Life is tough and it’s going to get a whole lot worse. The world’s population is rising dramatically just as climate change is acting to reduce food crops, and we are running out of traditional forms of energy. It don’t look good for humanity, folks:
As the world’s population looks set to grow to nearly 9 billion by 2040 from 7 billion now, and the number of middle-class consumers increases by 3 billion over the next 20 years, the demand for resources will rise exponentially.
[B]y 2030, the world will need at least 50 percent more food, 45 percent more energy and 30 percent more water, according to U.N. estimates, at a time when a changing environment is creating new limits to supply.
And if the world fails to tackle these problems, it risks condemning up to 3 billion people into poverty, the [UN] report said. […]
“The current global development model is unsustainable. To achieve sustainability, a transformation of the global economy is required,” the report said.
Fortunately, the legislature of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has the answer, and they aren’t waiting until all hell breaks loose in 20-30 years. They’ve made a decisive decision now to get our world back on the right path.
On Tuesday, the PA House decided it made sense to declare 2012 the “Year of the Bible”—and unanimously passed a resolution doing just that, 193-0.
You can read the whole resolution here. Now a certain communist, atheist fascist, Muslim, Kenyan Dictator and his brainwashed followers might think this is a violation of the US Constitution, but who cares what they think? The important thing is that Pennsylvania legislators saw the serious problems that exist in our world today and acted on them.
Sure its a non-binding resolution, and no it won’t feed the hungry or heal the sick or stop war or any of that other petty nonsense that so many political agitators on the left like to argue about, but it might just do the one thing that really matters: spur an interest in the Greatest Book ever written, and by encouraging Bible study, we might just be able to save the souls of millions of people, maybe even billions. Sure, they’ll suffer from poverty, disease and lack of food, but they’ll go to heaven when they die (likely sooner rather than later), and isn’t that all that matters?
I mean all that stuff about Jesus saying we should feed the hungry, minister to the sick, help the poor, love your neighbor and so on and and so forth, well that was all just stuff you can do if you’ve got the time to bother. Sort of like those extra assignments your teachers would give you if you wanted to earn some extra credit. It’s not like its really necessary or anything, cause as we all know salvation is handed out on a pass/fail basis.
So thanks to all you 193 members of the Pennsylvania House for recognizing that the proper response to the liberal pinko doomsayers and their “United Nations” conspirators is a good dose of that old time religion. You know, if we only make good Christians out of everyone everything will work out just fine. One hundred and ninety-three Pennsylvania politicians ought to know.
So go read your Bible boys and girls and save the planet in the process!
Life is tough and it’s going to get a whole lot worse. The world’s population is rising dramatically just as climate change is acting to reduce food crops, and we are running out of traditional forms of energy.
Life is actually getting better for everyone, on average, so I have more hope (faith?) than you seem to have.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo
The required technical fixes to the problems listed above are already known. The obstacles to their implementation are political, not technical. the question is whether we can start acting rationally instaed of like a troop of hairless monkeys. In this regard, your PA story does not bode well. Nevertheless, have faith! 🙂
pardon the pun, but this resolution is like manna from heaven to me. So many opportunities to make fun and harass people.
For example, I called the office of the guy that sponsored this piece of shit. It was hilarious to listen to the staff twist themselves into pretzels as I rattled off verse after verse from leviticus. “When do we round up the homosexuals and execute them? When do we shut down wal-mart for selling clothing of blended fabric? What will be the impact of banning GMOs on local companies like Genesys? What will be the impact of banning pork on our farmers? It looks like the representative has short hair and a clean shav: does he know this is clearly prohibited by the Bible? Does this mean I can kill Hindus now, the Bible says it’s a duty to kill anyone who has a different religion? Does the rep know that Jesus says we have to give everything we have to the poor? Has he given his salary away?”
She got flustered and said “well, yes he has.” “Really? The whole $100K+ salary?”
“He doesn’t make that much.”
“That’s not true and you know it. why are you bearing false witness? Don’t you know your ten commandments, and the penalty for breaking them?”
It’s usually good to guess “death” when answering what the Bible prescribes for a penalty.
never mind the fact that the Bible is not at all on the side of one man/one woman marriages. Many biblical characters had shit-tons of wives. Other times, women are forced to marry their rapist, after the rapist pays a fee to the victim’s father for damaging his property. Women can be married to invading soldiers.
So I guess i have to call back.
Hey, the phony leather cover of my St. James edition of the Bible will protect me from solar radiation if I fashion it into a hat of some sort.
“Year of the Bible” legistlation. Not long ago I read on Sen. Durbin’s website that he was co-sponsor of a bill declaring something to the effect; “mother’s milk is very healthy for their babies”. When I called this out as redundant/silly over at the orange blog, it disappeared from Durbin’s site within the week.
Seriously tho’, there’s no way I can see our planet supporting another 2 Billion people.
And just remember, life is precious and birth control is the culture of death, according to the forced birth fascists on the right. The more babies the better.
What morons.
The last time I looked, the usual liberal position was that reproduction is a human right and that legislation to limit births like China’s is a crime against humanity.
Just like involuntary sterilization.
If I recall correctly, both the UN and the Supremes have declared the existence of this right.
And a move to limit family size in India was the biggest beef people had with Indira Ghandi, too, back it her day.
Are you sure the most common liberal position is that much better than the pope’s, on this matter?
I don’t think so.