That the Republican Party is demonstrating fractured views on foreign policy is only one small part of a much greater state of generalized disarray. The most obvious problem is that they have no leader. Not only is there no prospect of past leaders like Dick Cheney, John McCain, Sarah Palin, or Mitt Romney making some kind of comeback, there is no one like Ronald Reagan or Poppy Bush waiting in the wings to take the reins of the party and lead it in a new direction.
Of course, we can find people who might plausibly pick up the banner, step into the breach, and rally the troops (and someone can always come from nowhere), but it is becoming increasingly hard to see much promise in the usual suspects. Chris Christie always had the problem that he is morbidly obese, but he’s discovered that the secret to immense popularity is not to compete to make the most unhinged comment about the president but to wrap his arms around him and thank him for coming to his state’s aid. Bashing the Republicans in Congress doesn’t hurt, either, but it doesn’t carve out much of a future in any prospective primary season.
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has decided that he will win over the conservative rank-and-file by calling them stupid. Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell lost his chance to be on Romney’s ticket when he allowed his party to become associated with compulsory trans-vaginal ultrasounds. The Republican governors of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Florida are proving to be immensely unpopular, which helped Obama carry all five states comfortably.
There might be a future with Latino leaders like Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, and Governors Susana Martinez of New Mexico and Brian Sandoval of Nevada, but we’re about to go through a contentious debate about immigration reform, and it’s quite likely that the Republican base will emerge with sore feelings about anyone who advocated moderation and reform, regardless of the outcome.
Inasmuch as the Congressional Republicans have leaders, they aren’t popular. John Boehner is a serious alcoholic who is widely seen as the weakest and most incompetent Speaker of the House in living memory. He actually cannot be considered a leader at all, since he can’t make his caucus do anything. The Senate Minority Leader is an effective tactician, but he is up for reelection and fewer than twenty percent of Mitch McConnell’s constituents are enthused about his reelection.
Obviously, someone will become the Republican Party’s nominee in 2016, but it doesn’t seem likely that they will be anymore influential among the party faithful than Mitt Romney.
People talk a lot about how demographic changes are shrinking the Republicans’ natural share of the electorate, and that is true. But the party has been going beyond this disability by alienating groups who were previously at least willing to give them a hearing. The turn against climate science and the increasing hostility toward educators of all types has led rapidly to situation where only six percent of scientists consider themselves Republicans. The conservatives have always had a disadvantage with creative, artistic people, but losing, in addition, almost 19 out of 20 empirical minds is a recipe for disaster. Waging a war against women’s rights in Congress and (especially) in the states, while making it painfully clear that they don’t like Latinos and don’t want blacks to vote, has taken a liability and turned it into an albatross.
Republican ideas already suffer from a non-factual non-evidence based bias, but there are increasing signs that the consensus on important issues is becoming strained. This is true on foreign policy and it is true on economics. There isn’t much in common between John McCain and Rand Paul on foreign policy, and you could say the same about economics between Rand Paul and Eric Cantor.
The result is that the GOP appears rudderless. There are certainly fractures within Obama’s coalition, but it is big enough to digest them. In fact, the extremism of the modern GOP serves an important role in creating cohesion on the left. We might be highly concerned about many Obama administration policies, but we have nowhere to go and we’re happy about so much of what they’re doing that we’re not willing to risk blowing up the center-left coalition in a fit of pique.
The Republicans appear to be in the wilderness without a map. The few things that are working to unite them (like anti-tax absolutism) are actually going to alienate their big money donors and further weaken them. The right is screwed.
And now you have Ken “Cuckoo” Cuccinelli saying that Scalia is a pansy-ass liberal. Seriously!!
wow! what’s that about?
Check it out for yourself:
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/01/31/1520841/tea-party-attorney-general-ken-cuccinelli-scalia
-is-too-liberal/
That’s our Cooch! Transvaginal probes, covering up breasts of Virtus on the state flag/seal, investigating UVA and Michael Mann, trying hard to keep minorities from voting (purging our roles), and now Scalia is a pansy ass sell-out.
Hands Off, Crazy:
Ew. Rolls*
transvaginal probes – correct terminology is state sponsored rape
oh my, what to say to this, trying to attact teatards is he?
I frankly don’t know why he said it. Maybe he’s just dumb. He really has no need to attract anymore of them; and as the days/weeks/months/years go by VA is becoming more blue, so he has a need for less crazy people.
Cooch is unlikely to serve the role of Moses here.
Very interesting. makes one wonder if there isn’t an 11 dimensional chess factor in bringing up immigration reform now (same goes for Hagelian dialectical nominee)
40 years walking around the
SinaiMojave insandalsboots, sans strings, would be appropriate…An apt analogy. A more recent analogy is the 40 years the Democratic Party spent “in the wilderness” from 1968 (when the New Deal coalition fractured over civil rights and the Vietnam War) to 2008.
Saw Chris Hayes on the RMS show tonight and this very issue of the GOP going off the rails does present problems in governance for the country, serious problems. Specifically, the ability to get 66 votes in the U.S. Senate to sign on to a climate treaty whereby every signing country agrees to cut emissions by whatever factor. All these countries understand our politics enough to know that that’s going nowhere with the current GOP.
So, us good government types, need to join up with that liberal Pac aiming to take the House back in 2014, as impossible as that may seem. In order to get anything done, the GOP has to change and the chances of that, without a viable leader on the horizon, are virtually nil.
One only has to revisit the Hagel hearing and get a load of the grandstanding by say, Lindsay Graham. He’s acting crazy cause he’s having to run for reelection. There are, of course, further examples to show thatthose in Congress are still running scared of the base in their party and those elected and serving in GOP controlled state legislatures are are already in lockstep with that base. Rachel’s been documenting this all week.
I think you discount the Republicans at your peril. I’d lay money, today at least, on the nominee being Marco Rubio. They’ll readily forgive him for being Hispanic and supporting immigration reform, and he’ll siphon off a pretty big percentage of Latino votes, especially since there’s little likelihood the Dems will have a Hispanic on the ticket.
I’ve seen Rubio on a talk show or two and he’s pretty slick. Far better than Romney, who was the best of the bunch in 2012.
Let’s hope the rest of the 2016 slate drag him to the right and that the contest drags out until May. Maybe we should start funding Allen West…
Hispanics do not like Rubio. He represents the racism of the GOP. Cubans do not have to possess a special skill, education, or speak english….they only need wet feet to enter the country legally.
His heritage is also Cuban. Within the Hispanic community a distinction is made between Cubans and Puerto Ricans and between them and Mexicans and between Mexicans and others from Latin Americans.
They effectively don’t even speak the same language.
I am not sure Rubio will peel off that many Democratic voters outside of Florida.
Your speaking to someone who worked damn hard to get Hispanics to vote for a blond candidate with an anglo name. Ended up getting in the 20 %s in those precincts during the primary. Their vote went to the Hispanic candidate who had screwed them over a few times.
He won’t siphon off all the Hispanic gains we’ve made, but it will be quite a few. Who knows if it will be enough if we have a popular Dem, and if the economy is good? Otherwise…
“You’re”.
I haven’t finished my morning cuppa tea yet.
The GOP are stuck in their make believe alternate universe. They actually believe their is a Superman that’ll save them from their self imposed exile of sound reasoning in THIS era. I guess its ok to wait for Superman but they’ve got to rid themselves of the many clones of Bizzarro Supermen teeming in the sheltered dome of Congressional Building. Only way to do that is to wait for the real Superman to come along to defeat the Bizzarro Supermen. He’s the only one that can defeat Bizzarro! Its going to be a while. Superman only exist in comic books.
And yet they have massive veto power at every level of government, partly through Democratic complicity.
A very rational and objective take on our noble Repubs. They are now a Hitler party without a Hitler. They are however, doing quite well in taking over and ruining state gub’mints, but perhaps that trend, too, will change.
I suppose one could name KKKarl Rover and Boss Rushbo (or some of the other hidden corporate bagmen) as the real “leaders” of the party, but even Repubs seem to find those two worthies in bad odor after their latest failures and atrocities. There has never been much of an attempt to publicize the actual plutocrats behind the “conservative” curtain, although recently attention has been focused on some of these horrible monsters, turds like the Koch Boyz, for example. But the secret moneymen certainly are not the public leaders or “face” of our cornpone fascists.
As others have noted, this means the Repubs’ sole route to power is to ensure that the federal gub’mint is completely paralyzed and unable to take any action, resolve any pressing national problem, or begin to reform any of our manifest national decay and corruption. That is their only possible strategy as an ideological party with no real leader.
So that is what Repubs are doing and what they will continue to do. Wait until the next financial and economic collapse, which our Wall Street Wizardz will most certainly engineer in due course. Certainly the hopelessly understaffed and undermanned financial oversight agencies aren’t in a position to do too much to stop Goldman Sachs.
But “conservatives” do need to start finding and grooming their New Model Fuhrer now, so he is ready to start foaming at the mouth against Big Gub’mint the next time Wall Street sends us all into the toilet. Perhaps some of the Repub hopefuls should take some pointers from the many newsreels of old Adolph, with all the mystical eye rolling and overwrought pained emotion about the beloved Fatherland and its destiny. Lebensraum! Look to the master for instruction. Can’t hurt. Especially with the “conservative” base, ha-ha.
Now that’s a scary thought. That’s about all it would take: a charismatic neo-nazi or white supremacist with a great big PAC-funded megaphone. I can imagine the Oath Keeper types crawling out of the woodwork, locked and loaded, if the right kind of voice got hold of the right microphone.
I was just reading about the origins of the Republican part in a biography of Lincoln. It’s fascinating to see how far both parties have come from where they were then. I totally would have been a Republican in 1860. This account doesn’t give the big picture, since it’s focused on Lincoln’s activities in Illinois, but it seems pretty clear that the primary motive for the formation of the Republican party was to oppose the extension of slavery.
That’s what the Lincoln-Douglas debates were all about in 1858, with Douglas repeatedly insisting that the phrase “all men are created equal” was not meant to include blacks. So the Democrats were the racist asshole party at that point. And yet now you’ve got southern Republican insisting that the Civil War had nothing to do with slavery.
The existence of a racist asshole constituency does appear to be pretty constant, though. For all the changes and reversals, I’ve been trying to figure out what continuities there are in the parties’ histories. And it seems like the Democrats always have been the party of the people, of the majority, but with a huge fat asterisk that “the people” were initially understood to mean only white men. So they were liberal in working to extend the franchise to all white men, but the portcullis came crashing down as soon as you tried to talk about non-whites or women.
But that same logic of wanting to extend voting rights can be decoupled from the racist assholism, which could account for the migration of the racist assholes to the Republican party. If your basic strategy is to win elections by expanding the base of voters, and you aren’t a racist asshole, then your coalition is naturally going to include women and minorities.