There’s a certain prurient attraction to the Stormy Daniels story but also a sense in which relatively view people care because they’ve already internalized all the lessons the affair can teach them. That Trump cheats on his wives is an established fact. That he would do it while his third wife was still recovering from childbirth is somewhat shocking, I guess, but this is a man who said a few years later while answering a question about whether it’s fair to pay mothers less than men who have the same job that Melania was “not giving me 100 percent. She’s giving me 84 percent, and 16 percent is going towards taking care of children.” In his mind, this justified paying women less and also helps explain why he’d seek sex outside of his marriage.
More interesting is the way Trump went about trying to keep this affair secret. His lawyer, Michael Cohen, is of interest for a lot more reasons than how he’s been handling this potential scandal. For one, he’s mentioned in the Steele Dossier as a key contact with the Russians. So, to the extent that the Stormy Daniels story peels back the shroud around his methods, it’s instructive. The fact that he acted like Trump’s Mr. Fix-It in his personal life lends weight to the allegations in the dossier that he “met with Russian officials in the Czech Republic to discuss how to cover up efforts by Trump campaign officials to collude with the Russian government, secretly pay hackers who infiltrated and leaked emails from the campaign of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, and [to] keep the hacking campaign going.”
Those allegations have not been proven, but they seem less implausible every day.
We do not have any reporting that implicates Michael Cohen in meetings with Russians as outlined in the dossier. However, recent revelations indicate his long-standing relationships with key Russian and Ukrainian interlocutors, and highlight his role in a previously hidden effort to build a Trump tower in Moscow. During the campaign, those efforts included email exchanges with Trump associate Felix Sater explicitly referring to getting Putin’s circle involved and helping Trump get elected.
It seems far-fetched that Christopher Steele would identify the relatively obscure Michael Cohen as the likely man to clean up after Manafort’s flame-out in August 2016 if it weren’t true, especially because that’s the role Cohen clearly plays for Trump in other areas. Steele got the name “Michael Cohen” from actual sources, not out of his imagination.
It is indeed strange that Trump doesn’t pay much of a price for his lack of family values nor for his obvious dishonesty about his behavior with women. After all, he clearly thought the Stormy Daniels story could hurt him or he wouldn’t have authorized a payment of $130,000 to silence her. Cohen wouldn’t have worked last week to get a temporary restraining order on her speaking out if he and Trump didn’t think her revelations could be damaging. But they’re probably wrong about that.
People know Trump is a cheater and a liar and a bully, and these things form the basis for his appeal with a lot of people. There are enough people who want to fly around in private jets and have sex with porn stars to give Trump some political inoculation. If this story has real legs, it’s more for what it reveals about Trump’s ability to brazenly lie and his strategies from dealing with crisis. If we can’t believe him about Stormy Daniels, and we surely cannot, then we have less reason to believe him about Russia.
“…he clearly thought the Stormy Daniels story could hurt him or he wouldn’t have authorized a payment of $130,000…”
I’m not so sure you’re taking the right line on this one Booman. I don’t think Trump gives a damn about being caught on this issue or any similar. I think this was an attempt to protect Trump against himself. $130K is quite literally chicken feed to all these characters and means about the same as the $1 I give my grandkids to lie down and shut their eyes for 15 minutes … I might add, it seems to have worked about as well, also.
I’m rapidly coming to the conclusion that Cohen is/was behind this without much, if any, conivance from Trump.
FWIW, I agree that this shows the way Cohen works.
Not sure the source, but I saw a headline that Cohen was bitching to friends that Trump hadn’t paid him back.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/05/politics/michael-cohen-stormy-daniels/index.html
OH yes!!! Those paragons of left and right centrist “news,” CNN and The Wall Street Journal.
I won’t give WSJ and its paywall any more money than it has already been able to steal, but here is the “news” that CNN posted:
Uhhh…which “friends?” Names, dates, places, etc.? YOU know…like reporting used to be?
Sheer clickbait.
Do a Google search for “Michael Cohen complained to friends he had not been reimbursed”. Page after page of reprints less than 24 hours after the line surfaced in the WSJ. None with any specific “friends'”names as far as I have the time to investigate. You want a picture of false news in action? There it is. Now it’s a “fact”…factoid, really…in the minds of millions of simpletons.
Nice work, WSJ.
And y’all claim to wonder why I distrust most of what I see in the mainstream media!!!
Get real.
AG
P.S. This does not in any way mean that I “support” Trump or anyone who works for him. They are all lying thieves as far as I am concerned.
As are their mainstream, UniParty opponents and the captive media.
It’s nothing but a shitfight.
Stay outta the way if you don’t want to be smeared with this shit. It’s hitting the fan more seriously with every passing day.
It’s gonna smell up the joint until the government is basically no longer inhabitable.
And then?
And then the ones with he strongest stomachs will win.
Watch
Downrated for the nihilism. If you’re going to dismiss reputable sources and just scream bullshit, then you’re not actually engaging in any actual debate about the topic.
maybe I should put nihilism under the ‘don’t be a prick’ rule.
I am sure there are many fine nihilists.
LOL. Good one.
Actually, there are.
They’re just no fun to be around.
Right; “unnamed sources” = “clickbait”/untrustworthy mainstream media. That’s how Nixon shrugged off The Washington Post and finished his second term.
You should quit, move to Florida and complain full time.
I’d bet you couldn’t link a single person here ever claiming to wonder that.
Because the reason has been glaringly obvious since, roughly, forever: you utterly lack the basic critical thinking/reading skills and knowledge base that make discernment and discrimination between credible and ludicrous possible. Which is how, for example, you could be an avowed 9/11 Troofer (or at least “Troofer-Curious/Credulous”).
You demonstrate that with every single numbingly repetitive thing you shit out here (e.g., see comment this replies to).
. . . (pretty sure I hold that power in my hand at this moment), but elected not to exercise that ability, deciding it was better to let this self-humiliation/self-discrediting of yours — and more to the point, the several worthwhile replies to it pointing that out — stay visible for “posterity”.
Right Wing religious spokes-liars gave Trump a “mulligan” for his affairs. They pretend to believe he changed from the old playboy to a decent human being, or they are willing to be hypocrites because they know he will never change.
Trump has lived his life doing what he wants with little or no regard for anyone but himself. He’s had someone to clean up his messes and do his dirtywork and take the blame for his constant failures.
But now there’s a trail of evidence, a path that Mueller and others can piece together. Everything Trump has been able to hide or anyone he has bought off is being revealed. While his blatant infidelities hold no water in regard to his presidency, they do show a pattern of deceit. If a man will cheat on every wife, if a man will stiff those who work for him, if a man will lie with ease and bravado, then he will eventually be caught. And let’s hope he is caught and held accountable for once.
Right Wing religious spokes-liars gave Trump a “mulligan” for his affairs.
I’m old enough to remember Jim and Tammy-Faye Bakker. Right-wing religious leaders have always been frauds. I bet most of the men are partaking in affairs. Maybe ven multiple ones. It would be the least shocking thing to me if it became public that Joel Osteen was having affairs. It’s what they do. “Do what I say, not what i do.” They hold themselves to a different standard. Different from their congregations.
It’s a power play, a sense of being invincible with them, I think. And if they have a “Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven” mentality, then they figure they can be absolved of all their sins…if they get caught.
If the story has legs, and it probably does, it is possible that Trump said some things to Stormy that could hurt him in the investigation of today. Their arrangement went on quite awhile.
Stormy will not let it die. She currently is doing a tour of strip clubs called Make American Horny Again. She was getting $75,000 a night. The girl is working it.
Wasn’t this the same Cohen who brought a secret message back from Moscow (or Ukraine) for Trump? I’ve lost my original source from at least a year or more back. If so, he woul definitely be on Mueller’s radar. I assume we would have heard if he’d been invited in for tea and a little chat with Mueller so either Cohen is not well enough connected to l’affaire Russe or Mueller is stitching him into the quilt through others’ testimony, But I seem to remember him as being a loud-mouth, bully type, the kind Trump likes. (Unless it’s some other Cohen.)
It was indeed Cohen tho walked the memo about how to handle the Ukraine issue, to benefit Russia, into the WH and delivered it to Flynn. One has to assume that he trusted Flynn enough to make the handoff which raises a flag.
The tactics that Cohen has used with Stormy do indeed demonstrate a willingness to put his own license on the line; his interactions with Sater, his emails to the Kremlin looking for aid on the Moscow Tower project point to a guy who’s not just a fixer but a player as well.
. . . “prurient attraction” to any subject that includes Trump’s penis or where it’s been.
None.
Repulsion, rather.
Though of course I can only speak for myself on that.