Bill Clinton’s Labor Secretary Endorses Bernie Sanders
« click for more info
The Morality of a $15 Minimum ... A Living Wage!Tweet from Robert Reich:
I endorse Bernie Sanders for President of the United States. He’s leading a movement to reclaim America for the many, not the few. And such a political mobilization – a “political revolution,” as he puts it — is the only means by which we can get the nation back from the moneyed interests that now control so much of our economy and democracy.This extraordinary concentration of income, wealth, and political power at the very top imperils all else – our economy, our democracy, the revival of the American middle class, the prospects for the poor and for people of color, the necessity of slowing and reversing climate change, and a sensible foreign policy not influenced by the “military-industrial complex,” as President Dwight Eisenhower once called it. It is the fundamental prerequisite: We have little hope of achieving positive change on any front unless the American people are once again in control.
I have the deepest respect and admiration for Hillary Clinton, and if she wins the Democratic primary I’ll work my heart out to help her become president. But I believe Bernie Sanders is the agent of change this nation so desperately needs.
○ From BooMan’s fp story – Re: Clinton Now on Glide Path to the Nomination
I’ve always been grateful to hold a minority opinion, even in the Democratic Party: from the Vietnam War till today. No anomosity towards Bill or Hillary, just making an honest assessment.
DNC vice chair resigns, endorses Bernie Sanders
Representative Tulsi Gabbard has resigned from her post as vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee in order to support Bernie Sanders. She made the announcement on the NBC show Meet the Press.
“I think it’s most important for us, as we look at our choices as to who our next commander in chief will be, is to recognize the necessity to have a commander in chief who has foresight, who exercises good judgment,” she said.
Gabbard, an Iraq war veteran and representative for Hawaii, is the fourth member of Congress to endorse Sanders. She elaborated on her decision on the show: “As a veteran and as a soldier I’ve seen firsthand the true cost of war.
“I served in a medical unit during my first deployment, where every single day I saw firsthand the very high human cost of that war. I see it in my friends who now, a decade after we’ve come home, are still struggling to get out of a black hole.
“I think it’s most important for us, as we look at our choices as to who our next commander in chief will be, is to recognize the necessity to have a commander in chief who has foresight, exercises good judgment, who looks beyond the consequences, looks at the consequences of the actions they’re looking to take, before they take those actions, so we don’t continue to find ourselves in these failures that have resulted in chaos in the Middle East and so much loss of life.”
Veteran congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard says police should not act like military | UPI – 2014 |
Prophetic words from Martin Luther King Jr. in 1967:
“Choice between War and Fighting Poverty at Home”
More below the fold …
Let’s no forget MLK, Jr. … and lonely struggle
Let’s no forget MLK, Jr’s popularity within the AA community when he shifted from pure civil rights
to anti-war and a class based economic critique. The Black Panthers did some of that as well.by Marie3 on Sun Feb 28th, 2016 at 12:27:02 PM PDT
Who knew that an old VT/NY democratic socialist Jew wouldn’t be popular with SC AA voters?
But with 13% of the SC AA vote, that’s not too shabby considering that:A Harris poll conducted after King’s Vietnam speech found that only 25 percent of even
African Americans supported him in his antiwar turn — “only 9 percent of the public
at large agreed with his objections to the war.”Did anyone else here at the Pond watch the live broadcast of MLK, Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech?
As a kid it was a stretch for me to understand it fully, but it was clear to me that it was important
and it thrilled me on a deep and profound level.Beyond Vietnam — A Time to Break Silence
Delivered 4 April 1967, Riverside Church, New York City
by Marie3 on Sun Feb 28th, 2016 at 01:08:16 PM PDT
This speech of MLK has been in my signature line for a number of years:
His eloquent speech ended thus:
Now let us begin. Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter — but beautiful — struggle for a new world. This is the callling of the sons of God, and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard? Will our message be that the forces of American life militate against their arrival as full men, and we send our deepest regrets? Or will there be another message, of longing, of hope, of solidarity with their yearnings, of commitment to their cause, whatever the cost? The choice is ours, and though we might prefer it otherwise we must choose in this crucial moment of human history.
As that noble bard of yesterday, James Russell Lowell, eloquently stated:
Once to every man and nation
Comes the moment to decide,
In the strife of truth and falsehood,
For the good or evil side;
Some great cause, God’s new Messiah,
Off’ring each the bloom or blight,
And the choice goes by forever
Twixt that darkness and that light.Though the cause of evil prosper,
Yet ’tis truth alone is strong;
Though her portion be the scaffold,
And upon the throne be wrong:
Yet that scaffold sways the future,
And behind the dim unknown,
Standeth God within the shadow
Keeping watch above his own.
.
MLK – a visionary with prophetic words. Had the courage to go against the mainstream America. Had wrestled with this decision between loyalty to the president and his conscience. Bullits kill more than just a man: MLK and RFK in 1968. In the 1960s US government inserted fear of the red wave in the America’s, Africa and Southeast Asia: domino theory. Since 9/11 Bush/Cheney/Sharon inserted fear of the black-flag Islam into US foreign policy for self-interest. Creating the movement of another right-wing fascism across the Western world.
Society doesn’t react with mass protest. Why?? There is no place for solidarity on such a large scale. People need to hang on in their lives, family, jobs and low income. High incarceration rates and lacking of universal health care for all. Don’t rock the boat, leave us the status quo. Law enforcement is well equipped to quell protest, subdue the underprivileged and keep the powerful 1% on top. Bill and HRC have done well financially, but can and will they represent the 1% or 47%?
Equal opportunity starts before birth, but quality of primary education is crucial in people’s lives with opportunity to develop one’s talent at college or university level. A lot has changed since MLK, but the “white folks” are always pushing back to reverse equal rights. Wall Street, the banking crisis and the trillion plus expensive march into Baghdad has cost Mainstreet dearly.
○ I Have A Dream- Remembering Martin Luther King, Jr. by refinish69 on April 4, 2008
The dream of MLK was shortly relived in the person of senator BHO. He drew the crowds, inserted enthusiasm and hope and the appreciation of AA in America showed on Election and Inauguration Day. Hillary is no Barack!
Excuse me …
.
A small minority has spoken .. too early to tell. The emotional are breaking for HRC, what’s good for America’s future and the Democratic party? I would still trust a political revolution to change the dynamics of run-away capitalism. HRC is just too close and indebted to Wall Street and the Israel lobby (New York). My vote for an Elizabeth Warren, just not yet her time. 🙁
2012 Group Obama Romney
All Voters Pct. 51% 47%
SEX Men 47 45 52
Women 53 55 44
RACE White 72 39 59
Afro-Ameri 13 93 6
Hispanic 10 71 27
Asian 3 73 26
Other 2 58 38
In South Carolina HRC and the Clinton gang owe an awful lot to Rep. Jim Clyburn
Martin Luther King Jr.: “Saving the Soul of America.”
○ Martin Luther King – Beyond Vietnam, A Time To Break Silence on April 4, 1967 [Full Speech – Audio]
[Getting the chills all over hearing MLK speak – Oui]
○ Period Vietnam War and its aftermath: 1960-1970s sees US government spending, low unemployment, surging labor costs, economic inflation, dollar crisis 1971, monetary inflation turning into a recession.
h/t Juan Cole’s Informed Comment
○ The entrance polls said Nevada’s Latinos voted for Bernie Sanders. [‘That’s unlikely’]
○ Yvanna Cancela, political director at the Culinary Workers Union Local 226, about Hillary Clinton’s return to Nevada on the campaign trail | MSNBC |
Culinary Workers Union Local 226 (PAC)
Barack Obama (D) D $1,188,567
Harry Reid (D) D $1,014,666
Clinton won with the backing of unionized Black and Hispanic workers at “six major Las Vegas casinos” … Culinary Workers Union — which was officially neutral — [emphasis added].
A bit contradictory as had CWU members backed Clinton, the union wouldn’t have remained neutral. Many unions have endorsed her without the backing of their members. So, it wouldn’t be a stretch to consider that among CWU members, there wasn’t enough support for Clinton for the union leaders to go ahead and endorse.
Just a moment again Warren Buffet was interviewed on CNBC to speak about Wall Street, Berkshire Hathaway and US politics … he still has admiration for Bernie Sanders. Sanders is one politician standing today and not changing his views. He provides clarity and answers all questions.
Always tough to adjust ratings for people that operated in a different time and under different conditions. Compare JFK and Hillary during their time in an administration in their respective interactions with Moscow. IMHO, Hillary was more belligerent than JFK who actually resolved issues peaceably.
○ Battle against oblivion: the defeat that ended French colonial rule in Vietnam | The Guardian |
○ Obama Will Visit Vietnam in May 2016 to Boost Ties | The Diplomat |
I listened to a discussion on Dutch radio with 4 students attending Websters University on Leiden campus in The Netherlands. Students were divided in 2 Republicans and 2 Democrats and were asked about the election and how they observed it from outside the US. All four were equally abhorred by the circus and show man Trump. The two Democrats would vote for Sanders and the two Republicans were split, one was for John Kasich and the other was split between Rubio and Kasich. If Trump would be the Republican nominee, one of the Republican students would vote for Sanders and with a Trump as president, one of the students said she would not return to the US but live abroad. A particularly strong showing for Bernie Sanders!
○ Why are there suddenly millions of socialists in America? | The Guardian |
In 1906 German sociologist Werner Sombart wrote an essay entitled “Why Is There No Socialism in the United States?” that sought to explain why the US, alone among industrialized democracies, had not developed a major socialist movement.
Today, however, we need to pose a different question: why are there socialists in the United States? In this nation that has long been resistant to socialism’s call, who are all these people who now suddenly deem themselves socialists? Where did they come from? What do they mean by socialism?
Thank you for the link. It was most interesting to read.
it’s pretty late but maybe tomorrow I can make some comments on the ideas. I don’t want to answer off the cuff.
True socialists when it comes to determine the outcome of primaries …
Posted earlier in my diary – Robert Reich Endorses Bernie Sanders .. and More.
1.) The Democratic Party has had superdelegates since after the 1976 convention when Jimmy Carter swooped in out of nowhere to grab the nomination and after the debacle in 1972 of George McGovern getting his ass handed to him.
They came up with them for the purpose of overriding a really stupid selection in the primaries, which they had just had two in a row. That Carter won the WH has nothing to do with it. Running as an outsider – like Sanders – when he got to Pennsylvania Avenue he was VERY handicapped in what he could do – and in fact – sa much as I REALLY like Carter – he was the beginning of the downfall of the party.
2.) Since then, the Democrats have never even come close to using the superdelegates to reverse the choice of the primary voters and caucusers.
3.) The Republicans have 168 Party Leaders who fulfill the same function.
4.) In 2008 a grand total of 25 superdelegates changed their selection, in the immediate aftermath of Obama clinching the nomination. Some people in Sanders’s stable seem to believe that these superdelegates are going to change the outcome of the nominating process. This has never happened. If it was GOING to happen, 2008 would have been the erect time.
5.) Obama was a member of the party his entire political career.
6.) Sanders still hasn’t been n the party one year. The first time he asserted he was a Democrat was not in an announcement. It was when he filled out his NH primary filing form on April 30, 2015. For anther full 6 months he was publicly still calling himself an Independent. To this day nobody is really sure if Sanders is a Democrat.
7.) Superdelegates is not the official term. The official term is Party Leaders and Elected Officials (PLEOs). Guess which kinds of people get designated PLEOs. Actual lifetime members of the party. Give me one good reason why they should pledge to a party newcomer vs someone who has been active for over 40 years.
8.) Sanders knew the score when he joined the party. If he didn’t, he should have had his lawyers check it out.
9.) The Democratic Party is a private organization and the law allows such organizations to create and modify their in-house rules.
10.) Clinton is drawing something like 56% of actual Democrats. Sanders in Vermont had 40% independents who crashed the party, and from whom he took 90% of the vote. His other states he’s done well in are much the same – large influxes of invading independents. 72% of the Sanders voters in the NH primary were self-identified as independents. That amounts to about 109,000 of his 152,000 votes. He only got 42,600 votes from Democrats, versus Clinton’s 95,300 – 69%. Clinton SLAUGHTERED Sanders among actual Democrats.
As of the data on TheGreenPapers.com, so far in the primaries and caucuses, the vote totals are:
Clinton – 4,013,741
Sanders – 2,625,505
Coulkd people quit bellyaching about Sanders being more electable and more popular? The numbers tell who is
Those numbers – 4,000,000 for Clinton vs the 2.6 million for Sanders comes out to 60.45% for Clinton – in spite of the invasion of independents.
NONE of those were superdelegates.
Oui –
I have no idea why Reich – a former Cabinet member – endorsing Sanders is newsworthy. Hillary has at least ten times more endorsements than Sanders. She has four CURRENT Cabinet members as well as 23 former Cabinet members.
Reich brings Sanders’ former Cabinet members endorsing him up to exactly ONE.
We can compare all sorts of other endorsement categories, and in all of them Clinton far exceeds Sanders’ endorsements.
He has exactly ONE former Senator, none that are current. He has a whole FIVE current Congressmen and one former one.
She has FORTY current Senators and 13 former ones. She has 163 current Congressmen and 48 former ones.
The list goes on and on and on…
Did you also post when those 203 current members of Congress or 23 former Cabinet members gave HER their endorsements?
Bernie Sanders is better for America at this point in time.
“He who carries the youth carries hope and ideals”
Great find – good read! h/t mino
○ Thoughts on Bernie Sanders’s Democratic Socialism and the Primary | Roosevelt Institute |
○ Noam Chomsky: Bernie Sanders has the best policies
Period Vietnam War and its aftermath: 1960-1970s sees US government spending, low unemployment, surging labor costs, economic inflation, dollar crisis 1971, monetary inflation turning into a recession.
The economy seemed trapped in the new nightmare of “stagflation,” so called because it combined low economic growth and high unemployment (“stagnation”) with high rates of inflation. Traditional macroeconomic policy tools seemed powerless to deal with this new beast. In the 1960s, the idea of a stable inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation (known as the “Phillips curve“) became part of the economic-policy orthodoxy. If the unemployment rate was high, inflation was likely to be low, and vice versa. This “tradeoff” left policymakers with the means to combat unemployment or inflation when either appeared separately.
When facing a recession, policymakers could lower interest rates, increase government spending, or lower taxes to stimulate demand and bring down the unemployment rate, at the cost of some increase in the inflation rate. When dealing with inflation, they could raise interest rates, lower spending, or raise taxes to reduce demand and “cool off” the economy, at the cost of some increase in unemployment. When high rates of inflation and unemployment appeared simultaneously, however, orthodox policy seemed to lack a solution.
[Source: That ’70s Crisis]My interpretation was always the US government wiyh it’s monetary policy made the western world pay for the cost of the Vietnam War. In linked article I can understand the three periods in the 20th century where capitalism failed the happy 1%.
The most severe crises may actually threaten not only the established framework, but even the continued existence of the capitalist system itself. In the last century, there have been three periods of profound crisis in the framework institutions of U.S. capitalism: the Great Depression of the 1930s, the crisis of the 1970s, and the current crisis.
…
The radical economists Samuel Bowles, David Gordon, and Thomas Weisskopf, in their influential book Beyond the Waste Land, identified three key pillars of the postwar social structure of accumulation, which they termed the “limited capital-labor accord,” the “capitalist-citizen accord,” and the “Pax Americana.”
[My earlier post @MoA]
Interesting read in light of the Bernie Sanders campaign …