After two days of voting in Nevada, the Democrats have a big lead. But, before you get excited, things are not what they seem. While it’s true that it’s nice to have rolled up a 13,400 vote advantage in just two days, four years ago the Dems rolled up a 16,000 advantage in two days. Four years ago, among registered voters, the Dems had a 60-24 advantage. Right now, they have a 53-31 advantage. On the other hand, the Dems are outperforming the relative registration split by seven points, and that’s after dramatically improving their registration numbers over where they were at the beginning of the year.
In North Carolina, it’s interesting to look at a graph that compares the early voting for blacks and whites in 2008 and so far this year. Overall, the numbers are up among both groups, but the enthusiasm jump among whites disappeared by the weekend. According to Dr. Michael Bitzer on Twitter, Sunday’s early voting was 60% registered Democratic, 20% registered Republican, 19% unaffiliated. For perspective, the Dems had 4,000 more votes yesterday than on the same day in 2008, while the Republicans only had 2,400 more. Unaffiliated voters were up by 2,000 votes.
Here’s a good write-up of how to go about interpreting early results in Florida. There are two ways to vote early in Florida. You can request an absentee ballot or you can go to an early voting center. In 2008, the Republicans had a big lead among people who used the absentee method and Democrats had a bigger lead among those who voted early in person. To address this Democratic advantage, the Republican governor cut down early in-person voting hours dramatically, which led the Democrats to make a major effort to get their voters to use the absentee method this year. In-person voting hasn’t started yet, but we can compare the absentee ballot voting to 2008.
As of yesterday, the Republicans have 5.3% advantage among those who have already returned their absentee ballots. In 2008, the Republicans had a 15% advantage with absentee voters. So, that’s about ten points better the Democrats are doing this year, so far. However, there are two reasons not to get excited. First, every voter the Democrats convinced to vote by absentee this year will not be able to vote again in person. Second, because there are going to be fewer hours to vote in person, the Democrats will bank less votes that way this year than they did four years ago. In 2008, the Democrats had an overall 8.3% advantage in early voting of all types, despite having a 15-point disadvantage with absentees. So, it’s a promising sign that the absentee deficit has been narrowed, but it could be a wash.
Nate Cohn has some hard to decipher thoughts on the early voting in Iowa.
MSM is still talking about diminished energy of Dems compared to ’08. I’m thinking they have missed a subtle change in the party membership. Dem leadership has become less spineless under Obama, they are a different mindset than they were in ’08.
The Dem voters themselves have continued to educate themselves; Occupy energized and spoke to working for our own interests; the reward, I think, has been a Party not less energized but one of more grit.
Early voting results is hopefully telling that Dems aren’t afraid or politely apologetic anymore because they want MORE.
Who cares what the “early vote advantage” is day-by-day? It’s an interesting metric to look at but not anything to lose any sleep over. The first weekend of early voting is chaotic and you wait in lines to do it. After the initial rush passes, you can go in and vote at a leisurely pace with no waiting. Seems like a no-brainer to me. I would have gone and voted on Saturday if it were just me, but I’m bringing my dad at the same time and he won’t do it until Tuesday because he saw the overblown news reports of long waits and anxious people dreaming up conspiracy theories for why they have to wait.
I have received 3 “reminder” calls each day from OFA so far and a pair of door knockers, all communicating the URGENCY of voting extra extra early. When I politely told one of the callers that we’re definitely voting on Tuesday, she sounded like the world was ending and started openly worrying that the election may just be LOST! I reminded her that she is calling Nevada, not Ohio or Florida and suggested she relax. Things are gonna be just fine… Most people here decided weeks ago who they’re voting for, they are motivated to vote and the polls haven’t fluctuated much at all.
In addition to the relatively professional OFA calls, there are also numerous robocalls for everything else like city council and school board.
In the unlikely event that Obama should lose Nevada, and even if he wins it, might I suggest we look at the idea that you can overdo the GOTV effort? Unthinkable, I know.
The 6 months or so of non-stop mind-fucking ads from all of the campaigns are abusive enough. (Especially the Senate race and the SuperPAC ads – Obama’s ads have been okay.) But to then be individually badgered multiple times a day with no way to opt-out is worse. There is a psychological condition I can’t remember the name of that occurs at a certain point. We will all be so glad when this is over that it almost doesn’t matter who wins anymore. Just make it stop.
Well, you know, you can make it stop by voting. On Wednesday, the OFA calls will stop and you can start making them yourself.
I know that.
doesn’t first day early voting feed the narrative of enthusiam…i.e longer line and waiting but still soooo enthusiastic u had to do on day one???
I figure that’s the reason for the push.
DKOS has a post up saying this:
NC Early Voting Day 4: African American Turnout Doubles White GOP Turnout Sunday
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/22/1147893/-NC-Early-Voting-Day-4-African-American-Turnout-Dou
bles-White-GOP-Turnout-Sunday
it’s just one day, but if it holds, is it significant??
Damn!
“Latino voters highly engaged in presidential election, support for Obama rises | Latino Decisions”
http://www.latinodecisions.com/blog/2012/10/22/latino-voters-highly-engaged-in-presidential-election
-support-for-obama-rises/ #LatinoDecisions
Obama upwards of 70% support among Latinos. How much of that support would be needed to effect results???
There’s a sense of pride in being a minority, whether it’s black, Latino/a, etc or a woman that your vote can not just turn the election but turn it into a barn burner for Obama and Dems. Talk about empowerment!
“NBC/WSJ poll: Obama leads by 45 points with Likely Latino voters”
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/22/14617456-nbcwsj-poll-obama-leads-by-45-points-with-lat
inos?lite