This is a relatively minor example of hypocrisy, but it’s worth pointing out because we’re completely deluged with small examples of hypocrisy, and it all adds up over time to create a crisis of cynicism and lack of faith in our leaders.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday that the Senate would vote on the Green New Deal introduced last week by Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
“I’ve noted with great interest the Green New Deal, and we’re going to be voting on that in the Senate to give everybody an opportunity to go on record,” McConnell told reporters.
The bill, which is not expected to pass the GOP-dominated upper chamber, could force some Democrats to make a politically awkward calculation.
In case it’s not clear, the Senate Majority Leader intends to introduce a bill that is not expected to pass and that would not be signed by the president even if it did. The purpose is to put pressure on some Democratic senators to either vote ‘no’ and anger their base or vote ‘yes,’ and upset members of the business communities in their home states. Since the bill won’t become law, this is a thankless task for the Democrats. They won’t get much credit for supporting the bill, especially compared to the headache it might cause. Opposing the bill will put them in the dog house and get them a bunch of angry phone calls.
It’s a solid political play by Mitch McConnell, but remember that we just spend 35 days with the government partially shut down because McConnell kept arguing that it was a waste of time to debate a funding bill that the president would not sign. Here’s an example from January 3:
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday laid out the terms for taking up legislation to end the current government shutdown, saying his Republican-dominated chamber would not consider any bill President Donald Trump would refuse to sign.
“Let me say it again: The Senate will not take up any proposal that does not have a real chance of passing this chamber and getting a presidential signature,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.
Here’s an example from January 10:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked a vote on Democrat spending bills that would reopen parts of the government without a border wall, referring to the legislation as “political stunts.”
“The last thing we need to do right now is trade pointless—absolutely pointless—show votes back and forth across the aisle,” McConnell said on the floor Thursday, according to CNN. “The political stunts are not going to get us anywhere.”
Here’s an example from January 15:
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocked another House-passed spending package that would end the government shutdown, saying the Senate would not “participate in something that doesn’t lead to an outcome.”
He wouldn’t allow votes to reopen the government because they “didn’t have a real chance of passing” and were therefore “absolutely pointless show votes” and “political stunts” that would not “lead to an outcome.” Yet, that is precisely what he’s eager to do now with the New Green Deal proposal.
When our leaders are this cynical, it’s rational for the electorate to treat them with cynicism. To some degree, politics has always involved this kind of gamesmanship, but McConnell consistently takes things to such an extreme level that he’s fraying the fabric of the Republic.
He thinks it will hurt the dems that vote yes. I think he is wrong especially after last year and all the weather events. Only people that don’t see it are those too blind to see….
Those Democrats better line up and support the Green New Deal or else we need to get rid of them. This is a question of whether the human race survives or not, and they’re worried about what “business leaders” in their states might think?
Screw them if they’re not on board. We might as well learn right now who is useless baggage and who might want to save the existence of the human species amid millions of other species.
We are going to do this anyway: there is going to be a massive and desperate attempt to halt global warming, the only question is WHEN. Are we going to wait another decade until it’s too late? Are we going to pass useless palliatives to “study the problem” and kick the can down the road so we don’t have to take any tough decisions?
Or are we going to come out and tell the oil industry and Wall Street forthrightly “we are going to have to leave trillions of $ worth of oil and gas in the ground, because if we burn it our children will die in a global warming desert?”
Let’s find out who is going to help us survive and who is a worthless pant-load. This is great moment for Democratic Senators. They all need vote for this and let the right wingers complain “its too extreme!” Screw them. We can’t afford to listen to that nonsense.
Better be careful Mitch – your echo chamber could be a bit out of touch on this issue.
https://www.ecowatch.com/green-new-deal-voter-support-2623737355.html
Like background checks for guns and taxing the rich – this is a popular idea – supported by 64% of republicans polled.
“The Deal would generate 100% of the nation’s electricity from clean, renewable sources within the next 10 years; upgrade the nation’s energy grid, buildings, and transportation infrastructure; increase energy efficiency; invest in green technology research and development; and provide training for jobs in the new green economy.”
Ya think? (See esp. the first 3 ¶¶ of the second section.)
Couldn’t be deliberate, could it? Naw, never.
You said the Dems had the leverage on the shutdown, too, yet I read they already agreed to drop their demand for the bed limit.
I doubt the business community cares about show votes. They know the thing isn’t going to pass, so what do they have to worry? McConnell is being too cute by half here. This won’t even rate a blip on the radar.
McConnell is being too cute by half here. This won’t even rate a blip on the radar.
Yertle the Turtle is just straight up being a troll. He’s trying to jam people like Sinema since everyone already knows Manchin will vote with the GOP on this.
They caved. it’s what Pelosi led Democrats do.
As for the Green New Deal, you will have to convince me that it’s real and not a sham never intended to pass like the Employee Free Choice Act.
If this is what you guys consider a failure on the Democrat’s part, I’ll be happy to have a few more.
Sure they forced a complete capitulation on the funding bill and blocked Trump’s demands utterly but they didn’t force the symbolic concession on beds I just heard about 2 days ago!!! What good are they?
They also put this in:
“McConnell Reverses Himself”
NO HE DID NOT.
McConnell is for whatever makes Republicans have an advantage – it has NEVER changed for ANY reason.
. . . maintains his personal power, prerogatives, and privilege.
Markey had a good response.
Markey’s office responded with a statement chastising McConnell for threatening to call a vote on the resolution “without committee hearings, expert testimony, or a true national debate.”
https://www.wnyc.org/story/mcconnell-plans-to-bring-green-new-deal-to-senate-vote
https://www.wnyc.org/story/mcconnell-plans-to-bring-green-new-deal-to-senate-vote
I don’t agree with your premise. The planet is facing a serious threat and politicians have been kicking the can down the road for the last 40 years. Whether the Senate passes this or not, we need to have this debate, now, so that there is a well defined plan of action for the next president to push through.
Climate change is getting real and even rural, midwestern conservatives are taking notice. At this point, the only Democrat this could hurt is Joe Manchin, and he won’t face re-election until 2024. Sure McConnell is trying to be clever here, but I think he’s more concerned with tying the Republicans to the Koch brothers’ agenda than he is in tripping up Democrats.
So absolutely, put this up for a vote. Let this become the focus of some media attention so that we can swat down all the naysayer hot-takes, early. Reality is going to drive this issue and the party on the right side of it is going be the one to benefit in the future.