The Republicans usually surprise me by coming up with new ways to do appalling things, and part of trying to game out American politics involves making a real effort to anticipate things too awful to contemplate, like refusing to hold a hearing for a Supreme Court nominee because it’s an election year. On Thursday, I got a different kind of surprise when the House of Representatives voted unanimously, 420-0, to urge the public release of any report emanating from Robert Mueller’s Office of Special Counsel. Of course, there had to be holdouts, and Reps. Justin Amash of Michigan, Matt Gaetz of Florida, Paul Gosar of Arizona, and Tom Massie of Kentucky voted “present.” That still left folks like Reps. Steve King of Iowa, Jim Jordan or Ohio and Louie Gohmert who voted for it.
As the Wall Street Journal noted:
Republicans, who said they voted for the measure out of a belief in transparency, are operating against the backdrop of public support for a general release of the Mueller report. A CNN poll released last month found that 80% of Republicans and those who approve of the way the president is handling his job support publicly releasing the report.
It’s unclear to me why the vote came out this way. Yes, even partisan pro-Trump Republican voters overwhelmingly want to see the report, but that is a bit of a mystery in itself. Have they been convinced that it will exonerate their hero? Are they unconcerned with the potential consequences?
And then there’s the deeper question. Since when do Republicans yield to public opinion? They don’t care what the public thinks about background checks for gun purchases. They didn’t care what people thought about their stupid health care plan. They managed to vote for the first unpopular tax cut in recorded history. They often buck their own base to appease their most fervent supporters or their biggest donors. The president says that Mueller is engaged in the largest fraud, the biggest witch-hunt, and yet not a single member of the House was willing to say that they report is going to be garbage and shouldn’t see the light of day?
You can definitely go broke waiting for the Republicans to do the right thing because the public thinks they ought to, so why was this time so very different?
I really don’t know the answer to that, but the GOP is starting to get used to rebuking the president. They passed a joint resolution this week disapproving of his Yemen policy and the Senate is getting ready to back up the House in disapproving of his ludicrous and illegal national border emergency declaration.
I watched the GOP devolve for two many decades not to be jaded. I’m not holding out hope for better days. But this is a bit of a turn we’re seeing here. Trump is beginning to look a lot like a lame duck in only the third year of his first (and hopefully, only) term.
It is odd, no no votes.
One would have to assume that people ‘in the know’ know something of what the Muller Report will say. This odd vote makes me think the report is coming soon and that it will change things around, one way or the other.
My vote is that it will be bad for Trump and that the GOP may be starting the pivot away from the guy who drove off with their voters and has been setting everything on fire for the last 3 years.
Yes, bt1138!!!
My vote too.
They are voting in their own self-interest, and it no longer coincides with Trump’s self-interests.
‘Bout time!!!
AG
Yeah, 420-0? Makes me feel like maybe I am in a Twilight Zone episode. Up is down, left is right, in is out. Not sure what to make of it.
First the Yemen vote, then the 420-0 on Mueller.
Just now the Censure on the Emergency vote passed in the Senate.
Something is shifting in GOP-land…
Yeah, pretty sure the base thinks report will show no collusion by Trump.
Good question: why has McCarthy instructed them that this kabuki would advance their agenda or otherwise cover their @$$es? If it’s not clear what they have to gain, they certainly have nothing to lose:
BurrBorkBarr makes the decision whether to release, they’ll take no heat at all if he withholds; but mostly,If the report is released and members find certain unredacted passages embarrassing, why, that’s more material for their hysterical Deep State shticks.
I guess this vote suggests to me that they’ve been working on a strategy to “spin” a report to their advantage, and they think that such a strategy is within reach.
Meantime, I’ve been wondering about this piece.
They think they can win on this.
They might be right. They will be if obstruction is the biggest crime in the report. That’s not to dismiss the seriousness of what Trump has accomplished, but the public has been primed to expect far worse.
They passed a joint resolution this week disapproving of his Yemen policy and the Senate is getting ready to back up the House in disapproving of his ludicrous and illegal national border emergency declaration.
Notice the vote total in the Senate on that second one? No where near enough to override a certain Cheeto Mussolini veto. So the Senate GOP was just covering their asses. I wouldn’t count that as rebuking Trump. Come back when they votes aren’t pointless kabuki or the GOP is abandoning him in enough numbers to constantly override his vetoes.
I believe some of those republican votes, particularly from the more far right, Trumpist types, are because they truly believe the Mueller investigation is a witch hunt and the report will exonerate Trump once and for all. These are people who are not the bullshitters as much as they are sincere true believers in Trump, e.g. “Art of the Deal” is no myth to them.
You’re confused because you don’t watch Fox News saying “no collusion!” 24 hours a day. By now they are convinced that if the Mueller report does not include the phrase “President Trump is guilty of LOTS and LOTS of collusion” then that’s an exoneration for their Orange Mussolini.
What the report does say will be drowned in an endless series of cries “See! We told you! No collusion!”
They are nothing if not subtle. They are going to try and flip this on Democrats. Obviously that is not going to work, but what else can they do?
If they cover up the report that’s actually much worse for Trump than trying to spin whatever it does say. As long as it doesn’t call Trump “President Unindicted Co-conspirator”, which it won’t.
“They are nothing if not subtle.”
I think you mean, “There is nothing subtle about them.”
“They’re nothing if not subtle” means the exact opposite.
No, they’re being overly subtle. Too subtle for their own good in fact. It’s like when Bill Clinton said “it depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is.”
He was making a clever legal argument that was too subtle by half. Average people thought it was stupid. Senators are doing the same thing: “the court didn’t say collusion! So, no collusion was proved!”
Except that there was lots of collusion, and in fact the guilty verdicts and sentences are proof of collusion, witness tampering, perjury and obstruction of evidence.
The very fact that the GOP is railing against Michael Cohen “you’re a congenital liar! You don’t know what the truth is!” OH? Then why was he Trump’s lawyer for 10 years? “Mumble-mumble-something.”
By arguing “no collusion!” Senate Republicans are raising the aspect of collusion to the highest issue. Only it’s beyond clear that there is in fact a case of massive collusion, whether the Mueller report says so or not. That’s a loser argument in the end.
The only way to actually defend Trump would be to use the Reagan defense: “he’s so stupid and senile that he just didn’t know about Iran Contra.” IT worked. People generally gave Reagan the benefit of the doubt and he escaped impeachment.
Trump should have come out day 1 saying: “I was shocked! Shocked I tell you to learn that collusion was taking place!” Nixon at least tried that — to divorce himself from his criminal underlings, but he waited too long and it didn’t work.
Trump generally doesn’t care about criminality, and values personal loyalty over any other virtue. So, he sticks with the criminal henchmen even after they are convicted. That is a mistake, because he tars himself with their crimes.
The Fox News base doesn’t care but that locks Trump permanently into a 48%+ disapproval and 39% approval. He can’t break out no matter what else happens as long as he sticks with the script. And that is a losing prop bet for anybody.
All I can say is, you’ve got an interesting definition of subtlety.
In this leaky boat of an administration isn’t it likely that at least parts of the report would find their way out to public scrutiny?
Oh…that’s a guarantee!!!
Watch.
AG
Call me cynical, but it looks like a bunch of free votes for Republicans. For one, passing a resolution urging a public release of the Mueller report and passing a law to do that are two completely different things. I don’t expect Barr to pay any attention to what congress says and I bet a lot of Republicans have plenty of confidence in his ability to bury or minimize the damage from the report regardless of what they say publicly. It’s my feeling that he was hired by Trump because of his experience burying Iran Contra, and I believe he’s fully on team “R” and will do his best to support them. I know others feel that he’s a consummate professional who believes in the Justice department- but If that were true, I think that it is highly unlikely we would have auditioned for and then accepted the job. There is the theory that he’s really pulling one over on Trump, which I think is pretty long odds considering his history, but we shall see.
Similarly, the odds of congress actually overriding Trump’s veto of the emergency powers rejection are very low, so they can pretend to be standing up for the institution by voting for the rejection of the emergency declaration, while having no real impact on policy. It still will either be affirmed or rejected by the courts. However, it is amusing to listen to the Republicans do back-flips arguing about why they need to change the law to stop future presidents from using emergency declarations to re-direct funding but allow this one to go through… They would be much more honest if they just went ahead and said that restrictions on emergency declarations should only be applied to Democratic presidents.
That’s probably what they think, but the are in for a surprise. One way or another, Trump’s goose is cooked, whatever the pro-Trump contingent may think. The momentum will be unstoppable.
Really, come on folks, Mueller, a lifelong Republican, will not be holding our water. He will do everything he can to steer around Trump’s inner circle. He stops at R. Stone. He’s a Republican prosecutor. He wants them to continue to confirm right wing idealogue judges. That’s why this investigation is about to enter its third year.
Take your blinders off. Mueller ain’t gonna save us. And the fact hat the Democratic Party is relying on a lifelong Republican to save the country says a lot about this weak ass party.
This is getting old. the fact that Mueller is a prosecutor who has historically voted Republican does not ipso facto make him the equivalent of a GOP operative or politician. I’ve seen nothing to suggest anything of the kind. It’s ridiculous.
Unless he’s announced how he’s voted, we know nothing about how he voted. All we know about is his registration.
We also know during his whole time as SP he’s been on the receiving end of constant, coordinated attacks, attempts to discredit, and threats of firing — all by Republicans.
Indeed. To wit: “Mueller and his 17 angry democrats!”
Do you forget the C- Augustus years already?
One has to grant that these GOoP votes are rebukes of a sort, but very mild ones which will not alter a single National Trumpalist action to date. Given that there have so far been no such rebukes at even this feeble level, it’s something; but equivalent to a finger wag, or perhaps a stern letter.
The “transparency” question will actually be presented when Barr redacts every consequential sentence in the report—we’ll see what the Rebukin’ Repubs do then. With the Trumpian “VETO!!!”, his phony “emergency” is off to Roberts’ Repubs, after the lower courts all rule against the teenage tyrant.
I’m not sure 59 votes in the Senate disapproving of his Emergency Declaration is a rebuke. It looks to me like they went out of their way to signal they have no intention of overriding the veto. Overriding the veto? That would be a rebuke. 59 votes is dainty waving of a lacy white kerchief.