Our horribly mismanaged US auto makers want a $50 BILLION Bailout from US taxpayers like me and you:
Automakers plan to urge Congress to support funding up to $50 billion in low-interest loans over three years to help them modernize their assembly plants and develop next-generation fuel-efficient vehicles.
Industry officials said the loans, twice the amount authorized in last year’s energy bill, will be a top priority when Congress returns next month because of the declining fortunes of Detroit’s automakers and tightening credit markets.
“The amount of concern and urgency from the Detroit companies has increased in the last month and significantly ratcheted up what they’re communicating what their funding needs are,” said Alan Reuther, legislative director for the United Auto Workers union.
But before you write them a check for these monies, place a few conditions on any “loans” they receive:
1. No more outsourced jobs to Mexico or elsewhere. You get Federal money, you hire American workers. Violation of any of these terms and conditions would constitute an immediate default under the loans.
2. Let the rich bear some of the pain of this “investment” by raising taxes on millionaires to fund the bailout.
3. Give the labor unions and the Federal government veto power over any attempts to use money for anything other than R and D or development/production of alternative energy vehicles (like bonuses to executives who don’t deserve them, e.g.).
4. Put Federal Regulators or hire outside Financial consultants/CPA’s onsite as federal watchdogs to ensure proper use of the funds. Improper use of funds would constitute an immediate default of the loans.
5. Prohibit use of funds to pay dividends to shareholders, bonuses to executives, to buyback stock or to finance anything unrelated to the specific purpose for which the loans are being made.
6. Any default on the loans would immediately allow a sufficient number of the Board of Directors to control the defaulting company (whether that may require a simple or super-majority) to be replaced with directors acceptable to both the feds and labor unions until such time as the loans were repaid in full or the labor unions agreed to waive this requirement.
7. Require any default on the loans to annul any “golden parachutes” or other special compensation owed to management executives upon termination under their employment contracts at the discretion of the new Board of Directors (see #6 above) and require executives with such compensation provisions in their contracts to waive those agreements prior to receipt of any loan funds.
8. Require all Executive bonuses to be paid in stock options not executable until the loans are repaid in full, unless otherwise waived by a majority of both houses of Congress.
These are standard provisions a Venture Capitalist Firm would require before making an investment in a troubled company. I’m sure you can think of a few more terms and conditions, or other ideas, to make certain this form of corporate welfare doesn’t just benefit the corporate titans and investors on Wall Street, but actually goes to fund the purpose for which it is is intended. Feel free to add them in the thread below.
Yes, yes and yes!!
Detroit fought CAFE standards tooth and nail, and now they want a bail out? The next Congress had better get this right. Any money they MIGHT get had better come not with strings, but with rope.
Besides–those standards you listed are SOP that a venture capitalist firm would require. And aren’t “we” fond of saying that the government should be run like the private sector businesses and firms are run?
Here’s their shot.
So the “Welfare Gulfstream” replaces the so called “Welfare Cadillac”?
I call for a complete confession from GM regarding the murder of the EV1 along with the automakers’ proposals to immediately re-animate the product line, including a plan to acquire enhanced storage battery technology from the oil companies or whoever currently has control of it. Any corporation caught sequestering such technology to be summarily nationalized.
Of course, such dirty talk may make you insufficiently patriotic and stuff. Nationalizing corporations?! Oh. My. God.
Indianadem, why do you hate freedom?????
Heh. 🙂
I got a socialist leaning, that’s for sure! I think I came down with it many years ago when I was helping organize a public employee union local or maybe its because I grew up near Eugene Debs’ birthplace. I suppose saying Ceasar Chavez was and is one of my all-time heroes doesn’t help matters, either. Ya hear that NSA?!!
If you are an individual with a patent you can loose your rights by not bringing it to market. There are such provisions in our pathetic patent laws. Perhaps they could be applied to corporations for a change.
I would support monies to prevent line-workers from losing their pensions and other retirement benefits, but with the provisos that the money isn’t being used to maintain lavish management pay.
Excellent ideas.
Please Digg up
Why don’t we (the feds) just buy them? What’s their market cap?
They couldn’t be run any worse, and given today’s underemployment, there must be plenty of talent available to hire.
Then, when we’ve fixed them, we can hold a big IPO and double our investment.
All good conditions, but an “investment” is something you get a potential return on. Venture capital firm are not in the business of granting sub-market-rate loans. They take a share of ownership in the company. Bailouts like this are not policy, they’re speculation, except all the rewards go to the company, not the funder. The only way taxpayers should finance private business is as equity partners. Otherwise government should stay out of corporate business.
Looking at the issue more broadly, rescuing the auto industry, even if it worked, is not necessarily in the best long-term interests of the country. At the least, before any taxpayer “investment” we need verifiable analyses of the benefits that capital could produce by financing high-speed rail, much-improved public transportation, and a quick end to the petroleum economy.
We all know who this “investment” would benefit most. Any bill enabling the bailout should be attached to a provision that returns income and corporate tax rates back to pre-Reagan levels. Otherwise, no deal.
I live is S.E. Michigan as some of you know, so I can appreciate the dire straits our “Big Three” find themselves in. Part of the State of Mich. Teachers Pension Plan was loaned to Chrysler back twenty five or more years ago. The K car and the Minivan made them profitable again, and they promptly paid back the low interest loans. Now all three come begging this time. Looks like the Feds better start handing out numbers for “Free Market” Capitalists who need a “bailout”. Better access to capital is the way I have heard them put it. After the wall street bailouts way back in July, I can understand why the car people think their paltry $50 Billion request is slim pickins indeed.
While my own self interest does not want to see them go belly up, I can’t help feeling that this free market system is more like a one way street. I could be mistaken, but I do not recall profits being shared by them with all U.S. taxpayers in times of high auto sales. Did I miss something??
This “bailout” system can’t go on forever, and I note the snark in your use of “free market,” which really IS the take home point here, that this is not a free market. If it was, Bear Stearns would have gone belly up and havoc would have run amok in the markets. The They are preserving Their corner of the woods, and could care less about the plebs, until we can’t pay our bills and buy their corporate crap, including gasoline and heating oil.
Grrrr. I’d hate to single out Michigan and deny the people there the benefit of a “bailout,” but we can’t accept the spin that this is about the people of S.E. Michigan, it’s about saving the investments of a very very very small slice of the population — the investor class.
“Don’t believe the hype”
Chuck D
This “bailout” system can’t go on forever, and I note the snark in your use of “free market,” which really IS the take home point here, that this is not a free market. If it was, Bear Stearns would have gone belly up and havoc would have run amok in the markets.
There’s no such thing as a free market except in an economics textbook. It’s a mental construct that has as much relation to real world economics as the electron shell model does to particle physics – a useful construct for teaching, and a useful model for building more complex things on, but not really how the world operates.
Until we plebeians understand and internalize this, the patricians are just going to continue to use the rhetoric of “free market” economics to suck as much money out of us as they can.
Republican “free market economics” has always – ALWAYS – been a scam to demolish the political power of the Democratic-voting union bloc. That’s all. That’s what all of this encouragement of outsourcing and sending jobs overseas is as well – a way to demolish the political power of labor in our country. The unAmerican bastards would rather destroy our economy than let labor have an ounce of power. The fact that “free market economics” rhetoric also brings in the votes of economically clueless libertarians is a bonus, but not the primary reason that the Republicans have been systematically destroying our labor economy for the last 30 years.
across the universe.
Excellent set of conditions. It should be paid for with the windfall profits tax on the oil companies and a tax on millionaires. Obama has floated the idea of a tax on windfall oil profits. The oil companies have been in bed with the automakers forever so let them share again.
Are there any other corporate criminals that need bailing out? Is anybody making an honest dollar? Are any executives not skimming from bankrupt companies? Just wondering.
This is like one of your best blog posts ever. I shared it on FriendFeed and Social Median, about to post it to Strands too. Awesome.
how about changing #8 to say that there can be no executive bonuses for 4 years?
if they’re going to give this serious consideration…which l do not support…then part of the deal should be the closing of all the tax loopholes and off-shoring of operations and accounts.
even carl levin [d-mi]…who l’m certain would support such a bail-out…might agree:
the GAO is about to release a report that says about two-thirds of American corporations paid zero income taxes to Uncle Sam between 1998 and 2005.
An even higher percentage of foreign corporations avoided federal corporate taxes. At the same time, said the GAO, the firms had trillions of dollars in sales.
The study was requested by Democratic Sens. Carl Levin of Michigan and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota.
“It’s shameful that so many corporations make big profits and pay nothing to support our country,” Dorgan said
.
if they’re not contributing, why the hell should the little guy bail them out for being lousy at their jobs?
to big to fail, my ass.