My reply to BooMan’s comment …
Re: Another Putin Front? Voice of America (none / 0)
This is an embarrassment to the site.
by BooMan on Thu Mar 23rd, 2017 at 12:46:51 AM PDT
Hillary won the popular vote with a big margin, nevertheless … it’s Putin’s fault.
- In the study, the researchers analysed 20 million election-related tweets created between September 16 and October 21, this year. They found that a high percentage of the political discussion taking place on Twitter was created by pro-Donald Trump — Republican Party nominee for President of the US in the 2016 election — and pro-Hillary Clinton — Democratic Party nominee for President of the US in the 2016 election — software robots, or social bots, with the express purpose of distorting the online discussion regarding the elections. Robots, rather than people, produced 3.8 million tweets, or 19 per cent.
How Twitter Bots Are Shaping the Election | The Atlantic |
The conservative political commentator Scottie Nell Hughes summed up the relative value of digits in a conversation with Anderson Cooper. “The only place that we’re hearing that Donald Trump honestly is losing is in the media or these polls,” she said. “You’re not seeing it with the crowd rallies, you’re not seeing it on social media–where Donald Trump is two to three times more popular than Hillary Clinton on every social media platform.”
The candidate himself has echoed this argument. During the first presidential debate, he touted a 30-million strong Facebook and Twitter following as a sign of mainstream popularity not reflected elsewhere.
The Clinton campaign, meanwhile, has stuck by traditional polls as evidence of her success.
Bots … Leaving BooMan Behind!
‘Bots’ step up for 2016 election news coverage
If you’re reading about the US election, some of that news is likely to come to you from a “bot”.
« click for more info »
Automated systems known as “bots” or “robo-journalism” have been around for years, but they are playing a bigger role in coverage this year amid technology advances and stretched media resources.
The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, NBC, Yahoo News and the non-profit Pro Publica are among news organizations using automated technology or messaging bots for coverage in the runup to Tuesday’s vote or on election night.
News organizations are increasing use both of systems which employ algorithms to create text from data, and of automated “bots” delivering updates to smartphones.
Turning data into stories
The nonprofit news site ProPublica’s election data bot, created with Google News Lab, updates every 15 minutes with election forecasts, campaign finance reports, Google Trends and other data.
Another nonprofit called the PollyVote Project delivers similar dispatches based on poll results and other data.
“Every time we get new data we create an automated news item,” said Andreas Graefe, a fellow at Columbia University’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism who is leader of the project funded by the Tow Center and Germany’s LMU Munich University.
“We can publish articles seconds after we receive the data, and we can do it in an unlimited amount.”Graefe said several studies in Europe have shown that readers cannot tell the difference between a human- or computer-generated news article.
“When you ask people how readable a story is, they rate the human article better, but when you ask them how credible it is, the computer is better,” he said. “We don’t really know why.”
Cambridge Analytica: US billionaire who helped bankroll Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency
It has emerged that Robert Mercer, a hedge-fund billionaire, who helped to finance the Trump campaign and who was revealed this weekend as one of the owners of the rightwing Breitbart News Network, is a long-time friend of Nigel Farage. He directed his data analytics firm to provide expert advice to the Leave campaign on how to target swing voters via Facebook – a donation of services that was not declared to the electoral commission.
Cambridge Analytica, an offshoot of a British company, SCL Group, which has 25 years’ experience in military disinformation campaigns and “election management”, claims to use cutting-edge technology to build intimate psychometric profiles of voters to find and target their emotional triggers.
From NY Times article:
The story began in September 2015, when a wealthy Republican donor who strongly opposed Mr. Trump put up the money to hire a Washington research firm run by former journalists, Fusion GPS, to compile a dossier about the real estate magnate’s past scandals and weaknesses, according to a person familiar with the effort. The person described the opposition research work on condition of anonymity, citing the volatile nature of the story and the likelihood of future legal disputes. The identity of the donor is unclear …
The story explicitly states ‘a wealthy Republican donor’.
Now if you scroll to the bottom of this article to ‘read more’:
[Source: How US billionaire Robert Mercer influenced Brexit and Trump’s presidential win]
