Whatever else you might want to say about Bill Clinton’s speech, it broke the spirit of CNN contributor Alex Castellanos. Here is his immediate on-air response to Clinton’s performance:
CASTELLANOS: I would recommend to my friend Paul [Begala] here, tonight when everybody leaves, lock the doors. You don’t have to come back tomorrow. This convention is done. This will be the moment that probably re-elected Barack Obama. Bill Clinton saved the Democratic Party once, it was going too far left, he came in, the New Democrats took it to the center. He did it again tonight.
In case you are unfamiliar with Castellanos’ body of work, he is most famous for creating the most blatantly racist political ad of the last several decades. This was the white hands ad used by Jesse Helms during his 1990 reelection campaign.
Near the end of the 1990 U.S. Senate race in North Carolina, Castellanos produced an advertisement for incumbent Republican Senator Jesse Helms, who was then trailing Democratic challenger and Charlotte mayor Harvey Gantt, an African-American. The ad shows the hands of a white man crumpling a job application rejection notice as a narrator intones, “You needed that job. But they had to give it to a minority.” The ad then references Gantt’s supposed support for racial quotas and Helms’s opposition. No other part of the actor’s body is shown.
Castellanos also made the infamous “Rats” commercial that ran during the 2000 presidential election. He’s a career Republican hatchet man. He also worked for Mitt Romney’s 2008 campaign. It’s not surprising that Castellanos would believe that Romney is finished. But he gets paid a lot of money not to be honest about such things.
Part of Romney’s problem is that his own party’s spokespeople do not believe he will win and therefore have no fear of kneecapping him in public. They know that there will be no opportunity cost.
Spot on, Booman. I too was stunned by Castellanos, not so much for what he said but rather that he said it. He is not one of those few Republicans known for coming right out and admitting the obvious. Unlike David Frum, he’ll stick a sock in it before he’s excommunicated, though I’m sure he’s catching hell from the Romney campaign. I’m equally sure he’s telling them what the guy in the invisible chair said.
By the way, take a gander at Frum’s article predicting the S.Ct. would uphold Obamacare and the GOP would be left to make precisely the case it’s trying to make. Prescient and insightful predictions from one of the few on the right willing to be honest:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/27/after-the-supreme-court-rules.html
Calculated post-speech hyberbole. It was a good speech but it’s not about Clinton, however much washed up right-wing hatchet men may want it to be in their idle reminiscences. It’s about the reality of the difference between Obama and Romney, and what that represents for America, which Clinton so ably demonstrated.
Hyperbole, that’s exactly what I thought when I heard it. I was paying attention to other stuff but I had the CNN commentary running in the background and overheard all that business about Clinton “saving the Democratic Party” from the left wing in the 90s, and then doing it again single-handedly with this speech, and snorted a little bit. I had no idea it was Castellanos talking, had no clue at all until reading this blog post. Quite a twist.
Yeah, something smells bad about this. Trying to plant a meme that a vote for Obama is a vote for some kind of “Clinton shadow government” or something? I agree that Clinton shored up the base and provided great material for convincing waverers, especially conflicted Dems. Sounds to me like Hatchet Man is attempting to push Obama into the background as if he’s someone else’s patsy. Not gonna happen, but worth watching for on the Rep propaganda mills.
Or maybe he’s just trying to instill overconfidence. Which sure as hell won’t work with Obama.
From a hatchet to a dull sword; Tom Foreman and Erin Burnett do a fact check on Clinton’s speech last night I almost missed Alex’s back and forth with Rachel earlier in the summer on MTP.
Romney, GOP Groups Pull Ads From Michigan and Pennsylvania
Castellanos is wrong – like so many Beltway pundits, he’s still operating in an era when TV coverage and political conventions were people’s primary sources for campaign information. It’s not any longer, especially for the small pool of remaining undecideds who mostly don’t care about politics and probably aren’t paying attention yet.
Clinton’s speech was great for political junkies, and it will have an impact, but nowhere near the impact a lot of people (including Castellanos) are attributing to it. Campaigns just don’t work that way any longer. There will be an inevitable barrage of TV ads next month, and if some of Clinton’s refutations can be packaged into TV ads that respond to the barrage, that will have more of an impact than the speech itself.
I think you misunderstand why both M Obama’s and B Clinton’s speeches were in fact very important. Romney from the start has needed both an Obama screwup and to do something extraordinary in a positive sense himself. The convention was Romney’s last chance to do something extraordinary, and he blew it spectacularly.
To be sure, Obama could get up tonight and deliver the worst speech of his career. There is nothing in his history however that suggests anything other than that he delivers when the chips are down. I’ll say that he doesn’t even have to give the best speech of his career, because everything else is already in place.
This convention, much more than the last, seems to be about presenting the Democratic Party as the brand you can trust. Obama doesn’t need to prove himself like he did in 2008. He got bin Laden. Having Clinton nail it as he did last night completely solidifies the narrative that Democrats are the capable ones. The GOP appear in contrast to be screwups.
Romney is someone whose experience taught him that when you need something, you buy it. Obama builds things. I mean this in the most narrow, technical sense. Romney doesn’t have the imagination–why would someone like him need imagination?–to think that there was more to campaigning than buying a staff and showing up. It shows.
Part of Romney’s problem is that his own party’s spokespeople do not believe he will win and therefore have no fear of kneecapping him in public.
I get part of it since Romney has no juice inside the party(everyone hates him), meaning once he loses, his name will never be mentioned again. The part I don’t get is that trashing Willard now might depress turnout enough for down-ballot races that might be close.
Castellanos is painting himself as non-Romney to better market himself for 2014.
These people are NOT politicians. They and their beltway ilk are pundits. They say things that sound profound, intelligent, prescient or commonsensical … and they have never run for sheriff.
Except for brief fantasy’s of total governmental control, these guys forget that downballot exists. Most of them actually believe the crap about Obama’s “vetoproof” senate. Most really believe that the President can FORCE his will on the House and Senate.
They are not politicians.
I’m starting to get the feeling that the Repug PTB have already written off Romney 2012. It feels more like everything they’re doing now is to keep the crazies fired up to salvage what they can down-ballot. And if that means throwing Mittens under the bus, they ain’t gonna shed any tears. Some of them might even enjoy it.
This would imply also that wonder boy Lyin’ Ryan has already flamed out as a national figure in Castellanos’ opinion.
True. I could be honest melancholy at watching their last hope for a bounce deliver nothing.
Or it could be simply trying to set Obama up for tomorrow’s meme that he failed to rally the troops like Clinton did. Given the mood I saw, that just ain’t gonna work either.
Ah…but then reality will set in…
Friday’s job report…
Median income down…
Obama’s just not getting the job done…We gotta let him go…
The middle ten percent that’s going to decide this thing does not give a rat’s ass about Clinton’s speech…
It doesn’t pay their bills…and, more importantly…
It makes Obama look small!!!
Except that it’s looking now like the jobs report will be unexpectedly good.
http://economywatch.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/06/13702703-private-employers-revved-up-hiring-in-augu
st-survey-says?lite
Oh, what? Gee. So sorry to burst your happy little bubble.
I trust the ADP jobs report (which was the good one that just came out today) more than the government report because it’s not a survey, they make their living processing payrolls and you better believe they know precisely how many payroll checks they issue.
Also, good news out of the ECB today. The ECB is going to debase (essentially) the Euro in order to save it. That drives the dollar up. That drove the US stock market up (along with a 6% swing for Volkswagen). So Europe is not going to let the bankers and their austerity destroy their economy after all. And, I think, neither will we.
ECB’S announcement equals more crack for the crack addict!
Only if they stay with the failed austerity model. Otherwise it might equal learning from Iceland, though it’s probably too late to throw the banksters in jail.
I assume you are talking about Wall Street.
You trust a private entity’s opinion over your almighty Government!?
They make their living processing payrolls, governments survive by processing bullshit. I’ve worked for the government for twenty years. I know. Although, at the end when I worked for the Navy it seemed more like I was working for Litton Industries.
ADP sucks.
I, personally, had a hand in taking them down during the Medicaid fiasco in AL.
They just suck with a super bad suckitudde … with 2 d’s.
Ross Perot sucks, also, just with one d