I was interested in politics at an unnaturally young age. I was born in 1969, but I was actively supportive of Jimmy Carter’s campaign for the presidency in 1976. I still remember one girl who voted for Ford in our second grade straw poll, and I never forgot her perfidy. I remained fiercely loyal to Carter when he was challenged by Teddy Kennedy, but I flirted with the candidacy of John Anderson. I actually watched the Republican debates in 1980.
I first became aware of Israel during the Camp David talks, and they were a great success for President Carter. I guess I thought the problem was solved, and I didn’t really think about it one way or the other. I certainly had no understanding of the underlying issues.
The first time I actually had to confront the Israel-Palestine question as a moral quandary might surprise you. Through the mists of time, I might get some details wrong. But I can kind of reconstruct it, I think. It must have been in 1982, shortly after Israel invaded Lebanon. I remember seeing on the news that Yasser Arafat was on the run and might be in the sights of Israeli gunships. The portrait that was painted was that Arafat was in imminent danger of being assassinated.
Now, I had internalized that Arafat was a bad man. He was a terrorist. But I also remembered him smiling and shaking hands with Menacham Begin on the White House lawn. I didn’t understand what was going on, but I guess I figured that the Palestinians must have gone back on their word. I was not inclined to be sympathetic to Arafat, but I didn’t exactly harbor any ill will towards him, either.
So, the next day, I went over to the house of a classmate after school. There I found my friend’s mother in a state of great concern for the well being of Mr. Arafat. She was adamant that the Israelis were committing some grave injustice and seemed horrified that they might kill Arafat. This confused me greatly because my friend and his mother were as Jewish as Jewish people can be. Why was she taking the side of the enemy?
But she convinced me that it would be a terrible thing if Arafat was assassinated and I remember having trouble going to sleep that night because I had joined her in her great concern.
As it turned out, either the Israelis never actually had a bead on Arafat or they decided that it would cause too much trouble to kill him. He survived and I was relieved, even though I still had no real idea why I should be relieved.
This all happened when I was twelve or thirteen years old. I would only really begin to learn about the Middle East when I took a class on the subject during my senior year in high school.
What lasted for me, however, was the idea that proud Jews could be so critical of the Israeli government and so sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians. Later on, I’d hear such people pilloried for being self-hating Jews, but I knew them well enough to know that there was no self-hate involved. There were values that were steeped deeply in Jewish tradition, and those values won out over any kind of stunted tribalism.
I’ve been reading a lot about the current conflict in Gaza and I keep seeing references to the way Israel used to be viewed in this country and in most of the West. I read about how they made the desert bloom and how they championed a kind of socialist paradise that was broadly admired on the left. I was too young to be subjected to that kind of propaganda or those kind of sentiments. I had just turned four during the 1973 war. I never had to unlearn my romantic feelings for Israel.
When I first began to become aware of the conflict, I was pretty immediately subjected to a Jewish family validating the Palestinians’ grievances while they deplored the actions of the right-wing government in Israel.
If anything, I’ve moved right on the issue since then, seeing more of the Israeli’s point of view. But, given where I started, that isn’t saying much. I was basically given permission from the outset to call it as I see it without giving a crap if I am seen to be taking sides in favor of one tribe over another.
For that, I am still grateful for that fortuitous visit to my friend’s house over thirty years ago, now.
Update [2014-7-31 9:7:36 by BooMan]: As happens when a 44 year old tries to reminisce about being a twelve year old, I conflated Sadat with Arafat when I talked about the White House lawn. My apologies.
The Thrasybulus Syndrome: Israel’s War on Gaza
If anything, I’ve moved right on the issue since then, seeing more of the Israeli’s point of view.
Even now?
Arafat shaking hands with Menachem Begin on the White House lawn after the Camp David Accords???
You are thinking of Anwar Sadat,the then-president of Egypt.
Arafat was adamantly opposed to the ’79 Camp David Accords and would have spit in the eye of Begin (and Sadat).
See this article from the BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/26/newsid_2806000/2806245.stm
you’re right. I conflated the two incidences.
So very true …
“There were values that were steeped deeply in Jewish tradition, and those values won out over any kind of stunted tribalism.”
I’m quite confused by what you are saying, I suggest you listen to that Jewish family you mentioned. The Jew-haters should be those people endangering the existence of the state of Israel. Yes, the right-wing folks, fascists one can find in every western nation: Naftali Bennett, Danny Danon, Avigdor Liberman and Bibi Netanyahu. Their dream is Eretz Israel, building more settlements on Palestinian land with the Jordan river dividing the Palestinian state with Israel. They refuse to take any attempt by broker U.S. for peace serious. They endanger the security of the United States itself and they know the risk of their endeavor.
○ Gaza War: Bringing Out the Worst in Israeli Misogyny, Racism
○ Russian billionaire to found ‘Jewish Al-Jazeera’
○ How Politics and Lies Triggered an Unintended War in Gaza
I don’t understand the point of taking sides. Yes, there are children being killed by israeli bombs and that is truly awful to even think about. We pretend that our thoughts and feelings matter in this conflict, but they don’t. To be outraged by injustice in that part of the world is a 24/7 full time job. Ultimately the politics and religions don’t even matter. This conflict is a reflection of basic human nature. When people lose their minds on such a scale, the only prudent action is to get out of the way. I wish the US government would do just that. Stop pretending we can mediate, stop sending money to any of them, and let them exhaust themselves in a fight.
just get out and stay out. It is absurd that the US should be so involved in the Middle East.
It is not out fight.
And Sadat was assasinated–in 1981. Among those in the plot was Ayman al-Zawahiri, current “leader” of al Quaeda (remember them?).
BTW I became aware of the Israel/Palestine conflict through the novel Exodus by Leon Uris. Not the best grounding in history. But the early 1960s were the era of a great deal of political romanticism and thinking of our better natures. The details of the Holocaust were just entering public consciousness, in part because a generation of college students in the late 1950s had Eugen Kogon’s The Theory and Practice of Hell in translation on the reading list in their college history classes. The newly independent states evoked the romanticism that surrounded the American Revolution. And then there was the political mood that got labeled “Camelot” surrounding the Kennedy administration.
Diary of Anne Frank, Mila 18, and Exodus for me. I was 13-14 when I read those and needed a few more years to grow up and understand that the first two were fine but the third warped my views. Recalling my youthful naivete and romanticism is why I get uncomfortable seeing children at political rallies.
I’m not sure this shows you becoming aware of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Doesn’t it show you becoming aware of a conflict between the Leon Uris-type Zionism of U.S. public discourse and the liberal Zionism of your Jewish friend’s family?
Muscular Zionism v. lite Zionism isn’t the Israel-Palestine conflict, but I think conflating the two is a very common phenomenon among those of us who grew up in Western societies where Zionism is the default prism for viewing everything in the Middle East. We are used to switching on cable T.V. and watching Wolf Blitzer moderate a discussion between Dore Gold and Michael Lerner, and that’s considered balance.
My first introduction to the Israel-Palestine issue was from reading “Exodus” by Leon Uris, with its heroic Zionists redeeming the land from the base, animalistic Arabs. And then, just to be fair, I remember I made a point of reading “the Haj”, which told “the other side of the story”, as the cover insisted. (“The Haj” was also by Leon Uris, and told the story of base, animalistic Arabs who were too dumb to know that the heroic Zionists had arrived to redeem their land!). I cringe about my naivete now, but I don’t think my experience was too atypical.
The idea that there are billions of people who don’t identify with Zionism of any stripe, and that they should have a seat at the table, has been simply anathema for most of our respective lifetimes. I’m of a similar age to you – I too remember Lebanon being a wake-up call, though more because of Sabra and Shatila than because of Yasir Arafat – and I still find this privileging of Zionist discourse very difficult to shake.
I honestly don’t know if they subscribed to Zionism at all.
But, the argument against Zionism is an argument against the existence of Israel, and that’s not really a productive conversation. We can have theoretical discussions about the existence of Israel, but we shouldn’t expect our policy leaders to waste time on that.
I don’t know if they were Zionist either, that’s why I couched my second sentence as a question. But it doesn’t change the point I was making, i.e. that like a lot of us you became aware of the Israel-Palestine conflict in a way that didn’t involve Palestine or Palestinians, and that affects how you think of it now.
Actually, that’s completely contradicted by what I wrote. I became aware of the issue when Sadat and Begin hashed out an agreement and I only began to care (a little) about it when Arafat was in danger. I didn’t really learn about Zionism until my senior year in high school, long after I had been concerned about the treatment of the Palestinians.