David ‘Honey BoBo’ Brooks made the following observations during his appearance on Meet the Press yesterday.
MR. DAVID BROOKS (Columnist, New York Times): Yeah. Well, first, let’s say what’s happening in Washington right now is pathetic. When you think about what the revolutionary generation did, what the Civil War generation did, what the World War II generation did, we’re asking not to bankrupt our children and we’ve got a shambolic, dysfunctional process. Now I think most of the blame still has to go to the Republicans. They’ve had a brain freeze since the election. They have no strategy. They don’t know what they want. And they haven’t decided what they want. But if I had to fault President Obama, I would say that sometimes he’s– governs like a– a visitor from a morally superior civilization. He comes in here and he will not– he– he’ll talk with Boehner, he won’t talk with the other Republicans. He hasn’t built the trust. Boehner actually made a pretty serious concession, 800 billion dollars in tax revenues, probably willing to go up on rates. But the trust wasn’t there to get that done. And if the president wants to get stuff done over the next four years, it’s got to be a lot more than making the intellectual concessions. It’s got– got to get to the place where Republicans say, okay, we’ll take a risk. This guy won’t screw us.
So, Mr. Brooks criticizes the president for negotiating the fiscal cliff with John Boehner but not with other Republicans. Yet, David Brooks’ employer reported in early December that John Boehner had directly requested that others be excluded from the negotiations. Here’s New York Times’ reporters Jonathan Weisman and Peter Baker from December 6th:
At House Speaker John A. Boehner’s request, Senate leaders and Representative Nancy Pelosi have been excluded from talks to avert a fiscal crisis, leaving it to Mr. Boehner and President Obama alone to find a deal, Congressional aides say.
All sides, even the parties excluded, say clearing the negotiating room improves the chance of success. It adds complexity as the two negotiators consult separately with the leaders not in the room. But it also minimizes the number of people who need to say yes to an initial agreement.
Maybe Mr. Brooks thinks that the president should be negotiating informally on the telephone with Republican backbenchers. He could invite them to the White House for egg nog, snowball fights, and other “trust-building” exercises. And then Mr. Brooks says that the president acts like he comes from some morally-superior planet. How is that really different from calling him an uppity arrogant Kenyan?
I also love how he says he lays most of the blame on the Republicans but it’s the president who gets called an alien.
John Boehner made a serious concession?
First of all, he didn’t. Second of all, because no one else was in the room to sign off on Boehner’s “concession,” it didn’t wind up being a concession at all. Because Boehner wouldn’t let the other Republicans in on the negotiations, he didn’t build the trust he needed to sell his caucus a deal. It wasn’t the president’s fault; it was Boehner’s.
Happy New Year, BoBo. I hope you enjoy your sinecures.
Is this the last day that Joe walsh is my Congressman?
I hope it’s yes so that I really have something to celebrate at Midnight.
you have to suffer until the 3rd.
Ah Thursday. I have to see the Oral Surgeon, but it’s worth it.
Having had several root canals, I suspect that one of those would be much less painful than even a month of representation by Walsh. Our critter isn’t much better, but at least he rarely opens his mouth on the national stage.
OT, but I read the article from Jonathan chait & what he’s said was that the WH thinks it’s the Senate Dems who would cut them at the knees to save themselves & make a deal that undercuts the WH. So the deal people are “sourcing” today seems to be one that will get support of ConservaDems. certain groups always complain that the admin doesn’t have dem party back but rarely admit that on occasion the dems undercut the Prez. So what can the WH do that causes least damage to regular folk & still satisfy the usual suspects.
Isn’t Biden doing the negotiating with McConnell? I hardly think he would undercut the White House.
yes, but wasn’t that after McConnell asked for it? and Aldo the $400K number came after Biden joined. Why? because the ConservaDems were balking
“on occasion”? Obama has always had to temper his language and his positions to keep the conservaDems from running to the microphones to complain.
Yet they all come together and give the MIC more power. Why is that?
No doubt that after reading this highly valued advice, White House staff is burning up the phone lines building trust with Repubican congressfolk.
The only enjoyable moment in that awful panel was when Gregory asked Brooks what “shambolic” meant and he had to admit that he didn’t know.
really? that’s so funny – he published a column with a word in it he couldn’t define? pathetic indeed. and also, speaking of the sacrifice of other generations I haven’t heard of him writing about what he’s going to sacrifice
MR. BROOKS: So, I think the problem is centrally in the country, and the politicians look like idiots because they are responding to horrible incentives.
GREGORY: And it interesting…
MS. GOODWIN: And it’s shambolic. That’s a great word.
GREGORY: Yeah. What does shambolic mean exactly?
MR. BROOKS: It some British…
GREGORY: Okay…well, you know, I thought I’d let it go the first time. On second thought I had to say I don’t really know what you meant.
I would have thought it was a portmanteau word, a combination of “sham” and “symbolic” — quite a useful word for so much of what happens in Washington, eh? — but no, Google says this:
https://www.google.com/search?q=shambolic
never would have guessed, to me it sounds peaceful and pleasant like lambs gamboling in a pasture in Shambala
Truly ironic, that, since a shambles is a slaughterhouse. I daresay your lambs wouldn’t be gamboling for long.
wow! I didn’t realize that. shambles is slaughterhouse? poor lambs, I won’t wish it on them
It’s got– got to get to the place where Republicans say, okay, we’ll take a risk. This guy won’t screw us.
HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
Republicans screwed themselves and I can’t see a teabagger saying this.
Wanker of the year nominee.
Brooks is the walking embodiment of the toxic filth known as conventional Washington wisdom. So much of what he says and writes is essentially dishonest, either intentionally or because he has his head firmly inserted up his rectum. The guy is committed to this garbage, which leaves me committed to never reading his column and thinking of him as rarely as possible.
The idea that any of Boner’s Boneheads would go along with empirically based policies that would solve actual problems if only they “trusted” the Kenyan Usurper is somewhere between comic and delusional. Yes, indeed, all that’s needed is more Repub boneheads invited to Obama pick-up basketball games, you betcha!
The wanker gets paid good money for this worthless made-up shit. With a perch on PBS to boot. A real meritocracy we live in…
Yes, it’s the little touches that distinguish a truly great wanker. It’s easy enough to blame Obama for the Republicans’ intransigence, but it takes a special talent to cite “what the Civil War generation did” as some kind of precedent for what ought to happen in Washington now. The more I think about that, the more impressed I am.
I thought Gregory was just as wankerific. He asked Obama why he failed to get the GOP to work with him, knowing full well they plotted before he even took office to oppose everything. God, I hate these people.