Digby makes some observations:
Turn on Fox News on any given day and you’ll be convinced that white Americans can hardly get a break these days.
The ongoing conversation about race in the U.S. has evolved in recent years to include a lament from white Americans that they are the real victims of racism. Yes, that’s a fairly bizarre interpretation of how our society operates but it’s a surprisingly widespread belief among a certain sub-group of Americans. In some ways this idea goes all the way back to the Civil War when Southern slave owners felt they were being put-upon by non-slave owners by not being allowed to expand their institution into new states and so staged the most epic hissy fit of our nation’s history. They always felt persecuted by people they believed were trying to destroy their “way of life,” but the loss of that war was the catalyst for an ongoing sense of victimization, often believed to accrue to the benefit of African-Americans. The civil rights movement and resulting federal action to deny states and cities the right to discriminate further inflamed those feelings. A part of white America believes, and has always believed, that African-Americans are at the heart of all their troubles.
I know that there is a strong continuity of anti-black feeling in this country that can be traced seamlessly back to Jim Crow and slavery when being explicitly and unapologetically anti-black was an overt, viable, and constant political position in this country.
But there was a break at some point when this open racism ceased being respectable and had to go underground. When I was growing up in the seventies, there were fights about school busing and the forced integration of school districts, but people (at least, politicians) were generally polite enough about it to avoid making their arguments in an explicitly racist way. The grievances and prejudices were nurtured, however, by the Conservative Movement. Call it “The Southern Strategy” or the “Reagan Democrats” or whatever you want, but stoking resentment of black access to quality education or black poverty or black crime became the most potent political argument that conservatives had, and it allowed them to not only make comebacks after the disasters of Goldwater and Watergate, but to literally take over control of the Republican Party. When the Democrats realized they had a problem big enough to threaten their historic dominance of Congress and to shut them out of the White House in seeming perpetuity, their answer was Welfare Reform and “Mending, not Ending, Affirmative Action.”
The most important point I want to make is that it doesn’t matter if there are some valid reasons for people to be skeptical about the effectiveness or fairness of government programs aimed at redressing past disenfranchisement and discrimination and inequality of opportunity and inequality before the law. We should expect taxpayers to be concerned about how their money is spent, and we should expect people to worry about policies that give others an advantage over them in education or business. If poverty and disparate outcomes persist in the face of programs aimed at combatting them, we should expect people to question the utility of those programs. Liberal efforts to wage a “War on Poverty” and even the playing field have not been successful across the board and should not be above critique.
But the Conservative Movement, as exemplified by Fox News, goes way beyond critique. Their political strategy/business model is based not on finding better policies to alleviate poverty, redress past wrongs, and improve the black condition in this country. Their model is based on convincing white Americans that they “can hardly get a break these days.” The model demands an increase in white racial animosity for minorities (usually blacks), along with an insistence that “secularists” are interfering in their way of life by doing things like waging a “War on Christmas.”
The main problem with this is that it involves a commitment to wage a campaign of constant 24/7 activity to make people like and trust each other less than they otherwise would.
In other words, people would be worried about the fairness of the system and the efficacy of public policy whether or not politicians told them anything. But one party/movement in this country is dedicated to telling them that they are getting screwed because they’re white, and the message remains the same even when conditions change or the specifics cannot warrant the charge. White people are told to resent and fear and mistrust minorities (particularly blacks) and secularists, and the result is that they resent and fear and mistrust those groups more. They are worse people because of the messaging they receive from the Conservative Movement. They’re angrier than they should be. They’re more afraid than they need to be. They’re more hateful than is healthy.
This is what is so morally wrong with conservatives and their movement. They make us worse people. They divide us and fuel our worst human frailties and shortcomings. They weaken us as a nation.
And it is a (pardon the pun) progressive disease. It gets worse as the years go by.
But it mainly effects the people who are most saturated with hate-messaging, which means that a gulf has opened up between most of the country, which is growing more tolerant and open-minded about issues of race, gender, and sexuality, and the Republican Party’s political base, which has begun to abandon science because they’ve been led so far away from reality in the effort to sustain their state of fear and insecurity.
So, now we’re at the point where we are beginning to see signs that openly racist messaging is on the verge of becoming respectable again. When right-wing politicians start justifying the murder of black citizens by white police officers regardless of the specifics of the case, we’re one step below the level of just calling for a system that acknowledges white supremacy as the natural and “correct” order of things. We’re just one step away from openly saying that equality before the law is not the goal, and never should be.
Recent remarks by Rep. Peter King and Rudy Giuliani, plus the openly-expressed sentiments of countless white citizens, indicates that we’re dangerously close to a situation where white supremacy is just one side of the political argument…again.
And we have the Conservative Movement to thank for that.
It’s difficult to argue against this point of view, IMO. The New Racism isn’t going away anytime soon, as the white majority is now is a state of high aggrievement, intentionally fueled by the conservative movement and its corrupt media arm, the 24/7 Noise Machine, undertaken as a route back to political power. Worse, their machinations are not accepted or portrayed as racism or white supremacy.
The reduction is white hate in the 70s (if one is willing to agree it occurred) was likely the result of (finally) passing federal civil rights legislation and making a legal environment where open racism simply wasn’t legal anymore, and the institutions of open racism (schools, police forces, etc) had to be modified. We won’t have a similar inflection point again, so the ongoing rise in white “grievance” won’t have a countervailing force to check it. That these extremely frequent indefensible police killings of black citizens now have absolutely no effect on the conscience of most whites demonstrates this.
The New Racism is going to be focused more on electing “conservative” Repubs (i.e. the White Party) who are happy to spread the message of white supremacy since they have effective immunity as elected officials—although many “aggrieved” whites will be willing to convey the message personally as well. Obviously King and the horrendous turd Guiliani are not suffering any obloquy for their racial “explanations” of white police brutality. Instead, they are being cheered as far as I can tell. Their success will encourage other Repubs.
In short, the conservative movement has released a malevolent genie that we’re unlikely to get back in the bottle. To a large degree “conservatism” is simply spite masquerading as a political philosophy. And that spite is apparently now going to result in more minority people being killed, to the (more uninhibited) cheers of whites.
The Republican Party would be outlawed in Germany as a neo-fascist hate group.
In the reconstruction of Germany fascism has been restricted to board rooms.
It’s the true trickle-down: the racism starts at the top, with those racists “elected” to obstruct progress; the fire then fanned by the equally racist mainstream media, who have a vested interest in the subsequent violence; boiling the white dogs’ innate upbringing to the surface.
Boo, your delivery strikes me as one who has a modicum of understanding of the world I grew up in, though with kids the age of my grand-kids you may be close but not quite my age. I wonder how you feel about watching fifty years of progress, fifty years of my life, flushed out to sea like so much offal.
The Republicans are Fascist:
Dr. Lawrence Britt of Source Free Inquiry studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile) and found the regimes had 14 things in common, which he calls the Fourteen Identifying Characteristics of Fascism. Fascism Anyone?:
I’ve been dating US Fascism proper to around 1947 myself.
We didn’t just import Nazi scientists and spies.
America’s love affair with fascism dates at least to the thirties, though most researchers agree its roots are in fact in the Klu Klux Klan. Hitler was quite enamored of both the Klan and America’s solution to the “Indian Problem”, which he referenced frequently in his Politics of Living (or Breathing) Space.
I just use 1947 because of all the things that culminated around that year. It had been ongoing since before and continued after, but that year had a lot of stuff going for it, if you’re a fascist.
–House Un-American Activities demonizing Hollywood (still happens by our fascists today)
–Taft Hartley (still in effect: Reagan strike-breaking, right-to-work)
–National Security Act (NSA, CIA, nuff said)
–Truman Doctrine increasing US-Soviet tensions
–Executive Order 9835 Loyalty Oaths
And a whole lot more!
I don’t think it’s quite accurate to call the Confederates fascists, but I’d give them at least 9 out of 14 on that scale there.
You say tomato, I say tomato.
Proto-fascists, fascists-in-waiting, Americanized Fascists, etc.
I think that’s a fair assessment.
The plantation aristocracy in power believed in the internal improvements that would subsidize their transport of crops for the export market.
In politics, the economic powers were joined at the hip with the political powers.
The state was dominated by a militia system rooted in every local settlement, whose purpose was to prevent slave rebellions and those who might aid slave rebellions. I have not doubt that Quaker clergy were suspect until they changed their liturgy to resemble their other Protestant neighbors.
An ethnic group was marked by a constantly visible characteristic that determined their legal status.
They conducted a war to extend the boundaries of their system into additional room for living the plantation lifestyle.
After defeat in that war, they maintained a terrorist campaign to undermine the political rights of the marked ethnic group.
Military men and “captains of industry” moved back and forth in a post-Civil War revolving door.
Members of post-Civil War political organizations were given blanket immunity for crimes committed against the marked ethnic group.
Local political organizations carried out organized pogroms against the marked ethnic group, including summary extrajudicial torture, execution, and defacement.
The only part that the Confederate hardcore missed was industrialized genocide.
Yes, behind that anti-socialist, “free enterprise”, “no new taxes” facade is a fascist with a gun rack and gun in his truck and waving a Confederate flag. In Washington state, Indiana, Oklahoma, upstate New York, New Hampshire, Michigan, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississsippi, Lousiana, Arkansas and Missouri. In Texas, the neo-Confederate fascist wave both Confederate flag and a Lone Star flag.
I think the characterization is more apt than not even though the term is anachronistic.
The original fascists were the officers of the Roman state given arbitrary authority to enforce the law by whipping you with the bundle sticks and then beheading you with the axe, with your head displayed somewhere publicly to deter other miscreants. Only the methods of execution and display depart from this in lynching.
Not trying to suck up, but I know you made some entries when Booman was out.
I think you need to be a permanent voice like Brendan. You have a way with topics, specific and general knowledge, and a way of reaching people.
I would like to second n1cholas’ comment. The point you’re making here, and your longer one below on the history of the modern conservative movement, are really important. I recommended that latter one to the people at Balloon Juice yesterday because I think that it’s important for that kind of work to get spread around more widely.
If you have any inclination to write more, or get your work seen by more people, I hope you will follow it. I agree with the assessment that BooMan should invite you to write as a front-pager.
Yes: Team Optimism says, for what it’s worth, these spasms are terrifying, but they’re death throes of a doomed way of thinking. The Party of Increasingly Blatant Racism is not made up of normal conservatives, but they are conservative in the traditional sense of fighting against ineluctable change, the operative thing being that the change really is ineluctable. To me Giuliani doesn’t sound any different or more openly racist than he did 25 years ago, but he does sound 25 years older and more irrelevant. Maybe noisier, his resentment heightened by the awareness that his time is passing, but it’s passing fast.
Reagonomics, income inequality, fascisme and superiority of race, and after 9/11 nationalist tendency plus Islamophobia also plays a role to demonize a large part of American society. Can’t simply put the blame on Republicans or the other 26% of voters electing a President.
○ President Obama? Many White Supremacists are Celebrating | Southern Law Center | June 11, 2008 |
“Electing America’s first black president would be a very good thing. It’s not that the assortment of neo-Nazis, Klansmen, anti-Semites and others who make up this country’s radical right have suddenly discovered that a man should be judged based on the content of his character, not his skin. On the contrary. A growing number of white supremacists, and even some of those who pass for intellectual leaders of their movement, think that a black man in the Oval Office would shock white America, possibly drive millions to their cause, and perhaps even set off a race war that, they hope, would ultimately end in Aryan victory.”
○ Blood and politics : the history of the white nationalist movement from the margins to the mainstream
○ Making Racism Respectable: Islamophobia in Sarkozy’s France
I’m afraid I’m going to have to warn you, Oui. Last night someone over at Balloon Juice told me that there is no tendency to fascism in the US. Now get back in line before the hits you with a ruler.
And we have the Conservative Movement to thank for that.
And The New Republic!!
You mean “even the liberal New Republic”.
Brilliant analysis, Booman, but I think it’s a case where it is respectable as opposed to “almost”. And I blame not only Rethuglicans and Fox, but mainslime meda who feature Ann Coulter on their programs (Today Show) and others who claim Rush Limbaugh is a “talented entertainer” for starters. Then of course they blindly repeat lies and rumors instigated by malicious reich wing bloggers. That’s why I refer to media as “mainslime”. The media have made racism respectable.
There is not so much a continuity of anti-black feeling in this country (that depends on the aggregate of intra-personal relationships) as a continuity of anti-black institutions capable of propaganda and serious sanctions for those who depart from continuing the divisions in society that ensure that a minority plutocracy can dominate society.
The structure of these institutions are always based on divide and conquer with the following structure: the enemy within, the ally within, the enemy without, the ally without. That structure depends on a manufactured internal conflict and the manipulation of real or imagined external conflicts. In the late 17th century when the categories of “black/Negro”, “white”, and “Indian” were given social content and expectations, the institution of slavery, the institution of Indian trading, the institution of white indentured servitude, the institution of a conscripted military, royal government, and the frontier or perpetual Indian war acted to keep the same people in power, increase their wealth, and burnish their cultural importance. You can see the shadows of those institutions today after incredible transformation.
Employment contracts are the counterpart of indentured servitude. The failure to raise the minimum wage, the suppression of unions, and the wink-wink-nod-nod system of immigration are the institutions equivalent to the free labor of slavery; indeed, for some immigrants they are no different from slavery. And the theft of resources by the elite is no different.
In retrospect the period from 1945 until 1980 was a peculiar exception to this cynical social architecture. First of all, industrial labor unions used the occasion of the war to gain power for the first time in history by their organized power to shut down war production in strikes and by the wartime organization of the economy that the Roosevelt administration undertook to offset inflation and material shortages. Second, the ideology of Nazism was explicitly racist and anti-Nazism could easily be broadened to anti-racism. Third, the economic policies and the extent of the war damage left the United States as the most prosperous nation after the war. People who had never had savings in their lives came out of the war with sizable enough savings accounts. Running the economy at near full production and rapidly expanding plants and equipment for the war effort left a lot of dual purpose infrastructure that lowered the cost of producing things after the war. Fourth, the corrosive rot of crony capitalism had not set into the military contracting for the war and there were still some modicum of control over boondoggles if only through the reminder, “Don’t you know there’s a war on?”
What happened with civil rights after World War II was far from spontaneous. It was the success of a strategy that was worked tirelessly by people like Thurgood Marshall, A. Philip Randolph, and others. And the hatred for a time was transferred from blacks to the Japanese. But throughout, the operation of the institutions of American society presumed segregation; just watch the movies from that period. And segregation was an institution whose sole purpose is to signal second-class citizenship an provide a basis for discrimination in the distribution of social benefits, such as the right to life, the opportunity for a job, equal pay for equal work, opportunity for an education. It was also an institution to disadvantage white workers. The South could tolerate the organizing of white-only unions, like craft unions, but brought out the Home Guard when union organizers sought to build desegregated unions. Why? Because the employers were clear that a desegregated union would cut of the cut-rate strategy of hiring blacks as scabs and firing them when the threat of a union was past. They also knew that hiring blacks as scabs would heighten the racial divisions and make it less likely that a desegregated union could appear in the future. Finally, they knew that frustrating organizing consistently would turn off the openness of workers to the appeals to organize. At the same time, the period of increased union interest were also the period of increased organization of white only organizations in which the “betters” were collegial with the “lessers” and in which anger could be whipped up and ritualized. In the post-World War II South, the third KKK arose in a period of renewed organization of textile workers and other industrial occupations, a new push from the Teamsters Union, and increased enlistment in the armed forces by blacks after Truman desegregated the armed forces. Those new institutional arrangements threatened democracy. Conservatives even in the midst of McCarthy’s ascendancy were frantic about losing forever the privilege of the do-nothing rich. Young William Buckley’s screed about Yale (it always is those secular elite institutions, isn’t it) became their thin hope because Eisenhower wasn’t acting like one of them. So frantic did they become that Koch daddy organized a society with a guy who claimed Eisenhower was a Communist. In the midst of this stewing came Brown v. Board of Education, which rightly said that segregation was a badge of second-class citizenship and ordered schools to desegregate.
America is a land of the rule of law, right? Look at America 50 years after the court ordered all schools in the country to desegregate. By elevating the legal status of blacks from second class to first class, whites reacted as if their first class citizenship was being taken away from them. Because every single other institution in the country, and not just in the South, was segregated in some way or another or left open to hidden discrimination. By far the most egregious example was housing in non-Southern cities and towns. And white riots were used to enforce it even when laws didn’t.
The ideology of white supremacy always was a national ideology. When it was finally suppressed for a brief period from 1965 to 1980, it was suppressed nationally, and it took heavy organizing by Jesse Jackson (that guy whites love to hate) to get minorities on national media and hired by the national press. And he did the same in the late 1960s and early 1970s in a lot of local markets including his home town of Greenville SC. At the same time that a local surgeon was writing weekly letter-to-the editor screeds about Medicare as socialism and the communist menace and states rights; this is the guy who started the county’s Republican Party organization that gave us Jim DeMint. Of course, the media today can have both a face that looks like black members of their audience and also spouts the white supremacist line. But those are institutional arrangements of preferences in hiring and media owners being able to intimidate someone who desperately seeks to be successful.
Ronald Reagan started his campaign for President in Philadelphia, Mississippi, symbolically dancing on the graves of Goodman, Schwerner, and Chaney. And the national Democratic Party establishment though that Reagan was a joke and couldn’t be elected–just after he had yanked the Southern Baptist Convention from Jimmy Carter and politicized it. Well not the Gipper literally, but W. A. Criswell, Adrian Rogers, Paul Pressler, William Powell, and Paige Patterson. It was arch-segregationist and Baptist preacher Jerry Falwell who first went against the Baptist doctrine of separation of church and state in his “I Love America” rallies beginning in 1976.
In 1979, Dr. Robert Grant and Richard Zone united several anti-gay and anti-pornography organizations into Christian Voice to oppose President Jimmy Carter’s influence with the then apolitical and often liberal or moderate Christian community. At that point the religious right allied with the political conservative movement was Paul Weyrich, Terry Dolan, Richard Viguerie, and Howard Phillips (or as Robert Grant called them when he called for Falwell to start a religious right organizations “three Catholics and a Jew”). Grant’s calling out cause Falwell and Weyrich to form the Moral Majority in 1979. Although Moral Majority had chapters established all over the United States, it was a Southern-oriented organizations because of Falwell’s influence. Falwell essentially leveraged this institution off of his sizable and independent Thomas Road Baptist Church. It amounted to a federation of themed political action committees. The leadership was made up from the Falwell-created Baptist Bible Fellowship. The larges affiliate of Moral Majority was the chapter in Washington state, but there were 20 state chapters at its height. Falwell’s ad branding Jimmy Carter as a traitor and no longer a Christian was a significant dog whistle at Carter’s support for desegregation. The national media were either complicit or blind to the significance of that ad.
Robert Billings, the executive director of Moral Majority, was the liaison between the group and the Reagan campaign. Per the Wikipedia entry on the Moral Majority.
And that is how the institutions interested in preserving white supremacy as a doctrine injected that back into the political mainstream.
There are some interesting wrinkles about the history of Falwell’s segregationist church. It was formed in 1956 with 35 members. And Jerry was “called to be it’s pastor” at age 22 having just graduated from Bible Baptist College. Typically, new Baptist churches of that period result from schisms in established Baptist churches; one group then goes out and starts a new church. This is two years after Brown v. Board of Education, a period in which many Southern religious were fabricating theological defenses of segregation. It would be interesting to know what churches the original members left and why. Or maybe the members felt that a established Baptist church with business roots was not sufficiently anti-Community or departing from the Bible or…there are many possibilities.
It took these monasteries of segregationist thought to last long enough to ally with the anti-Vatican II conservative Catholics and their newfound issue of abortion and with the homophobic antipornography icky sex Protestants, Catholics, and Jews appalled by hippiedom.
Note that Howard Phillips was already post-Watergate, having failed at age 32 to shut down the Office of Economic Opportunity and started the Conservative Caucus on the rebound. He later broke with Reagan over hiring of James Baker as Reagan’s chief of staff. Another figure who keeps turning up in various institutions and campaigns like a bad penny. If you want “Christian” contempt for the poor, you can’t miss with Howard Phillips’s newly acquired moralistic evangelicalism. Boston-born. Born Jewish. Harvard trained. Buried in a Catholic cemetery. Phillips is also allied with Pat Buchanan and the US Taxpayers/Constitution Party, which bids to be the philosophical home of the Taxed Enough Already (TEA) Party.
These folks created the institutions that vetted the primary challengers who won office and extended the realm of white supremacy, diplomatically cloaked, back into government. And under the guise of reducing socialism and wasteful spending.
This is not a matter of feelings, it is a matter of power and status. Its time to stop being distracted by the psychologism of “human nature” that is the red herring that was the core defense of segregated schools in Brown v. Board of Education.
White supremacists don’t hate black people; they hate black people who aspire to be first class citizens.
And there are little institutional dodges like this one. Cubicle culture has thin walls and you often hear interviews of job applicants. I have heard managers say to applicants, “I wish I could hire you but we have a quota under affirmative action, and I must hire a minority.” It was a lie in lots of ways. But it was mostly a brushoff for a candidate the manager had decided not to hire; the manager typically after this statement hired a white guy. This manager also blew off the “diversity training” that the corporation he worked for regularly provided. Because he knew that his bosses up the line would cover for him and punish any whistleblowers. It is institutional. It is a flaunting of status. It’s not personal. And yes, it is very middle school.
Gee, a well-written piece. It seems like these people you mention were organizing to perpetuate racism. But wouldn’t that be a conspiracy theory?
I find it interesting the Paul Weyrich shows up here. Weyrich had an NGO, I think the name was the Free Congress Foundation (so it couldn’t really be a bad thing). It was to help bring democracy to eastern Europe and the former USSR. Sort of like the NED but more to the right. Many of the people had connections to former wartime fascist formulations in the region, but I’m sure that that wasn’t any purposeful choice made by FCF.
The countries where he was most successful now have little Nazi parades every year. Lithuania, Latvia, Hungary, etc. What a coincidence! And everyone loves a parade.
Weyrich also had a little think tank–the Heritage Foundation.
Must have been a great man. And Heritage. I mean what’s bad about Heritage.
I so wish you posted at other blogs.
I reposted the historical part of this in a comment at Firedoglake. And I typically post comments on Delores Oliver-Velez’s Sunday posts on Daily Kos. These days most of my posts on racism tend to be historical because there is so much hidden history that even well-read progressives don’t know.
For example, the bit about the architecture of racism and the frontier in the late 1600s is from a section in Gerald Sider, Living Indian Histories: Lumbee and Tuscarora People in North Carolina, a book exploring the origins of a group claiming tribal identity that explores where exactly the indigenous peoples of the Southeastern Piedmont went as settlement rolled through that part of the frontier. It describes the complex interactions of white, black, and red in an isolated part of the backcountry (because of swamps) and how cultural identity was formed out of the refugees of several towns and groups.
The stuff on the Southern Baptist coup, Falwell, and the origins of the Moral Majority were from being in Georgia and North Carolina when this was transforming both of those states by rolling back the gains of the 1960s–supplemented by referencing Wikipedia and following down some of the links. For example, the role of Christian Voice in transmitting racism forward was something that I was not aware of until I read the origins of the Moral Majority.
Feel free to copy as much as you need for wherever you wish to copy it. Exactly how religious conservatism got politicized as institutions is something that need wide recognition of. The GOP seizure of power was not magic.
This is a critical point. Their political structure and institutions were consciously built. They used good strategic planning to create conditions where they could take care of fortuitous circumstances when they came along.
I’ve seen some of the history of the Moral Majority in Geoffry Kabaservice’s “Rule or Ruin”. But it sounds like you saw and lived through a lot of it, your part of the country was a hotbed of the rise of the right wing back in the day and it still is today. You may have some specialized knowledge that is not broadly disseminated.
I’d like to second rikyrah’s comment — please consider writing this stuff down systematically and publishing it more broadly. The right wing is not going away, we’re going to have to build a resistance (and I use that word with intent), and we can’t do that without a good historical grounding in who they are and where they come from. And that includes going all the way back to the Civil War as you did in one of your comments above.
Please also consider getting front-page status somewhere (this would be as good a place as any). I quit reading Firedoglake years ago when they decided that opposition to the ACA was a good hill to die on. It’s good to know you comment at DK but I never would have known to look for you there — and frankly the signal-to-noise ratio is so low at DK that I wouldn’t have bothered to try.
Being on the side of big money did help.
Any specialized knowledge I have is from Southern Baptists who were caught up in the coup and schism, and who decided to part ways with the Southern Baptist Convention. That was about a third of the congregations and a all of the prestigious universities like Wake Forest, Furman, Mercer–I dunno what Baylor did. And the rise of a more politically correct group of universities like Campbell University.
Boo, I agree with you that white supremacy is almost respectable in some arenas, but there is one big difference today. Businesses want to sell products and services to anyone that will buy them. This fact holds the white supremacy in check to some degree. This was not the case in the South years ago. Those Mom and Pop businesses have been replaced by national/international corporations who are mostly color-blind. Even the existing Mom and Pop businesses are more interested in making money, rather than holding on to principle and refusing customers. Sure there are some old-timers around, but they’re getting retirement age. Also, the higher educational institutions in the South are much more sensitive to any actions that appear racist and quickly attempt to redress the issues.
It was true in the South after the NAACP launched their quarter campaign in which blacks shopped only with quarters. When merchants understood what a boycott could do to their businesses, a lot of Chamber of Commerce organizations encouraged the politicians to quietly introduce a policy of desegregation of public accommodations.
That is a constraint, but only when minorities use it as such and demonstrate that they are indeed ready to take away their business and how much business they can take away.
It is the political unity of minorities and their supporters and the salience of the issues that hold white supremacy in check. Blue Dog Democrats undermined the first and prosperity tends to undermine the second.
Unfortunately poverty tends to undermine the second too…
This was the “freedom of speech” Palin brought to the 2008 general election campaign; freedom of bigotry to finally speak its mind. It’s been downhill ever since; thanks Sarah.
She also gave a huge boost to loud and proud ignorance.
For wilful ignorance and righteous entitlement.
So how does it creep in where it’s ok to hate and then to feel it’s ok to openly express that hatred? That takes a while plus some good organized propaganda to bring those deep feelings that were already there back to the forefront. To understand this just replace Black with Jew, go back to 1933 and imagine we are in central Europe. Scary isn’t it?
Remember that Rush Limbaugh has been on the air in some rural areas for 25 years this year. And in a lot of areas, his was for a long time the only political voice on the radio for a decade. Now the alternatives are folks wanting to make money by being crazier and more racist than Rush.