Look, I’ll freely admit that I’m grateful that Mary Landrieu held one Louisiana’s two Senate seats for the Democrats as long as she did. Considering the corruption the Bayou State is so famous for, she had a clean record. I understand that her state’s economy is heavily reliant on the mineral extraction industry, so I’m a little (not too much) forgiving of her odious record on climate change. She was not a bad senator, at least when compared to most of her colleagues.
But I am getting disgusted by how one senator after another gets lucrative lobbying jobs virtually as soon as they leave office. You can sometimes discern that outgoing senators are angling for these jobs by how they vote. There’s a reason that there is a two-year ban on former senators lobbying the Senate, and the intent is to prevent this kind of corrupting influence. I’d like to see a minimum six-year ban (since a single Senate term is six years) if not a lifetime ban. This is bullshit:
Landrieu said she will join Van Ness Feldman as a senior policy advisor, working closely with another recent hire, former Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Wash., the former top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.
Former senators are barred from lobbying their former colleagues for two years after the end of their congressional careers. For Landrieu, that means she can’t lobby colleagues until January, 2017. But she can lobby members of the executive branch, and is free to provide Van Ness Feldman clients with strategic advice.
Now, Norm Dicks spent his time in Congress authorizing the invasion of Iraq and using his senior position on the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee to keep Boeing fat and grease the Military-Industrial machine.
Here’s an idea, Dicks: go get a job that doesn’t peddle death and violence. Enough already!
I think people should start insisting that people who are running for office pledge that they will never lobby Congress after their elected career in DC is over.
… allowing pedophiles to be priests. That this is legal simply defies the imagination.
If you pensioned them off handsomely enough, they wouldn’t bother going the lobbyist route.
It would be cheap enough — the entire legislative branch, Library of Congress and the Architect of the Capitol included, runs around $2 billion. That’s couch-cushion change.
But then, we’ve got posters on here who don’t think Congresspeople should even get salaries.
It’s the hard-earned (and lucrative) reward for her many years of service. Or so she would probably say.
Me, back in November.
http://www.boomantribune.com/comments/2014/11/19/16593/265/8#8
In the early 90s I lived in Seattle. That’s when there was huge controversy over how much, if any, of the old growth remaining at the time would be preserved from logging. Norm Dicks was totally in the back pocket of the loggers. God, I hate that guy!
OK, I’ll play along. Let’s say someone pledges to not become a lobbyist after they end their congressional career.
They end their congressional career. They become a lobbyist.
What are the consequences?
The point is that the incentives for lobbying are pretty amazing. They can make boatloads of money. Since that is the case, Congress is highly unlikely to end the system, since that would mean that in the future, current congressional persons would be deprived of boatloads of money.
You need an incentive structure to end this. What is that? Until you come up with one that is likely to be voted on, it will continue.