The Republicans had a great Election Day in November 2014, which means that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is now the chairman of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Space. With NASA being headquartered in Houston, this ought to be an easy marriage, but Ted Cruz is a somewhat deranged ideologue.
This is already causing problems.
Senator Cruz held a hearing today where NASA Administrator Charles Bolden was invited to testify. It did not go well.
Cruz took issue with the Obama administration’s $18.6 billion budget request for NASA. He was particularly incensed that the budget called for increasing the money spent on studying the Earth and a decrease in the money spent on exploring space.
“I would suggest that almost any American would agree that the core function of NASA is to explore space,” Cruz said. “That’s what inspires little boys and little girls across this country. It’s what sets NASA apart from any agency in the country.”
Before I go on here, I’d like to note that when Senator Cruz was a student at Harvard Law, he refused to study with anyone from the “minor Ivies,” meaning anyone who did not get their undergraduate degree from Harvard, Yale, or Princeton. Despite this, he still begins sentences with “I would suggest…”
With that out of the way, Charles Bolden, who is a retired Marine Corps Major General and former astronaut, was compelled to explain some basics. For starters, you can’t launch rockets from the bottom of the ocean.
“We can’t go anywhere if the Kennedy Space Center goes underwater and we don’t know it — and that’s understanding our environment,” NASA Administrator Charles Bolden told Cruz on Thursday. “It is absolutely critical that we understand Earth’s environment because this is the only place we have to live.”
Yes, we also live here. That’s important. I’m glad that Bolden remembered to point that out.
“The fact that earth science [funding] has increased, I’m proud to say, has enabled us to understand our planet far better than we ever did before,” Holden added. “It’s absolutely critical.”
For example, Holden said, NASA supports studies in Cruz’s home state of Texas that measured the effects of emptying out the state’s aquifers on local land elevations.
“That’s just looking at our environment, trying to make sure that we have a better place for all of us in which to live,” he told the senator. “I think that’s critical.”
Here’s a picture NASA produced in 2011 of Texas’s depleted aquifers (red means “no water here”).
Did I mention that Ted Cruz is seriously considering making a run for the presidency?
You can actually get a fuller sense of what an asshole Ted Cruz is by reading The Daily Caller’s coverage of this hearing. Their summary explains it quite well.
Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz told NASA Thursday to stop worrying about global warming and focus on its “core priority of exploring space.”
Politicians from Texas do not want spies in the sky looking at their lack of water or any of the other consequences of burning fossil fuels. They don’t want seismologists looking at the earthquakes caused by fracking.
Science is bad for business.
He’s a blowhard. Not smart enough to recognize that he doesn’t know anything about important national public policies and issues nor curious enough to study up enough to know when a smart person would defer to the knowledge and expertise of a professional.
Please proceed Senator Cruz — that intellectual heft you’ve been lugging around on your shoulder is looking more and more like a feather that mysteriously was enough to bamboozle some college professors.
Y’know, if NASA actually spent it’s time exploring and opening up space we might be able to build O’Neill Cylinders and have someplace else to live.
If may not be much (actually it’s a beautiful, complex, and wondrous world), but it’s all we’ve got. We’re not getting off this rock. Not dismissing the possibility of establishing a moon colony, but it would be very expensive and other than the view of earth, it would suck as a place to live. Other than that, we can send off strands of our DNA into outer space and if in hundreds of years they happen to land on a planet habitable for homo sapiens, hope there’s some indigenous to kill us off before reconstructed homo-sapien descendents wreck another planet.
All the more reason to throw money and time at megastructures and solar system autonomous mining IMO. I am partially teasing as Iobviously think studying climate change is extremelyimportant, but its no secret I think were doomed on this world already.
That said, I am a human supremacist, its why I’m a lefty.
Oh, I suspect we will be getting off this rock, or a select some of us one day, should conditions become such that it sucks more to stay than to live off-planet. Not just that we’re heck bent on destroying our planet by polluting and robbing it of its natural resources and stabilizing infrastructure, but also because we seem headed towards another world type war, further poisoning things.
Good idea therefore to have a Plan B in place should the need arise. Although I think it’s more likely that before we try off-planet, we’ll try underwater living.
Vonnegut’s Galapagos. A draconian, semi-adaptation.
While it was never easy, humans have managed to roam and inhabit of most lands on earth and did so with limited tech, innovation, wealth, and collective effort. Perhaps China will lead the way to colonizing the universe — at least they can build lots of HSR while we dick around “we can’t afford it.”
In our economic system, the O’Neill Cylinders need an economic reason to exist. Survival off a polluted Earth is too abstract for 99.9%
What if survival off a polluted earth is impossible for earthlings?
Still waiting for my flying personal vehicle. Instead all we got are big-screen TVs and little screen phones/watches. heh. The space station is now obsolete and the US can’t even get there on our own.
Lacking any understanding of the ivies, lesser or … (the opposite, whatever that might be), I don’t get the dig about ‘I would suggest…’. After all, Cruz might be a common snob.
Judging by the map, the Keystone pipeline might be better utilized bringing water to Texas.
I hope you’re kidding
just in case your comment is simply ignorant – TX shares the aquifer, just that they’ve mined out their part. in other words your idea amounts to yes, let’s give MT and NE’s prehistoric water to those spendthrifts to squander instead of, say, raising food for ppl with it
Yes, I wasn’t being entirely serious. However it could make sense in certain circumstances, to pipe water from areas of plenty to areas of scarcity – and to charge for it so that it isn’t wasted. Climate change could make parts of Texas uninhabitable otherwise. And yes, I know some Texans are partly responsible for that…
the climate in other parts of the plains over the Ogallala is arid as well, just that they manage their grasslands. TX has to start responsible agriculture – actually there are some good things happening in that regard. But absolutely no, under no circumstances should other parts of the country be penalized for being responsible w. their share of our resources. it’s called robbing Peter to pay Paul after Paul binged for a century or so
well isn’t their big thing oil etc? if they decided to go solar and manage their grasslands they’d recover [there are some major wind projects already in TX]
the TX part doesn’t extend so far into their very red area, and it’s closer to the surface;
here’s the map
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=ogallala+aquifer&id=2A955695D28A9DF70F0CFBEE219C528CD55C0F24
&FORM=IQFRBA#view=detail&id=2A955695D28A9DF70F0CFBEE219C528CD55C0F24&selectedIndex=0
Looking at that map puts a whole new perspective on Red and Blue America, where Blue apparently means we have water.
I’d agree to spend more money to put a man on Mars if Ted Cruz would agree to be that man.
I am wondering how many papers and grades lil’ ted had to buy to graduate…
Science is bad for business now. Business as usual is bad for business later.
Willfully ignorant would be the best description of him.