On Booman’s recent post Casual Observation…a look at the currently raging, totally media-created pro-/anti Glen Greenwald hottest-thing-ever brouhaha…Booman poster paul manning wrote the following sentence:
…I’m at loss why they needed to use terror law to detain someone suspected of transporting state secrets.
I started a reply and it grew. Here it is.
Why? Because “state secrets” of this kind and scope are themselves instruments of terror, paul. The entire legal system is now based on “terror,” and the aims of the originally labelled terrorists…bin Laden, et al…have finally been met. The aim of the terrorist war…a guerrilla war fought by more contemporary means, really…was to destabilize the U.S. Why? Because they believed that U.S. economic imperialist depredations had truly harmed their own countries. They have totally succeeded in that aim. The U.S. is now approaching being as “terroristic” domestically as it has been internationally at least since Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. It has always held portions of its population captive under threat of terror…minorities of color, mostly, as a convenient way to maintain an extraordinarily cheap labor forces…but now the message is beginning to leak out to the heretofore relatively unterrorized white working and middle classes.
Fuck with our scam and we will mess you up, too!!!
The disastrous bursting of the economic bubble added to the natural terror felt by the populace after 9/11. Now? The outing of the security state is putting the finishing touches on the American myth, “The land of the free and the home of the brave?” Not anymore. “The land of the hustled and the home of the paranoid” is where we are headed now. Bet on it. And all of this is a result of the actions of a group of people who by and large are still living several centuries in the past, people who if we had not been so goddamned greedy would probably be fairly peacefully still trying to enter the 20th and 21st centuries. People many of whom are ruled by fundamentalists that make our little gospel quoters look like apprentice altar boys.
Word.
More?
Sure.
Read on.
I know Saudi Arabia (see below) is supposed to be our “ally,”…and it will surely remain in that position as long as continues to be fabulously profitable to do so…but the Sharia law in common practice in Saudi Arabia and also throughout much of the rest of the Islamic world is at least as uncivilized as were our genocidal/lynching/witch-hunting ancestors in the U.S..
Case in point?
Sure.
Saudi Arabia’s War on Witchcraft
By Ryan JacobsThe sorceress was naked.
The sight of her bare flesh startled the prudish officers of Saudi Arabia’s infamous religious police, the Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (CPVPV), which had barged into her room in what was supposed to be a routine raid of a magical hideout in the western desert city of Madinah’s Al-Seeh neighborhood. They paused in shock, and to let her dress.
The woman — still unclothed — managed to slip out of the window of her apartment and flee. According to the 2006 account of the Saudi Okaz newspaper, which has been described as the Arabic equivalent of the New York Post, she “flew like a bird.” A frantic pursuit ensued. The unit found their suspect after she had fallen through the unsturdy roof of an adjacent house and onto the ground next to a bed of dozing children.
They covered her body, arrested her, and claimed to uncover key evidence indicating that witchcraft had indeed been practiced, including incense, talismans, and videos about magic. In the Al Arabiya report, a senior Islamic cleric lamented that the incident had occurred in a city of such sacred history. The prophet Muhammad is buried there, and it is considered the second most holy location in Islam, second to Mecca. The cleric didn’t doubt the details of the incident. “Some magicians may ride a broom and fly in the air with the help of the jinn [supernatural beings],” he said.
The fate of this sorceress is not readily apparent, but her plight is common. Judging from the punishments of others accused of practicing witchcraft in Saudi Arabia before and since, the consequences were almost certainly severe.
In 2007, Egyptian pharmacist Mustafa Ibrahim was beheaded in Riyadh after his conviction on charges of “practicing magic and sorcery as well as adultery and desecration of the Holy Quran.” The charges of “magic and sorcery” are not euphemisms for some other kind of egregious crime he committed; they alone were enough to qualify him for a death sentence. He first came to the attention of the religious authorities when members of a mosque in the northern town of Arar voiced concerns over the placement of the holy book in the restroom. After being accused of disrupting a man’s marriage through spellwork, and the discovery of “books on black magic, a candle with an incantation ‘to summon devils,’ and ‘foul-smelling herbs,'” the case — and eventually his life — were swallowed by the black hole of the discretionary Saudi court system.
The campaign of persecution has shown no signs of fizzling. In May, two Asian maids were sentenced to 1,000 lashings and 10 years in prison after their bosses claimed that they had suffered from their magic. Just a few weeks ago, Saudi newspapers began running the image of an Indonesian maid being pursued on accusations that she produced a spell that made her male boss’s family subject to fainting and epileptic fits. “I swear that we do not want to hurt her but to stop her evil acts against us and others,” the man told the news site Emirates 24/7.
According to Adam Coogle, a Jordan-based Middle East researcher for Human Rights Watch who monitors Saudi Arabia, the relentless witch hunts reveal the hollowness of the country’s long-standing promises about liberalizing its justice system.
In a country where public observance of any religion besides Islam is strictly forbidden, foreign domestic workers who bring unfamiliar traditional religious or folk customs from Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Africa, or elsewhere can make especially vulnerable and easy targets. “If they see these [folk practices or items] they immediately assume they’re some kind of sorcery or witchcraft,” he said.
The Saudi government’s obsession with the criminalization of the dark arts reached a new level in 2009, when it created and formalized a special “Anti-Witchcraft Unit” to educate the public about the evils of sorcery, investigate alleged witches, neutralize their cursed paraphernalia, and disarm their spells. Saudi citizens are also urged to use a hotline on the CPVPV website to report any magical misdeeds to local officials, according to the Jerusalem Post.
According to a director of the religious police’s witchcraft division in Riyadh, the unit provides confidentiality to informants. “We deal with sorcerers in a special way. No one should think that we mention the name of whomever files a report about sorcery,” Sheikh Adel Faqih told the Saudi Gazette. In 2009 alone, at least 118 people were charged with “practicing magic” or “using the book of Allah in a derogatory manner” in the province of Makkah, the country’s most populous region.
Faqih also claimed that the process of arresting someone for crimes of magic involved more than just receiving a tip from a neighbor or employer. A formal investigation would be pursued, and “information must be collected before an arrest can be made.” What sort of information do they need? The answer was unsurprisingly vague and innocuous: if the suspect sought to purchase “an animal with certain features.” For example, “he asks for a sheep to be killed without mentioning Allah’s name and asks to stain the body with the animal’s blood or if he asks for similar unusual things.”
By 2011, the unit had created a total of nine witchcraft-fighting bureaus in cities across the country, according to Arab News, and had “achieved remarkable success” in processing 586 cases of magical crime, the majority of which were foreign domestic workers from Africa and Indonesia. Then, last year, the government announced that it was expanding its battle against magic further, scapegoating witches as the source of both religious and social instability in the country. The move would mean new training courses for its agents, a more powerful infrastructural backbone capable of passing intelligence across provinces, and more raids. The force booked 215 sorcerers in 2012.
—snip—
Wresting the country’s criminal proceedings from the grip of one of the strictest strains of Islam would involve more than just the development of a more progressive outlook; it would require cosmic revisions in Saudi history and religious identity.
The Saudi government and many of its citizens subscribe to the 18th-century teachings of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, a revivalist Islamic scholar who called for a return to literal interpretations of the Quran, and for the abandonment of folk rituals that had developed around the worship of Islamic shrines and grave sites. According to historian Vladmir Borisovich Lutsky:
He sharply criticised such superstitious survivals as fetishism and totemism, which, to him, were indistinguishable from idolatry. Formally all the Arabs were Moslems. But, in reality, there existed many local tribal religions in Arabia. Each Arab tribe, each village had its fetish, its beliefs and rites. The variety of religious forms that stemmed from the primitive level of social development and the lack of cohesion between the countries of Arabia were serious obstacles to political unity. Abd el-Wahhab set up against this religious polymorphism a single doctrine called tauhid (unity)…
….The Wahhabis fought against the survivals of local tribal cults. They destroyed the tombs of the saints, and forbade magic fortune-telling. But at the same time their teachings were directed against official Islam.
Under Wahhabi doctrine, magic is seen as a serious affront to the pure and exclusive relationship one is supposed to share with Allah.
But belief in the supernatural and magic is actually quite common in Muslim culture. According to the Quran, the jinn are demonic supernatural beings that were created out of fire at the same time as man. Some believe that jinn have the power to cause harm, and it is not uncommon for the possessed to visit faith healers or sorcerers tasked with ridding the evil.
According to the Pew Research Center’s Religion and Public Life Project:
In most of the countries surveyed, roughly half or more Muslims affirm that jinn exist and that the evil eye is real. Belief in sorcery is somewhat less common: half or more Muslims in nine of the countries included in the study say they believe in witchcraft.
Accusations of jinn worship and witchcraft once even touched the administration of former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, when his advisers and aides were arrested on charges of black magic. Ahmadinejad denied the charges, but a sorcerer well-known among the ruling class claimed that he met with the President at least twice and gathered intelligence for him on “Jinn who work for Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad, and for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency,” according to the Wall Street Journal.
According to the Pew survey, the majority of Muslims agree that Islam restricts making contact with jinn or using magic. But Wahhabism is particularly opposed to this notion, according to Muhammad Husayn Ibrahimi’s analysis of the sect:
—snip—
The courts are controlled by judges — commonly religious clerics — who have unlimited latitude to interpret and define the content of witchcraft crime, the details of which are not articulated in a spare, barely existent penal code. They can also mete out capital punishments as they see fit. Saudi Arabia ranks third behind China and Iran for its number of executions. Evidence in these cases is limited to witness testimony and the presentation of the “magical” items discovered in the possession of the accused.
—snip—
Domestic workers, many of whom who are not fluent in Arabic, face significant challenges in defending themselves against these [kinds of] charges, according to Coogle. Sometimes, he says, “they don’t even know what’s happening.” “I think that there are cases where the authorities will provide translation, but I’m told the translation isn’t always available and isn’t always reliable.” Many don’t have the resources to hire a lawyer, so they are often representing themselves, unless a human rights organization takes on their case.
Even then, they must face a religious cleric who serves simultaneously as a judge and a prosecutor and can often introduce new charges or modify existing ones during the course of the proceedings. “When you have a situation that’s so arbitrary and left to the discretion of a judge, women without the means to defend themselves can sort of be left alone,” he said. Though some of the cases receive international attention, Coogle expects that many don’t make headlines at all. “Given the isolation of these individuals,” he said, “I just expect that a lot happens that we don’t know about.”
Of course, much of this seems to be a fairly primitive precursor of the U.S. injustice system…witness the demonization of Assange, Manning and Snowden, the kangaroo court proceedings/Guantanamo-Abu Ghraib-so-called “extraordinary rendition” practices that our own lovely government brought against Manning and other so-called terrorists plus the ongoing almost totally racially defined stop-and-frisk routines of our own police forces.
He looked like he
might be a witchmight be a terroristmight be carrying, so we frisked him. He wuz. He wuz carrying a couple of joints, so we arrested him. What happened after that? I dunno. Too busy on the street. I got a quota, y’know…
“OFF WITH (
HIS) (THEIR) HER HEAD(S)!!!”, CRIED THE QUEEN(S)
The prophet Lewis Carroll knew. Nothing really changes…things just morph into new, more “modern” forms.
So it goes.
So it goes as we clomp-clomp-clomp on into the past tense future.
Station WTFU once again…sigh…signing off.
Wake The Fuck Up.
Later…
AG
That Atlantic article is written in classic boilerplate tabloid style.
Etcetera.
A lede from the Sunday Daily News back pages crime articles circa 1961 or even earlier, transposed to Saudi Arabia.
But…the content of the article is pretty much on the money. Over much of the Islamic world huge portions of the population are living in a state of belief that is easily 200-300 years behind that of the rest of the world.
And…they are winning.
Proof?
Here it is:
Oh yeah?
Where’s the body?
Oh.
They buried it at sea?
Nice.
Convenient.
Magical thinking at its modern best.
More?
Sure.
What.
You don’t remember how we got into Iraq in the first place?
Oh..
Nevermind.
Go vote for whichever What’s his (or her) name suits your media-led fancy and Lee Harvey Oswald really was the lone gunman.
Whatever.
WTFU.
Later…
AG
I hate to admit it but I agree with that. Our wars on terror and drugs have justified the use domestic surveillance to prosecute environmental and social activism and copyright infringement and to justify new paradigms like ‘civil forfeiture’ as an extra-constitutional assertion of municipal and federal warlordism.
It will soon be an unspoken but well understood reality for most Americans that their recently militarised local law enforcement entities protect a new status quo on behalf of the 1% and that anything which threatens this is ‘terrorism.’ I fear this ship has already sailed; it would take an unlikely bipartisan effort to unwind the national security state we have already built and given the immense taxpayer investment it might just hobble our economy to do so.
Well, Shaun…maybe I’m right about a lot of things. What you are “agreeing” with is the fundamental basis of almost everything that I have been saying on the web for almost ten years now.
We been tarbabied, brother.
You know that Brer Rabbit story? “The Wonderful Tar-Baby Story?” It’s based on the real deal, based on southern black folk stories as they were told during slavery times, and the whole “Uncle Remus” series has gotten bad rap. Joel Chandler Harris…much like Mark Twain with his character Jim in “Huckleberry Finn”…was trying to illuminate and preserve a valuable, survivalist working culture in writing.
Brer Fox wants to catch Brer Rabbit but he never seems to be able to succeed. Finally he makes a mannequin out of tar and turpentine and sets it up on a road frequently traveled by Brer Rabbit. Brer Rabbit passes by and tries to make small talk w/the mannequin, but “Tar-Baby ain’t sayin’ nuthin’.” Eventually Brer Rabbit gets so offended that punches the Tar-Baby and his fist gets stuck. He then gets even madder and punches it with his other fist. That gets stuck too. Now madder’n hell, Brer Rabbit gets both feet stuck too and finally tries butting the Tar-Baby with his head. Only after he is totally stuck does Brer Fox reveal himself.
We need a Judge B’ar to come along and loose us, Shaun, before we become fodder for the foxes who have trapped us in our own tarpit of hubris. We are already three limbs in if not more. It ain’t gonna be a mainstream DemRat, that’s for sure, and unless the RatPubs experience a total revolution in only a few years…not a likely scenario by a long shot…we are going to need a “B’ar” Party of some sort to kick the elephants and donkeys out of the way so’s we can break free of this massive mistake that we have made.
Will it happen?
I am afraid that I would have to lay long odds against it happening. But long odds do not preclude strange possibilities. If in the summer of 2001 I had asked you to bet the farm on the possibility of a black president winning the White House in 2004, what would you have said? Besides “Get lost,” of course.
Riiiiight…
Just sayin’.
In the best of all possible worlds we would resign our commission as the Nato-allied nation’s chief cop and start tending to our own pressing business at home. Thus I support anyone who promises to try to do so.
If it doesn’t happen?
Sue me.
You can’t get blood from a stone, and I am a stone rock in these matters.
That you can bet on.
As you said:
I am glad that you are still at least somewhat open to common reason. I only hope that there are others like you. Many others.
The dawn of truth regarding pressing matters is often a painful experience.
Deal wid it.
You be bettah off.
Bet on that as well.
Later…
AG
Of course, my disnumeric nature just bit me in the ass again.
I should have written:
“If in the summer of 2005 I had asked you to bet the farm on the possibility of a black president winning the White House in 2008, what would you have said? Besides ‘Get lost,’ of course.”
Numbers and I have never been close friends.
So it goes.
Later…
AG
That we have been mostly willing participants in this transition; in exchange for a few consumer baubles we have traded away the accumulated social wealth of generations. When I think of those who sacrificed themselves throughout our history to establish and preserve the principles we have relinquished for the sake of a McMansion and a few decades of junk food I could cry real tears.
I can think of a number of reasons why this is so and a number of things which might be done to remedy the situation but none of them seems very likely.
What is absolutely galling is that those whom are perpetrating these consequences on an unsuspecting public are acting not only from shallow and venal motives but are not even that bright. The middle-class are being gradually herded into social extinction by contemptuous mediocrities.
We’ve been bearing witness to a three-decade process of undoing what modest economic and social progress the previous generations had spilled real sweat and blood to achieve. It has been indeed a discouraging spectacle. It may take a few decades, but there will be a reckoning for all the damage we’ve allowed to be done.
An echo of 1626 — when Minuit purchased Manhattan.
Hopefully we will not spend the next few centuries colonised by the oligarchs but I suppose it could happen.
No need. The only big chunks of land and resources that they don’t have and want are held by local, state, and the federal government. Force them into bankruptcy and the best bits will come up for sale. We’ll be free to share whatever is leftover.