Steinmeier criticizes NATO ‘saber-rattling’ | Deutsche Welle |
On June 7, NATO launched exercises codenamed “Anakonda-16,” which simulated a Russian attack on Poland. The two-week-long drills involve some 31,000 troops, including 14,000 from the United States, 12,000 from Poland and 1,000 from the UK, as well as dozens of fighter jets and ships, along with 3,000 vehicles.
« click for more info
Steinmeier kritisiert Nato-Manöver in Osteuropa (Photo: Bild)Speaking to Germany’s “Bild am Sonntag” newspaper, Steinmeier (SPD) said more dialogue and cooperation with Russia are needed, not what he deemed military posturing.
“What we shouldn’t do now is inflame the situation further through saber-rattling and war cries,” Steinmeier said in comments made available ahead of publication on Sunday. “Whoever believes that a symbolic tank parade on the alliance’s eastern border will bring security, is mistaken. We are well-advised to not create pretexts to renew an old confrontation,” he added.
Steinmeier instead called for dialogue and diplomacy, saying it would be “fatal to now narrow the focus to the military, and seek a remedy solely through a policy of deterrence.”
He told the newspaper that a willingness to negotiate must also be present alongside military precautions, and that the alliance should be prepared to “renew discussions about the benefits of disarmament and arms control for security in Europe.”
- ○ NATO countries1 begin largest war game in eastern Europe since cold war
(1)In reality it's an exercise of the U.S. Army with Polish forces and a small token British force. Nato my ass!
Your book clearly suggests that Europe’s struggle to retain its cultural identity is practically lost. You confront the reader with the terrifying conclusion that various Western European countries, large and small, are undergoing an unstoppable process of Islamization. This process, which applies to everyday life, culture and institutions, is bound to continue in the years to come, changing Europe as we know it. Are you trying to frighten us and give us a wake-up call, or are you preparing us for living in a completely different world, even if on the same continent?
I am not trying to frighten anyone, because life itself is scary enough and so are phenomena that we’re losing control of. The processes you mentioned are driven by the tremendously expansive Islamic ideology. We are unable to resist it with our own, because we’re too lazy and like to think we know it all. On the other hand, we are tangled up in democracy and stuck with our own rules and codes. These prevent us from coming up with an adequate response to what’s been going on around us. We are slaves to our beautiful way of life, organized by laws and Enlightenment traditions. The thing is that those who are trying to annex our world have no respect for our codes. Islamic communities are foreign bodies to us “infidels” and that is how they see it, not we. They live in parallel universes that we have no access to. They don’t need us as we are at present, and they refuse to cooperate. Their foundation is a supranational community that relies on strict religious discipline and negates our way of life, and not just ours. Look at what’s been happening in the Middle East. The victims of the Islamists include their Muslim brothers whose views are not fundamentalist enough. We could completely ignore it all as long as the “repair” of Islam were confined to already Islamic territories. But Islam is invading our space as well, one step at a time. Such conquest is the most sacred obligation for every Muslim, radical or not. And since we’re not calling a spade a spade, at the end of the day we are supporting the expansion.
Author: Marek Orzechowski - the author of hundreds of publications, radio and television reports, including from the war in the Balkans. He has done numerous interviews with European and world political leaders. He was the winner of the "Europejski Ekran" Award in 2003 and he reported from Brussels and Strasbourg on the most important events associated with Poland's accession to the European Union. Between 1984 and 1987, he was an associate at "Radio Free Europe" in Munich and he is also a former Voice of America and "Panorama" TVP correspondent in Bonn (1988-1999). Until August 2006, he was the long-serving correspondent for TVP in Brussels. He has written several books, including "Holandia. Presja depresji", and his latest work is entitled Mój sąsiad Islamista. Kalifat u drzwi Europy (My Islamist Neighbor: The Caliphate at the Door of Europe), which was published in Poland in the spring of 2015.
I took the info at face value, however the veto power lies within the UN Charter and the Security Council when NATO operates outside it’s territory of member states as was the case in Kosovo, Iraq and recently Libya. A faint attempt to get the R2P doctrine to replace earlier triggers to use military force against a non-member sovereign state.
So you are right, a Brexit does not change this. Within the EU there are voices for a European military force and EU foreign policy. The British are strongly against this as this may undermine its sovereignty and NATO influence. A Brexit would cause the UK to lose it’s EU veto power to prevent such a decision.
Now I understand the force of the US to expand NATO outside of Europe and thus circumvent the UN and make the international institution irrelevant in matters of war and peace. The John Bolton doctrine déjà vu.
○ NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects by Bruno Simma
… and so the monster expands …
○ NATO’s Who Is Who
○ NATO Military Committee
Just seeing the name John Bolton sends shivers down my spine. There’s nothing worse than a neoconservative making cowardly excuses for not fighting in a war. His hypocrisy of warmongering while never having served in combat is most distasteful. This quote from Wikipedia says it all:
“Bolton supported the Vietnam War, enlisted in the Maryland Army National Guard and consequently did not serve in Vietnam. He wrote in his Yale 25th reunion book “I confess I had no desire to die in a Southeast Asian rice paddy. I considered the war in Vietnam already lost.”[16] In an interview, Bolton discussed his comment in the reunion book, explaining that he decided to avoid service in Vietnam because “by the time I was about to graduate in 1970, it was clear to me that opponents of the Vietnam War had made it certain we could not prevail, and that I had no great interest in going there to have Teddy Kennedy give it back to the people I might die to take it away from.”[17][18]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_R._Bolton
What is really galling is his reference to Teddy Kennedy. Ted’s oldest brother Joe was KIA while flying a bomber plane in WWII. JFK’s PT 109 boat was cut in half by a Japanese destroyer. Later, JFK & RFK were assassinated while serving their country, leaving Ted with no brothers by age 36.
War by proxy … how fitting for today’s policy by western powers for regime change in Ukraine, Arab nations and the Middle-East.
Sliding downwards on the ladder of courage and lacking statesmanship.
HRC and Amb. Ford were both rejected by the Egyptian people …
○ Townhall Meeting Ms Clinton with CNN’s Amanpour – June 2014
○ An Eyewitness Tells How The U.S. Amb. Robert S. Ford Instigated “Revolution” In Syria | MoA |
More bs … hoping the Leave camp wins tomorrow. As I have written, Britain is a key voice inside Europe for NATO aggression. See my earlier posts about the Atlantic Council, a think tank for ambitious neocons seeking a career in US foreign policy. I’m thinking about Yvo Daalder a few years ago: “make Russia a pariah state” ahead of further NATO expansion. Libya and Syria were well planned for turmoil and chaos. Serving ally Israel and the Gulf States by placing hrash sanctions on Iran. Must get rid of the axis Tehran – Baghdad – Damascus – Beirut and global terror of Shia funded by the Ayatollahs.
○ HRC foreign policy advisor Nicholas Burns: Articles for the Atlantic Council
○ Boston College – Nicholas Burns Biography
○ The Insiduous Role of the Atlantic Council: Securing The 21st Century For NATO