Ed Markey is running to serve the remainder of John Kerry’s term in the Senate. He’s known as a champion on environmental issues. He arrived in the House of Representatives in 1976, and he obviously has a ton of seniority there. In the Senate, he will be at the bottom of the heap. It’s not even likely that he will be able to land a seat on a committee that has much to do with the environment, at least in the short term. So, The Hill asks whether he will have more or less clout in the Senate majority than he currently has in the House minority. Their answer is that he will have less clout in the short run, but more clout in the long run. That seems about right to me, although I wonder if Democratic members of the House can be said to have any clout at all.
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
2 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
How can he have much clout without seniority which I don’t see him having. That is unless a ton f people retire or lose. Could happen I guess. And it depends where that clout is: if he sticks to the environment or health he’s fine. Tell him to stay away from foreign affairs; no excuse for his Iraq war vote.
It really depends on who runs the Senate after 2014, and if that limp useless POS Reid decides to nuke the Repukes.