Competitive primaries help voter registration and particularly party registration (in states where you have to register with a party to vote).
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
11 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
Agreed. I don’t think there’s any doubt it helped Obama — in numerous ways, from building campaign infrastructure, to registering voters, to honing his skills — in 2008. Everything will be fine so long as our party comes together in support of a single candidate at the end of the day.
… and clearing the field for anointed candidates is a terrible idea. At all levels of government
Agreed. If Clinton hadn’t tried this time she’d probably have multiple candidates to her left splitting the left-wing vote, and the challengers would have gotten some national exposure for other races.
As I see it, the only positive thing that’s come out of this year’s strategy is a primary challenge for DWS. 🙂
Oh, and the Sanders movement is definitely a positive, and it’s stronger since the field was so weak. Sanders has changed the conversation.
http://action.timcanova.com/page/m/29b53407/5f6715a5/16de5f55/69c186b9/2391294284/VEsF/
It’s quixotic and Pollyannaish, but, what the Hell, throw the guy the price of a Margarita.
Considering Sanders has brought in $39.7 million in March alone, with a hoped for $43 million by the end of this month (source: McClatchy), there’s a helluva lot of margarita drinking going on!
Yep!
Sounds like a good reason for having closed primaries–as a way to encourage competitive races by convincing the parties it benefits them.
I like same-day registration – get everyone registered you can.
OT: uh huh
uh huh
hmmmmmmm
………..
Tech C.E.O.s Held a Secret Meeting with Top Republicans to Stop Trump
Billionaires, tech C.E.O.s, and G.O.P. leaders all converged to discuss the Republican front-runner.
BY MAYA KOSOFF
MARCH 8, 2016 9:42 AM
The most powerful people in the technology sector, along with other billionaires and top Republicans, flew to a small island off the coast of Georgia last weekend to attend a secretive forum, where they discussed, among other things, how to keep current Republican front-runner Donald Trump from winning the party’s presidential nomination, the Huffington Post reports.
Among the cabal of tech C.E.O.s who met at the remote Sea Island Resort for the American Enterprise Institute’s annual World Forum were Apple C.E.O. Tim Cook, Tesla Motors and SpaceX C.E.O. Elon Musk, Napster C.E.O. Sean Parker, and Google co-founder Larry Page. Top Republicans, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker Paul Ryan, Senator Tom Cotton, and Karl Rove also attended the forum, as did billionaire G.O.P. donor Philip Anschutz and New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger.
…………………..
Trump wasn’t the only topic that had attendees squirming in their seats. Senator Cotton and Apple C.E.O. Tim Cook also had an uncomfortable debate over encryption. Apple is currently in a legal battle with the F.B.I. over an iPhone that belonged to one of the terrorists in last year’s San Bernardino attacks. “Cotton was pretty harsh on Cook,” one source told the Huffington Post, adding “everyone was a little uncomfortable about how hostile Cotton was.”
G.O.P. leaders and experts both at Sea Island and at a recent Republican Governors Association retreat in Park City have strategized about how to defeat Trump, either by beating him at the polls, or by denying him enough delegates to prevent a brokered convention, in which Republican delegates would be freed up to vote for another candidate. A presentation shared with The Washington Post by operatives from an anti-Trump super-PAC shows where some G.O.P. leaders see the front-runner’s vulnerabilities, though others think anti-Trump efforts are futile. Trump’s success hinges on one thing: a set of primaries in states including Ohio, Florida, and Illinois on March 15.
In Colorado 37% of registered voters are unaffiliated. I read recently, but cannot recall where, that nationally 47% of registered voters are independent/unaffiliated/fail to state. I will probably re-register unaffiliated after the Democratic convention. The super delegates all started campaigning for Hillary before our Democratic caucuses. Colorado went 59% for Bernie, with 60-65% of most counties favoring him. The party has shown no loyalty to its liberal base. I want to let the conservative poohbahs at the top know I return the “favor.”