The governor of Wisconsin can serve for as many terms as he wants, provided he can keep getting reelected, of course. Back in January, around the time that he delivered the annual State of the State address, Scott Walker sent out a fundraising email that said, in part, “Our re-election campaign may seem like a long way off, but the other side is already gearing up for a bruising battle.”
Not everyone took this threat to run for a third-term very seriously:
The missive was aimed at helping retire more than $1 million in debt his federal campaign had amassed before he abandoned his run for president in September.
Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca (D-Kenosha) said he wasn’t buying it, noting Walker’s low approval ratings as measured in polls by Marquette University Law School. He said Walker is simply trying to avoid being seen as a lame duck.
Obviously, Walker’s presidential campaign fizzled so badly that it died in the crib long before a single voter went to an Iowa caucus. He had taken a lot of criticism for ignoring the needs of the state. Yet, precisely because his presidential ambitions hadn’t amounted to anything, he suddenly lacked any obvious political future unless he ran for reelection. And the idea isn’t all that far-fetched. Tommy Thompson served as Wisconsin’s governor for 14 years and 28 days between 1987 and 2001.
Remember, too, that Walker cited the need for the party to unite around an opponent to Trump as one of his reasons for dropping out early. That’s something that Trump remembers, and it’s becoming an issue now as the Republicans get ready to vote in the Wisconsin primary.
“I’m all in” for Cruz, Walker said Tuesday.
“I really beat (him) up badly and he walked out frankly in disgrace,” Trump said of Walker’s exit from the presidential race. “I’m surprised he’s got any juice left in Wisconsin.”
Trump might be surprised about Walker’s remaining strength in the Badger State, but according to Marquette University Law School’s 2016 polling, 84% of Republicans still have a positive view of the governor.
And that’s something that is going to really get put to the test in the primary, because Trump is running against Walker’s record as governor. He’s running aggressively against his record:
Trump is trying to win the Wisconsin primary while repudiating his party’s most influential figures here. He bragged Tuesday about crushing Walker’s presidential bid. He accused him of sowing discord and starving the schools because he refused to raise taxes.
Wisconsin has problems, Trump said in Janesville, but “you have a governor that has you convinced that it doesn’t have problems.”
Trump also said that Wisconsin “is doing very poorly,” and is “losing jobs all over the place.”
On that last point, the truth is relative.
A review of those federal data showed that Wisconsin’s unemployment rate is at its lowest point since 2001 and that the state now has more than 2.9 million jobs, a figure it last reached in late 2007. But Wisconsin’s job growth during Walker’s tenure has lagged the national average and the fortunes of neighboring states.
The Democrats (and Trump) focus on the fact that Wisconsin has lagged behind the national average and neighboring states like Minnesota, but Republicans focus on the positive trends. The local GOP is not happy to hear Trump echoing Democratic talking points, and they aren’t pleased that their presidential frontrunner is calling them a disaster for refusing to raise taxes and wanting to take away people’s entitlements:
Calling in to a Rockford, Ill., radio station Tuesday morning, Trump said [Paul] Ryan was a “a really nice guy,” but “Paul wants to knock out Social Security, knock it down, way down, wants to knock Medicare way down … you’re going to lose the election if you do that.”
Said Trump: “I want to keep it. These people have been making their payments their whole lives … but they want to really cut it and they want to cut it very substantially, the Republicans. And I’m not going to do that.”
This all raises the stakes in Wisconsin considerably. If Trump can come in there and trash the governor, trash the Speaker of the House, and basically trash Republican orthodoxy on taxes and entitlements, and come away with a win?
Needless to say, the whole Wisconsin establishment is arrayed against Trump, including their formidable phalanx of suburban talk radio hosts. As I said above, the governor does still enjoy a very healthy approval number among Republican voters. If they can’t stop Trump, that will be a pretty strong indictment and a major show of weakness.
Even if they succeed in stopping Trump in the primary, unless he is prevented from being the nominee, it’s going to be hard for them to unite behind their candidate in the general election.
If Ted Cruz somehow gets the nomination, Walker will have a future in his administration. Otherwise, he’ll have to run for reelection or start shopping for a private sector job.
Yeah, I’d say that the stakes have gotten very high.
Can I wish for injuries? To Walker…
Since that seems to be the only way he’ll ever lose in the state, sure.
Should be interesting to see if the power of all the WI media that has been credited for electing Walker three times can use their muscle to give Cruz a primary win. From afar, my guess would be yes, but the real test of their power would come in November — could they flip WI to red with Cruz as the nominee?
I have no idea. The only thing I know for sure about Wisconsin politics is to take anything democratic activists say with a huge grain of salt.. It will be funny to see talk radio try to flip the state if Trump is the nominee.
Wisconsinites seem to have changed since I knew them a generation ago. In old Wisconsin, Trump would win in a walk, but new Wisconsin seems to be full of Christian jihadists.
I grew up there and no longer recognize the place….wouldn’t move back on a bet.
Wonder what the migration rate has been?
Well, that is no joke…Local blog: http://jakehasablog.blogspot.com/2016/03/dane-county-grows-while-rest-of.html
The only two Democratic places were Madison with it’s state workers and University and Milwaukee with its Union beer jobs and Union heavy equipment jobs. Those union jobs moved to the South and overseas and the city shrank.
BTW, did you notice the price of beer going down when production moved to non-union plants? I didn’t.
I hope Trump squashes him like a bug.
Scotty won’t have to “shop” for a job – the Kochs will make sure he has something cushy and 7-figure.
Beat me to it. The Kochs will be happy to fund lickspittle Scott for another run for Gov of WI bc that’s worked out well for the Kochs. If lickspittle cannot pull off another victory, I’m sure Unca Davie and Unca Chuck’ll find licky Scott a nice rewarding job somewhere in their empire.
What? Lickspittle Worry?
Not a chance.
“…Trump said [Paul] Ryan was a “a really nice guy,” but “Paul wants to knock out Social Security, knock it down, way down, wants to knock Medicare way down … you’re going to lose the election if you do that.
“Said Trump: “I want to keep it. These people have been making their payments their whole lives … but they want to really cut it and they want to cut it very substantially, the Republicans. And I’m not going to do that.”
This is what makes Trump, despite his glaring flaws, an interesting candidate. Lord only knows, I don’t want him to win. But when the actual truth flies outta his pie hole, it is interesting.
Do the dittoheads actually GET it, though?? That’s not what I’m sure about.
Ought to be good hunting grounds for Trump up there.
If I could believe that, he’s way to the Left of Obama who kept trying to cut/restrict SS and may make one last try.
The President has not offered the Social Security CPI change since 2011. Hasn’t been in his budget proposals for quite a while, and he is not talking about offering this at all in his last year. So no, Obama is not going to give it one last try.
The baseline budget numbers have been agreed to, the Social Security fund has not meaningfully deteriorated in the last few years, and neither Congressional Republicans or the President will cut any deal in 2016.
Everyone worries about the SS fund. In reality no fund is ever needed. It can be funded forever out of taxes but that “lock box” full of money, er IOUs!, gives us all a warm and fuzzy.
The White House has been talking about means testing. Various spokesmen say he’s open to a deal.
Where is Claude Pepper now that we need him?
Jesus. Really? Means testing?
Yes, they talk about millionaires but it’s just the foot in the door. Once you start, it’s the slippery slope. Like taxing SS benefits. it’s now down to taxing ordinary working people’s benefits when it started out with “rich folks”.
No, President Obama is not proposing means testing for Social Security. This is flatly untrue.
Good obfuscation, worthy of HRC herself, conflating the present tense with the past tense. “It isn’t now, so it never was.”
Your Wednesday 6:09 pm post uses lots of present tense language. Glad to gain this subsequent acknowledgement from you that the President is not proposing means testing Social Security.
“has been talking” Is not present tense. “is talking” is present tense. I’ll concede that by strict grammar rather than the vernacular, it should have been “had been talking”.
https://www.google.com/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=obama%2C+means+testing&ie=utf-8
&oe=utf-8
About 994,000 results (0.54 seconds)
nuff said ……
Look through the reports here. Tell us if you see a report which says that President Omama proposes, or has proposed, means testing Social Security. A very specific claim is being made here, and there’s no evidence I can find that it is true.
Didn’t Obama want to use SS as part of his grand bargain play? At least that’s what I recall and I can’t forget it.
That was an 11-dimensional chess move, my friend.
You forgot the /snark tag.
No, I’m serious.
You give new meaning to the word “exaggeration”.
Well, I’m a Wisconsin Democrat. I was pretty ambivalent about Clinton or Sanders until recently. I decided to go for Clinton. But I don’t really care who wins the Democratic primary.
And I could almost never vote for Trump. Not as a joke, not as a tactic… except when it comes to Walker. I would be so happy for Trump to give that guy a black eye. Someone talk me out of this.
Why settle for a black eye? Cut him off at his knees by voting for Sanders.
Talk you out of it? I URGE you to vote for Trump instead of Clinton.
It’s awfully cold during the winter in WI. I wouldn’t go there for a job, but some recruiter was trying to get me to go.
It used to be cold, when I was a kid. Snow would routinely fall before Thanksgiving. Now the cold seems more like an aberration than a regular part of the weather patterns.
Walker’s not a dumbass. Cruz is running about +5 on Trump in Wisconsin in recent polling. Yes, there have been some polling outliers in this cycle but they’ve generally been reliable, especially when there’s been more than one poll per week (as is the case in Wisconsin).
Maybe not a dumbass but definitely an asswipe!
He actually is a dumbass, but with a sort of reptilian cunning.
“including their formidable phalanx of suburban talk radio hosts” this made me laugh, not sure why
Reminds me of “nattering nabobs of negativity”.
Trump vs. Walker makes me root for Trump, which is a funny position to be in. I suppose I feel the same about Trump vs. Cruz.
It’s interesting, actually, now that I’ve been forced to think about it. In fact, it doesn’t require any thought, this is hardly an intellectual conclusion: Cruz is so odious I cannot imagine myself rooting for him against anyone, even Trump.
Cruz is so odious I cannot imagine myself rooting for him against anyone, even Trump.
Me neither. Although it would be a really close call between Cruz and Jindal. There are plenty that are as odious as those two, but they’re all sort of dumb.
Rubio and Jeb?
Puppets.