I think probably the solution here is for women to simply refuse to date, talk to, or engage in sexual activities with Republicans or any Democrat or independent who supports the crap they’re doing in Kansas and all across the country. Either that, or we should slap a $2,000 tax on every box of boner pills.
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
16 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
I read the article and one of the commenters question was whether or not women’s right to own property would be next.
I’m not sure if that would be unconstitutional or not. I mean, on what grounds would it be declared unconstitutional? Commerce?
Any thoughts?
Fifth Amendment.
For what it’s worth — though I’m a guy — I don’t date or have sex with pro-lifers. Three rules really: pro-gay, pro-choice, not overly religious. Usually the three coincide so if you find one, you find all 🙂
Ah, the old Lysistrata ploy. That might not work this time around, now that the party is convinced that only “forcible rape” is real. So they’d presumably feel free to continue their perversions as long as it was done when their “partners” were unconscious, under threat, or being blackmailed.
A more effective and gratifying solution might be more along the lines of Lorena Bobbit or her successors. And think of all the abortions it would prevent.
And here I was trying to avoid ad coating violence…
Damn iPhone spellchecker.
leave that part to me.
I hate these fuckers. If I had my way, those FEMA camps they’re always whining about would be real.
Wait? They’re not real?
That’s sex terrorism!!!!
That’s grounds for divorce in Newt or Rush’s household.
it’s grounds for divorce pretty much everywhere.
Wait…isn’t that what the Republicans want? No sex outside a church-approved opposite-sex marriage? So no Republicans are having sex except under those conditions, right?
What – you mean Republicans do have sex outside those conditions? Why, those hypocrites!
Or they could use the Iranian means of protest:
great picture!!!
I think the solution is to revoke the tax free status of all religious groups. That’ll make em think about something.
…while getting some discussion going about reinstating the Fairness Doctrine. And extending it to cable.
Doesn’t matter if you’re planning on doing it or not, really, just get that knee-jerk ‘knickers in a twist’ reaction, and their tiny little brains will be distracted by some other shiny object.
And also, we could start a fund and an organization to make sure every Democratic voter can get the voter ID he or she will need to vote in the November 2012 election.