I’ve already written about the fact that the Founding Fathers were not in favor of the filibuster, so maybe Judd Gregg can just go read that. What’s more amazing than former Senator Judd Gregg’s interpretation of history is his assignment of blame for Senate dysfunction. He blames it on Harry Reid’s decision to “fill the tree.”
If you don’t know what that means, go here.
It was healthy for a nation with the size and complexity of ours to be assured that at one place in the process of governance, either a lone voice could make a point he or she deemed important, or an entire party representing the minority in the nation could make such a point.
This all ended recently when the Democratic membership of the Senate decided to exercise the single worst abuse of power in more than two hundred years of our constitutional democracy by changing the rules of the Senate so that 51 members of the Senate can now control the body in a unilateral and dictatorial manner.
The process had been building over the last few years. The Democratic Party’s leadership in the Senate had exploded the use of a procedure known as “filling the tree,” which, as a practical matter, cut off the historic rights of individual senators to offer whatever amendment they deemed appropriate to bills brought to the floor of the Senate and ended the power of the minority to offer amendments that would be seen as improving legislation.
“Filling the Tree” has the practical effect of turning the debate and amendment process of the Senate into a carbon copy of the House, where the minority has no rights except for those granted it by the majority.
Its excessive use by the majority leader in the Senate over the last few years was the result of the newer Democratic members not wanting to take the “tough” votes that were being brought forward by the minority.
Harry Reid wouldn’t fill the tree if the Republicans would agree to offer a reasonable amount of amendments that are germane to the underlying bill. But Republicans refuse to legislate in anything but troll-mode.
Umm, I don’t recall any change as to legislation, only as to judicial/executive branch appointments.
yeah, for now you are totally correct.
The Republicans are arguing that they only objected to everything because Reid kept denying them amendments by filling the tree.
But he only filled the tree because the Republicans kept insisting on having three trillion non-germane amendments filled with their talking point of the day.
Which means that Gregg is a lying sack of dog poo because he was there for part of McConnell’s scorched earth strategy and didn’t do squat when he could have.
“…where the minority has no rights except for those granted it by the majority.”
Don’t make me laugh. I’m going to say two words: The Hammer.
Ummm, the voters who were dumb enough to vote in the numerous millionaires in the senate.. to the point nearly half of the senate is comprised of millionaires.
until he left to be Secretary of State, John Kerry was the wealthiest person in the senate– right up there is Diane Feinstein as well. I’m telling you this in case people actually believe there’s only rich GOP’ers in the senate and that is the problem.
So what’s this have to do with the filibustering of judicial nominees?
that is the ONLY critical issue at the moment?
Sorry, not.
it’s a troll seabe
FYI, Tom Harkin is also extremely wealthy.
And… Harkin enjoys the same low taxes/perqs as the Millionaires across the aisle.
Harkin might be one of the good guys, but he’s not getting enough done, nobody in the senate is.
Republicans have been abusing Senate rules since day one; Judd “tyranny of the majority” Gregg and the Republican US Senate can suck the snotty end of Harry Reid’s fuckstick.
In any case, Gregg is among the last people to be credibly fomenting ethical outrage.
Latest News Today
New Technology this 2014
Visit Me Here!!
Oops, tried to rate the spammer a troll, but I think I rated everybody. Sorry. Not sure what to do in these cases.
Who broke the senate? The convention in Philadelphia, when they adopted the Connecticut Compromise instead of representation according to population in both houses.