a number of brave and committed civil rights leaders and activists, he had a flair for self-promotion, a style that also appealed to white liberals, and the extraordinary social strength of the black Southern churches behind him.
What little history TV will give us around King’s holiday this year is at least as much about forgetting as about remembering, as much about self-congratulatory patriotism that King was American as self-examination that American racism made him necessary and that government, at every level, sought to destroy him. We hear “I have a dream”; we don’t hear his powerful indictments of poverty, the Vietnam War, and the military-industrial complex.
We see Bull Connor in Birmingham; we don’t see arrests for fighting segregated housing in Chicago, or the years of beatings and busts before he won the Nobel Peace Prize. We don’t hear about the mainstream American contempt at the time for King, even after that Peace Prize, nor the FBI harassment or his reputation among conservatives as a Commie dupe.
(cont’d)
We don’t see retrospectives on King’s linkage of civil rights with Third World liberation. We forget that he died in Memphis lending support for a union (the garbage workers’ strike), while organizing a multi-racial Poor Peoples’ Campaign that demanded affordable housing and decent-paying jobs as basic civil rights transcending skin color. We forget that many of King’s fellow leaders weren’t nearly so polite. Cities were burning. We remember Selma instead.
And we forget that of those many dreams King had, only one — equal access for non-whites — is significantly realized today. More than half-century after the Montgomery bus boycott catapulted a 26-year-old King into national prominence, even that is only partly achieved. Blacks are being systematically disenfranchised in our elections, and affirmative action and school desegregation are all but dead. Urban school districts across the country these days are as segregated and unequal as ever. A conservative majority on the US Supreme Court has helped usher in a new era where possible redress for discrimination is steadily whittled away. Our prison populations are disproportionate non-white, and our law enforcement agencies are too often temples of institutionalized racism. Economic indices in the U.S., broken down by race and ethnicity, are an appalling joke.
Sure, gifted African-Americans like Barack Obama can achieve at a level unthinkable in King’s day. But the better test of a society’s colorblindness (or gender equity) is not how the most talented of each race or gender fare, but how the mediocre do. A black mediocrity like George W. Bush could still never, ever become President of the United States.
An even bigger problem with how we celebrate King’s legacy, as a generation dies off and the historical memory fades, is that MLK has become an icon, not a historical figure (distorted or otherwise). History requires context; icons don’t. The racism King challenged four and five decades ago in Georgia and Alabama was also dominant throughout the country. Here in Seattle, few whites know that history: the housing and school segregation, laws barring Asians from owning land (overturned only in the ’60s), the marches downtown from predominantly black Garfield High School, police harassment of both radical and mainstream black activists, the still-unsolved assassination of a local NAACP leader.
Every city in America has such histories. We don’t know the stories of the people, some still with us, who led those struggles. And we rarely acknowledge that the overt racism of Montgomery 1955 is no longer so overt, but still part of America 2012. It shows up in our geography, in our jails, in our schools, in our voting booths, in our shelters and food banks, in our economy, in our law enforcement, and in the very earnest and extremely white activist groups — hello, Occupy Movement — that often carry the banner (or not) on these issues.
Opponents of affirmative action and racial equality can claim King’s mantle and “if he were alive today” approval only because in 2012, pop culture’s MLK has no politics. And, for that matter, no faith. For white America, King’s soft-focus image often reinforces white supremacism. “See? We’re not so bad. We honor him now. Why don’t those people just get over it, anyway? We did.”
All that is a lie. Dr. King’s vision is today as urgent as ever. While Jim Crow and the cruelties of overt segregation are now largely unimaginable, much remains to be done. And the moral outrage of Americans, that made King’s work so politically effective? We don’t do that any more. We can torture thousands of mostly innocent Iraqis and Afghans, in plain sight, and nobody is held accountable. A sheriff in Arizona can target Latinos for years and, untouched by the feds, be considered a hero for it by his racist fans. It’d take a whole lot more than Bull Connor’s police dogs to make the news today.
The saddest loss in the modern narrative of Dr. King’s career is the story of who he was: a man without wealth, without elected office, who managed as a single individual to change the world simply through the strength of his moral convictions. His power came from his faith, and his willingness to act on what he knew to be right. That story could inspire many millions to similar action — if only it were told. We could each be Dr. King.
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., nonviolent martyr to reconciliation and justice, has become a Hallmark Card, a warm, fuzzy, feel-good invocation of neighborliness, a literally whitewashed file photo for sneakers or soda commercials, a reprieve for post-holiday shoppers, an excuse for a three-day weekend, a cardboard cutout used for photo ops by dissembling politicians of all colors.
Dr. King deserves better. We all do.
If we all could be King for a day, what could we accomplish?
Nice Article,I really liked this. The information that you have shared here is very nice and i was not aware of all these things about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. But i know that he was a great person. Thanks for sharing.
.
Occupy was recognized with the Word of the Year Award in 2011. Innovative move by MLK and his associates in 1963 in confrontation with Bull Connor. MLK was fortunate to do battle with local authority and not in conjunction with a federal Homeland Security apparatchik.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
I agree with much of what you say here. Although, for example, the nonviolent revolutions around the world over the past 40 years (the Arab Spring, Optor in Serbia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, Charter 77 and Solidarity and the fall of the Berlin Wall, the overthrow of Marcos in the Philippines, Mandela’s liberation and rise to power in South Africa, the Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland—I could go on…) would not have happened, or at least, would not have happened the way they did without the example of Dr. King and the American Civil Rights Movement.
Also worth remembering today, is the organizing campaign that led to over 6 million (of 226 million) Americans signing a petition that helped persuade Congress to pass and Pres. Reagan to sign the law creating this holiday.
This song played a role in that campaign, too. And because it’s Stevie Wonder, you can dance to it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FchMuPQOBwA
I would argue that stereotyping the GOP as quintessentially and irrevocably Southern and then stereotyping the Southern members of the GOP as hicks is part of this same refusal to see the truth about America. In point of fact, most Southern GOP politicians are educated men and women; not a few are from outside the South. And like Southern politicians since the Populist movement over a century ago, they put on a grand act. And their opponents and the media lap it up as fast as a Yankee lawyer in a Southern courtroom. And their supporter support them because they (1) don’t seek to change stuff and (2) especially because they sucker their opposition into losing. That’s been the story of Southern politics for the past forty years. And it continues to exist because no one challenges the charade.
So all over the country and not just in the South we have this pro forma celebration of Dr. King’s birthday in which African-American leaders, the African-American church, the establishment churches of the 1% in a city, a smattering of progressive whites, and a small sample of a diverse public gather somewhere for a religious services, a march, a performance, a parade, a memorial service, or some combination of all these. It is polite, respectful, sometimes joyful and enthusiastic, but it never makes waves.
Dr. King made waves while being just another African-American Baptist preacher.
Dr. King freed the South of its Jim Crow laws. He died trying to free the nation of its institutional dodges that have the same effect as many of those Jim Crow laws. But because those institutional patterns apply to almost every city and town in the US, it isn’t as easy to leverage the general shame and guilt at not living up to one’s stated ideals of freedom and equality–for Dr. King’s tool was demanding real concrete structural repentance and then proclaiming forgiveness and unity. He was not interested in seeing kind words of brotherhood but in changes in laws, habitual practices, institutional norms, and individual attitudes. He was not interested in lip service to his dream.
Too much liberal lip service has resulted in a trend toward a return of Jim Crow laws — and importantly not only in the South. Voter ID laws are just part of the trend. Schools effectively are now segregated all over America’s cities. And “Christian schools” outside the South have extended this practice to many rural and small town areas.
And the progressive movements that allied themselves with Dr. King in the 1960s now want to “move on beyond identity politics to the politics of class”. Forgetting that the fundamental issue is how division and distraction prevent people power from shaking money power. The Montgomery bus boycott, the demonstrations for freedom from Jim Crow laws, and the Poor Peoples March are one movement.
Here is what is not generally recognized. Not a few white Southern clergy participated in the events of the Civil Rights movement – from Texas, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee (those from my personal knowledge). White students in Southern colleges and universities organized a network of support called the Southern Students Organizing Committee and recruited many Southern students for actions during Freedom Summer 1965.
This is recognized. A Detroit housewife volunteered to help voter registration in Mississippi and was martyred there. So also did a white student and a white social worker from New York. Students from elite universities in the northeast and the midwest had their buses firebombed just for intentionally being on those buses with African Americans active in the Civil Rights movement.
It was a time in which fear did not stop people from taking risks. Dr. King and others in the Civil Rights movement allowed that courage to appear.
At the very high point of an the first existential war America was involved in since the American Revolution. A moment when two nuclear-armed powers almost came to war. And then a moment in which a war of choice distracted from the commitment Lyndon Johnson made to Dr. King’s dream.
Dr. King spoke at a rally at the National Mall. And before he was assassinated was planning an occupation of the National Mall.
And the permitting ordinances that Southern cities hastily put into place to keep Dr. King from marching became the national norm. And with the Reagan era of mass homelessness, the variety of ordinances intended to keep the homeless and poor hidden became a national norm. And redlining enforces residential segregation. Unless you are affluent enough. And discrimination in business loans. And square miles of central cities remain in decay or cleared because of discrimination in investments and infrastructure.
It’s time to stop talking about the dream and start occupying the dream. Even though the ghost of a white DC-born bureaucrat still haunts the halls of the building that is named for him. The same guy who was obsessed enough with Dr. King to have copious files on him and invasions of privacy committed to gather information about him. The same guy who did not show up at the funerals either of President Kennedy or of Senator Robert Kennedy because of their actions during the Civil Rights movement. The guy whose spirit haunts every police department in America.
Time again for courage.
Thanks, Tarheel Dem. That’s a sermon Dr. King would have been proud of.
There’s a reason for it. In December 1964, I being a faithful churchgoer, was a student at the Methodist Student Movement assembly in Lincoln, Nebraska. The keynote speakers were biographer Louis Fischer, Rep. John Brademas (D-IN), and Dr. King. His speech was so couched in the religious speech of the South that I did not realize its importance at the time. But it apparently did its work. I had done a lot of thinking about civil rights as the events of the Civil Rights movement unfolded and had approached it from the fundamental freedoms guaranteed in the Constitution and the understanding of government in the Declaration of Independence. My dorm room at Clemson University overlooked John C. Calhoun’s plantation house, but I didn’t buy Calhoun’s view of states rights. In the spring, the White Citizens Councils sent out a mailing recruiting students in Southern colleges and universities and including a paper by a Columbia University psychology professor asserting the intellectual inferiority of Negroes. That paper was presented by the defendants in one of the cases rolled into Brown v. Board of Education in 1964; this was over ten years later. The “science” was ludicrous (and I was a physics major at the time). That was when I didn’t buy all the excuses anymore.
Later, after transferring to a university in Baltimore (and changing my major), in my senior year Dr. King was assassinated and the troops of the 82nd Airborne were sent to Baltimore to restore order after the riots. Seeing a city under martial law is something that one does not easily forget. Ragtop trucks with soldiers standing on the sides, leaning back into the curves of the rag top, M-16s at the ready makes an impression. I decided. Never again.
Which is why in the early 1970s, I was doing community organizing in Atlanta as part of a team seeing if there were ways of stopping white flight from transitional neighborhoods. Essentially, was it possible to have desegregated neighborhoods that lived out Dr. King’s dream. One of the people working in support of this project was a neighborhood Baptist minister, a black assistant minister at a very unusual Southern Baptist church. It was where the staff director for Southern Baptist Convention missions and the editor of the Sunday School curriculum went to church, and the also were supportive of our effort. The assistant minister in fact had previously been the assistant minister at the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama. That church was the one that was bombed during Sunday School on a Sunday morning.
We had conversations about the culture of racism in the South at that time, the events of the civil rights movement, and where courage and faithfulness (call that dependability) came from. And we watched as folks being relocated from outside the South to Atlanta moved to Marietta, Smyrna, Gwinnett County in a rapidly spreading suburban choke ring around the city, even as control of the city passed from from Ivan Allen (a progressive white mayor, “Atlanta is a city too busy to hate.”) to Sam Massell (a progressive Jewish mayor), to Maynard Jackson (the first black mayor of Atlanta). And we felt the dream slipping away even as it seemed to becoming fulfilled.
In 1978, the religious right took over the Southern Baptist Convention. The staff director of Missions and the editor of the Sunday School curriculum were fired. The Southern Baptist church they went to disaffiliated itself from the Southern Baptist Convention. The neighborhood had become a solidly middle-class black neighborhood, whites having moved completely beyond the Atlanta beltway. Despite having middle class demographics, the Rich’s and Davison’s branch store abandoned the nearby mall. White churches, whose ministers had worked very hard to build a desegregated community, soon sold their buildings to black congregations. The APD took longer to respond to 911 calls. And in 1980, a successful candidate for President of the United States put the stamp of legitimacy on bigotry.
I have a huge dog in this hunt.
Would you please start your own blog THD?
Here in Seattle, we not only don’t know our city’s history of racism, but we have who King County is named after, to try to hide it.
From today’s Slog, which got it from HistoryLink
That is the King that King County was named after, before it was renamed King County after MLK.