.
Terrorist strikes during the Ronald Reagan administration, do stupid Republicans live on a short memory only?
As U.S. Looks to Nuclear Deal, Book Faults Handling of Iranian Defector by Mark Handler
WASHINGTON (NY Times) — To those who lost loved ones in the suicide bombing of the American Embassy in Beirut, Lebanon, in April 1983, it is often called “the forgotten bombing” — overshadowed by an even deadlier attack on a Marine barracks at the Beirut airport six months later.
Now, a new book shines a spotlight on the embassy bombing, which killed 63 people, 17 of them American, including eight Central Intelligence Agency officers. One of those was Robert C. Ames, a C.I.A. operative who is the hero of the book, “The Good Spy: The Life and Death of Robert Ames,” by Kai Bird.
…
The decision to grant asylum to the Iranian intelligence officer, Ali Reza Asgari, was made by the George W. Bush administration in 2007, Mr. Bird writes, because he had valuable information about Iran’s nuclear program, including that it had built a uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.[Doubtful, the Natanz facility was revealed at a press-conference by the National Council of Resistance of Iran held in Washington, DC in mid-August 2002 – source]
…
But while Mr. Baer said Mr. Bird’s reporting is persuasive — he said he knows some of the sources the author consulted in the region — he noted that the book contains no smoking gun establishing Mr. Asgari’s whereabouts. Indeed, Mr. Asgari may no longer be in the United States.Mr. Bird said that when he asked a former senior Bush official about the decision to grant Mr. Asgari asylum, he received a cryptic reply: “At the unclassified level, I cannot elaborate on this issue.” He cited a report in Der Spiegel, the German newsmagazine, that Mr. Asgari twice called a fellow Iranian defector — from Washington, where he had been held in a C.I.A. safe house, and from “somewhere in Texas.”
Stuart H. Newberger, a Washington lawyer who represents victims of the 1983 attack, said he believed the book was accurate, though he could not corroborate the Asgari disclosure himself. He said he had supplied Mr. Bird with trial transcripts and internal government documents he had obtained for his litigation.
“Asgari got a get-out-of-jail-free card because of the Iran nuclear issue,” Mr. Newberger said.
For the Obama administration, Mr. Bird’s revelations could be awkward. Mr. Newberger said it should make terrorism an issue in any negotiation about relaxing sanctions against Iran. But the White House has tried to keep the nuclear negotiations tightly focused on technical questions of Iran’s enrichment capability and international inspections.
“The Good Spy” is a vivid reminder of Iran’s prolific sponsorship of terrorism against the United States — a not-so-distant legacy. In January, Iran’s foreign minister and the leader of its nuclear negotiating team, Mohammad Javad Zarif, laid a wreath at the grave of Imad Mugniyeh, a lethal Hezbollah operative who the C.I.A. believes had an operational role in the embassy and barracks bombings. Mr. Mugniyeh was assassinated in 2008, probably by the Mossad, on information supplied by Mr. Asgari, who acted as his control officer during the 1980s, according to Mr. Bird.
None of this history is helpful to a White House eager to conclude a landmark nuclear deal. “People just don’t want to hear about Iranian terrorism,” Mr. Baer said. “Nobody has the appetite to dig this up. You focus on the battle you can win, which is nuclear.”
For Anne Dammarell, a retired American aid officer gravely injured in the Beirut bombing, Mr. Bird’s book solved a mystery of who masterminded the attack that nearly killed her.
But she said she was not outraged by the disclosure about Mr. Asgari. In the murky world of spying, she said, such trade-offs were sometimes necessary. “Most people understand that deals get cut,” she said. “You can be a very corrupt person and still die in your sleep.”
Because Hezbollah had no reason to attack US barracks, nor the intellectual ability to “mastermind the attack,” nor the means to put together the bombs. Asgari may well have facilitated the acquisition of arms and materials for the bombs — analogous to Rumsfeld doing arms deals with Saddam at the same time to aid Iraq in the stalemated Iran-Iraq war — but if so, it’s proof of nothing. American obsession with losses on foreign soil within the context of murky and shifting alliances in on-going local conflicts when the culprit isn’t easily or fully identifiable is one way the MIC/NSA/CIA continues to get a free pass for their dastardly deeds.
“Where in the world is Asgari” is a great parlor game for all sides. Sad for his family. And if he was abducted or killed by Israel or western powers but reported to have defected, sad for his reputation in his country. If he did defect, he could be cooling his heels in Virginia and when the time is right, will be seen again.
If you truly want “the MIC/NSA/CIA” not to continue to get those free passes, the only possible way to achieve that goal is a major political sea change in the U.S. A continuing bipartisan War Party system…a DemocRatic/RatPublican UniParty totally financed by corporate monies, in essence…will only serve to stir up trouble where none really exist and/or amplify conflicts that are really only local disagreements.
How do you propose to make that sea change happen?
Without such a change we will only be able to continue our impotent complaining about the situation. The information is freely available on any number of websites and has been so for decades now, and it does no good whatsoever. Only a political solution in the U.S. will change things.
What’s your solution?
AG
Not much changes in the feud between political parties in Lebanon. The Shiites with Iran backing, the Sunni with steering from Saudi Arabia, the Christian parties hosted by France and the U.S. The power of the US guarantees Israeli military operate with impunity in the Middle East. A report from 1987 …
○ UNSC Resolution 1559: Calls upon remaining foreign forces to withdraw from Lebanon (2004)
It seems like Hezbollah has morphed into something much more signifcant than imagined back a decade or two ago. I think Nasrallah is a pretty savvy leader.
It’s pretty predicable that the terrorist acts of the past would be brought out to derail the bigger plan of rapprochement with Iran.
I am curious as to Iran’s current use and thinking re terror. Anybody know?
Ever since George vowed to bring democracy to them Muslims in Mesopotamia, the battle lines between Sunne and Shia have been drawn. The Semite doctrine from the bible: eye for an eye goes for all parties involved. Iran terror can be witnessed in Balochistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Syria and Lebanon (Hezbollah).
Acts of terrorism will be perpetrated by Iranian Republican Guards.
.
The dissident, Amir Farshad Ebrahimi, was held for nearly 18 hours [on March 27-28, 2008], in a cell inside Istanbul’s Ataturk International Airport amid a tug-of-war over whether he would be sent back to Germany, where he lives, or deported to Iran, human rights activists and Western officials said.
In a series of phone calls from his cell, Ebrahimi said Iranian officials wanted him to answer for his role in the defection of Brig. Gen. Ali Reza Asgari, a former Iranian deputy defense minister and Revolutionary Guard commander who disappeared during a trip to Turkey.
Ebrahimi said Asgari now lives in the United States, where he is believed to have provided intelligence about Iran’s military capabilities and operations. …
[Source: War and Peace by Laura Rozen]