Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly.
He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all convictions, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
—snip—
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs
I do not like whores beonging to any of the 7+ sexes, nor do I like the corporate, cultural or political versions thereof. They are not to be trusted> Why? Because they will sell their most personal beliefs and belongings to the highest bidder.
Thank you for realizing that sexworkers are just people, like you and me.
It took some effort but i am always happy when someone lets go of their irrational preconceptions and harmful stigmas that cause damage to innocent people. Of course society wont change that easily, since there always will be a large part of it thats invested in pretending to be morally superior to others, for whatever reason, but its a small step forward.
P.S. And…no. I was not “drunk” at 2:15 PM on a Saturday morning/afternoon/brunch. I had worked a difficult 5 set gig the night before, come home late and taken a couple of hours to cool off, gone to sleep, awakened late in the morning and…having a daytime off until yet another difficult gig…settled in with my coffee and breakfast to see what you assholes were spewing.
Drunk on the evidence of a mistyping!!!???
You really are a mainstream DemRat, aren’t you.
No wonder you can’t beat the likes of Donald Trump!!!
Ah, who could blame you. It’s a bad time for the radical conservative movement. Given that you are a dedicated evangelist for Ron Paul, the imminent smashing of your Republican Party at the ballot box must be so painful.
But hey, you’ve gotten a lot out of your support for Trump. The Judiciary is in the middle of taking apart civil rights for everyone other than straight white males. It’s the moment you’ve thirsted for all these years.
Arthur, remember right after the Obergfell decision when you wrote that if Americans insisted on enforcements of same sex marriage rights, the Americans fighting for these civil rights would be the ones responsible when, not if, people with LGBTQ orientations were beaten in the streets and in their homes?
My God, that was a very exciting fantasy you spun back then. The fight to get Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court must cause you to mess your drawers on the regular.
P.S. A group…or perhaps better, a cadre…of people (or quite possibly bots) on this site have tried everything in their power to discourage criticism of the Democratic Party as it stands today. They automatically downrate such posts and have endlessly attacked several posters as liars, fools, pro-Trump trolls and/or spreaders of Russian propaganda. When effectively rebutted, they simply ignore the rebuttal and repeat the same attacks. These McCarthyite tactics are intended to exhaust the patience of the attacked posters and discourage others from reading or posting similar material. It has worked on a few posters, who have simply given up. It has not worked on me. I initially answered their attacks with attempts at reason. After realizing that this was a total waste of time, I have pretty much stopped replying to them. My comments and articles on this site are my replies. Read what I have to say; consider what they have to say and how it is said, and then make up your own minds. Thank you-AG
the following statement to many of my replies to your “standalone articles” (LOL!) and comments…for the benefit of new readers here. It applies to the comment this replies to as well:
–Mary McCarthy [tiniest of liberties taken to fit the present context]
Certainly applies to the comment this replies to, which is remarkable for the absence of a single true thing anywhere in it. Quite an “achievement”! How proud you must be!
Such a steady stream of lies defies individual refutation of all of them (or at least my time and patience to do so), so I’ll just point out several of the most obvious and egregious (and, of course, hilarious):
1. Latest in repetitive series of self-serving lies misrepresenting the motivations and reasons of your critics and the factual substance of those critiques (even though they’ve all been spelled out in detail):
. . . to discourage criticism of the Democratic Party as it stands today. They automatically downrate such posts . . .
If by “true” you mean “false” (absurdly so), then sure:
. . . everything that you said about the constant downrating from the nalbar/marduk twins and a few others because of statements regarding a lack of respect for the Democratic Party establishment as it now stands is quite true.
It is laughable that you can even pretend to yourself (unless it’s instead a conscious lie) that your criticism of Dems is the basis for criticism/downrates of your shit. You frequently make this bullshit claim. I’m not aware of a single instance where there was any evidence for it. (Seeing you run away from bazzz’s utterly reasonable request for specific examples of what you’re whining about, I won’t even bother with a similar challenge on this point. I know too well from past experience what to expect: irrelevant diversionary blather or [crickets].)
This is just another manifestation of your hideous, grotesque, reprehensible dishonesty (one I’ve pointed out before): lying about the reasons/motivations of your critics, despite the fact that we have explained, repeatedly, with crystal clarity, in exquisite detail, exactly what our reasons/motivations and the exact nature of our actual criticisms actually are . . . as I’ve done repeatedly ad nauseum and bazzz has been doing throughout this thread. You simply ignore all that and just make up some bullshit self-serving reason/motivation/alternative substance to save you bothering your pretty little head with the substantive criticism you were actually confronted with.
Seems very clear at this point that this is a very perverse and dishonest psychological defense mechanism to inoculate yourself from ever honestly examining what actually goes on here and your inescapable role in bringing about your earned pariah status here.
As long as you can pretend people’s criticisms of what you do here are about something completely other than what they’re actually about . . .
2.
When effectively rebutted . . .
Wait, excuse me just a sec [snork . . . snicker . . . ] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA [gasp for breath] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!!11!!!! [recovery breathing]
OK, where was I? Oh, yeah, right, “effectively rebutted” . . . oh, no . . . not again . . . hold on, gimme a sec . . . [snork . . . snicker . . . ] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!11!!!!!!!!! [gasping for air]
Oh, yeah, please do link to a single instance of you ever “effectively rebutt[ing]” even one of my factual refutations of your falsehoods, lies, and related grotesque dishonesty. Even just one, even just once! Obviously, this request will not be granted because it’s impossible. That has never happened.
3.
I initially answered their attacks with reason.
Wait, excuse me just a sec [snork . . . snicker . . . ] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA [gasp for breath] HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!!11!!!! [recovery breathing]
OK, where was I? Ah, fuck it, just re-read #2 — all applies equally here.
Very obviously, that is not my entire argument, nor even a significant part of it. As you already know very well.
But of course, you can’t let yourself actually address the actual argument because it’s already won. Has been for a very long time now. You lost the actual argument when you repeatedly lied, then ran away from factual refutation of your lies, either by not addressing the actual argument at all or by trying to bury it in completely unresponsive, irrelevant, diversionary blather. Again and again and again and again and . . . just as you’re doing here in this thread yet again.
So you attempt every diversion (regardless how pathetic . . . and man are they pathetic!) that you can come up with from the actual argument to try and cover up your continuous running away.
And your attempted diversions always fail. Just like this one failed.
And your lies just keep piling up and getting more desperate, as this newest one demonstrates powerfully.
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned
When night falls, they gather
On hill tops and ridge edges,
Black silhouettes outlined by
Star and moon light,
To ask, to plead,
Are we alone? Are we the only ones?
Their howls seek an answer,
A break of the silence.
But it’s fear that compels them,
Fear of the silence,
And fear of the answer.
Please forgive my incomplete education and let me know the author of these lines.
On a hike in Sierra Nevada, I met a woman with three llamas, a dog, and a wolf. All rescued animals. They were a most unlikely pack.
In the hottest part of the afternoon, we sat together in a shady spot by a creek. She was not a talkative person, but her care for the animals – and her joy in hiking the High Sierra, was marvelous.
However, I was left with the strong impression that the wolf was the smartest one of the bunch. Those eyes! Of course, I’m personifying, and my encounter was probably loaded with preconceptions from literature and film. But wow! What a creature!
Trump is signalling strongly as of Friday Night that he’s absolutely intending to do more than just fire Rosenstein, but “clean house” at the Justice Department.
“Just look at what is now being exposed in our Department of Justice and the FBI. Look at what’s going on. Look at what’s going on!
“I want to tell you, we have great people in the Department of Justice, we have great people. These are people, I really believe, you take a poll, I got to be at 95%,” Trump told rallygoers in Missouri. “But we had some real bad ones — you see what’s happened at the FBI, they’re all gone, they’re all gone, they’re all gone. But there’s a lingering stench and we’re going to get rid of that, too.”
That exchange prompted Leon Panetta to say that Trump “needs to be careful” because firing the Asst. Attorney General in order to order his replacement to fire Mueller or to suppress the investigation by refusing to permit Mueller to investigate any more, or bring any prosecutions of Trump’s family would be blatant obstruction of justice.
Which, of course, it would in any sane county. However, if it were fully litigated, I’m quite sure Trump’s crazed, and craven loyalists on the S.Ct. would back him up and rule that the President is a de facto dictator who cannot be prosecuted for any crime in office.
Fortunately, if he does this the Republicans will lose the Senate too. They’re going to lose the House either way it appears now.
So,hopefully, Trump never gets to conduct his Night of the Long Knives because if he fires Mueller, there will massive leaks of the Mueller report.
You can bet your ass he’s already thought of this situation and he’s not going to blindly let Trump just fire him and suppress all the evidence they’ve been gathering for all these months. He’s got to have a report already drafted and ready to go right now.
But, as events advance, he modifies that report and updates it to include further pieces of evidence he’s gathered from Cohen and Manafort’s cooperation. All that will leak out immediately.
The GOP will scream at Democrats that they didn’t think obstruction of justice warranted Bill Clinton’s impeachment since they didn’t vote for it, and these Republicans don’t think that Trump’s obstruction of justice does either. So there!
Democrats will argue that Trump’s behavior is what we are judging here, it’s not 1998! And on we go.
Whatever it is, its mom should have told it to stop slouching.
My dad called me this morning to let me know that one of Charles Grassley’s aides had to resign for sexual harassment
<Been</u> born.
Donald Trump.
The grandson of a whoremonger.
William Butler Yeats, 1919:
Pure prophecy.
AG
You seem to have a problem with sex work, is that correct?
Yes.
I do not like whores beonging to any of the 7+ sexes, nor do I like the corporate, cultural or political versions thereof. They are not to be trusted> Why? Because they will sell their most personal beliefs and belongings to the highest bidder.
Why do you ask?
AG
I suppose there are people who would think what you say makes sense, if they share some of the same hate and anger as you are filled with.
To me its another confirmation of the deep disrespect you radiate, while feeling entitled to being respected yourself.
Its a sad display of ugliness.
Also, none of your words seems to apply to the sex workers that i know.
If anything i consider them more knowledgeable and honest on average than you are.
Great.
Keep on with the good company.
AZ
Thank you for realizing that sexworkers are just people, like you and me.
It took some effort but i am always happy when someone lets go of their irrational preconceptions and harmful stigmas that cause damage to innocent people. Of course society wont change that easily, since there always will be a large part of it thats invested in pretending to be morally superior to others, for whatever reason, but its a small step forward.
The ‘G’ key and the ‘Z’ key aren’t anywhere near each other — how did you mistype your own initials?
Why do you ask?
AG
Trying to figure out if you were drunk.
Why do you want to know?
AG
Because it would explain some of the idiocy.
Oh.
Thank you.
You convict yourself.
AG
P.S. And…no. I was not “drunk” at 2:15 PM on a Saturday morning/afternoon/brunch. I had worked a difficult 5 set gig the night before, come home late and taken a couple of hours to cool off, gone to sleep, awakened late in the morning and…having a daytime off until yet another difficult gig…settled in with my coffee and breakfast to see what you assholes were spewing.
You really are a mainstream DemRat, aren’t you.
No wonder you can’t beat the likes of Donald Trump!!!
WTFU!!!
AG (STYNPWXYZVNGTRSWAVNBJIUUYRTD)
Feeling tense these days, Arthur?
Ah, who could blame you. It’s a bad time for the radical conservative movement. Given that you are a dedicated evangelist for Ron Paul, the imminent smashing of your Republican Party at the ballot box must be so painful.
But hey, you’ve gotten a lot out of your support for Trump. The Judiciary is in the middle of taking apart civil rights for everyone other than straight white males. It’s the moment you’ve thirsted for all these years.
Arthur, remember right after the Obergfell decision when you wrote that if Americans insisted on enforcements of same sex marriage rights, the Americans fighting for these civil rights would be the ones responsible when, not if, people with LGBTQ orientations were beaten in the streets and in their homes?
My God, that was a very exciting fantasy you spun back then. The fight to get Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court must cause you to mess your drawers on the regular.
I never “mess my drawers,” fool.
That’s where I keep my socks!!!
AG
P.S. A group…or perhaps better, a cadre…of people (or quite possibly bots) on this site have tried everything in their power to discourage criticism of the Democratic Party as it stands today. They automatically downrate such posts and have endlessly attacked several posters as liars, fools, pro-Trump trolls and/or spreaders of Russian propaganda. When effectively rebutted, they simply ignore the rebuttal and repeat the same attacks. These McCarthyite tactics are intended to exhaust the patience of the attacked posters and discourage others from reading or posting similar material. It has worked on a few posters, who have simply given up. It has not worked on me. I initially answered their attacks with attempts at reason. After realizing that this was a total waste of time, I have pretty much stopped replying to them. My comments and articles on this site are my replies. Read what I have to say; consider what they have to say and how it is said, and then make up your own minds. Thank you-AG
wah wah wah wah
WATB
the following statement to many of my replies to your “standalone articles” (LOL!) and comments…for the benefit of new readers here. It applies to the comment this replies to as well:
*[ref.]
Your entire “argument”:
Eloquent.
Thank you.
With enemies like you, who needs friends?
AG
. . . gets you (as usual) the appropriate repetition of the already-supplied conclusive refutation:
This question is over the line.
If you think his questions and comments are idiotic, ignore them.
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned
When night falls, they gather
On hill tops and ridge edges,
Black silhouettes outlined by
Star and moon light,
To ask, to plead,
Are we alone? Are we the only ones?
Their howls seek an answer,
A break of the silence.
But it’s fear that compels them,
Fear of the silence,
And fear of the answer.
Please forgive my incomplete education and let me know the author of these lines.
On a hike in Sierra Nevada, I met a woman with three llamas, a dog, and a wolf. All rescued animals. They were a most unlikely pack.
In the hottest part of the afternoon, we sat together in a shady spot by a creek. She was not a talkative person, but her care for the animals – and her joy in hiking the High Sierra, was marvelous.
However, I was left with the strong impression that the wolf was the smartest one of the bunch. Those eyes! Of course, I’m personifying, and my encounter was probably loaded with preconceptions from literature and film. But wow! What a creature!
Trump is signalling strongly as of Friday Night that he’s absolutely intending to do more than just fire Rosenstein, but “clean house” at the Justice Department.
That exchange prompted Leon Panetta to say that Trump “needs to be careful” because firing the Asst. Attorney General in order to order his replacement to fire Mueller or to suppress the investigation by refusing to permit Mueller to investigate any more, or bring any prosecutions of Trump’s family would be blatant obstruction of justice.
Which, of course, it would in any sane county. However, if it were fully litigated, I’m quite sure Trump’s crazed, and craven loyalists on the S.Ct. would back him up and rule that the President is a de facto dictator who cannot be prosecuted for any crime in office.
Fortunately, if he does this the Republicans will lose the Senate too. They’re going to lose the House either way it appears now.
So,hopefully, Trump never gets to conduct his Night of the Long Knives because if he fires Mueller, there will massive leaks of the Mueller report.
You can bet your ass he’s already thought of this situation and he’s not going to blindly let Trump just fire him and suppress all the evidence they’ve been gathering for all these months. He’s got to have a report already drafted and ready to go right now.
But, as events advance, he modifies that report and updates it to include further pieces of evidence he’s gathered from Cohen and Manafort’s cooperation. All that will leak out immediately.
The GOP will scream at Democrats that they didn’t think obstruction of justice warranted Bill Clinton’s impeachment since they didn’t vote for it, and these Republicans don’t think that Trump’s obstruction of justice does either. So there!
Democrats will argue that Trump’s behavior is what we are judging here, it’s not 1998! And on we go.
Oh, cruel fate, to be thusly boned!
Ask not for whom the bone bones,
it bones for thee.
Snort!
Slouching towards Washington, surely?
My Irish heritage and literary taste has always drawn me to Yates.