So, I was wondering what, if anything, my good friend Karl Rove is up to these days. I mean, he just had his fat ass handed to him in the midterms and I kind of assume he’s a little less popular…perhaps a little less influential. But, maybe not:
Since the November election, Rove has been promoting the contrarian idea that the Republicans lost their majorities in the House and Senate not because of Bush’s unpopularity or because voters turned against the Iraq war but because congressional Republicans didn’t sufficiently live up to their core ideals, such as a commitment to spending restraint, a muscular foreign policy, and strict ethics. In other words, associates say, Rove is arguing that the GOP lost control because congressional Republicans weren’t conservative enough.
White House insiders say Bush is counting on Rove, who is the president’s main political adviser and deputy chief of staff, to define “common ground” in dealing with the Democrats who now control Congress. In Rove’s view, that means the White House shouldn’t stray too far from the conservative base and should continue making policy from the political right–and not give too much ground to the Democrats. Rove argues privately that the Dems should also reach out to the White House and that Bush shouldn’t do most of the compromising. One of Rove’s theories is that the Democrats can be maneuvered into a series of difficult choices next year as they try to enact their legislative agenda and pass the federal budget.
The central choice, according to Rove, will be to cut spending or raise taxes. If congressional Democrats cut spending, their liberal base will be alienated. If they raise taxes, rank-and-file voters will be unhappy. GOP insiders suspect that Rove also had a big hand in distancing Bush from the Iraq Study Group because he believed the bipartisan panel was too critical of current Iraq policy. Rove, insiders say, believes that victory is still achievable and that Bush should pursue it as vigorously as he can. The president made those points at his news conference today.
Call me a crazy liberal, but that all sounds like really bad advice. I don’t know what Josh Bolten is telling the President, but if he is listening to Rove, it explains why is burying himself.
If I had the ear of the President I’d be telling him to emulate Clinton and triangulate. He’ll score more points by doing something popular among liberals and moderates than he will by bucking up an ever shrinking base. But, Bush seems intent on destroying himself. So I suppose he’ll continue to listen to Rove until the federal marshals arrive and remove him from office.
Yeah, no shit, there’s the understatement of the year. Although how much more “muscular” can you get after you’ve invaded and occupied a country on false pretenses? Maybe he’ll nuke Chinese sweatshops, Indian call centres and Mexican border towns, that would look real muscular and make Lou Dobbs happy too.
Incidentally, wasn’t an emphasis on individual liberties a core Republican ideal that Bush has flushed down the crapper too?
Imo: lest we forget, Rove does campaigning, not actual governance. The relationship between political campaigning & governmental policy is only as deep as the campaign is long.
What BushCo is & has always been, far as I can tell, is a manifestation of the same relationship: an appearance of governing ability has always been more important than the actual ability; the campaign continues riding the broad brush, while the candidate’s true functionality is kept obscure, lest the LCD be confused by nuance.
This is why Bush has governed primarily on the basis of public perception & why a malleable, ego-driven empty vessel like him was installed as Virtual CiC in the first place, a tabula rasa easy managed by a near sociopathic manure-flower (with more than an academic knowledge of homoerotic fantasy).
I don’t trust Rove to pull Bush out of their collective delusion as far as I could throw him (were I be willing to grease my palms in such a manner).
Bush is dumb and Rove is his court jester. When you’re five years old you blame your imaginary friend for making a mess of things. Either W is a five-year-old or his brain cells are fried, because Rove is doing what a 5 year-od does—blame some else..i.e. “Not me”.
The Iraq Study Group was/is W’s last chance to move forward. By distancing himself from this group, the blame for the Iraq War/and its aftermath is on his hands.
“War is over..if you want it.” John Lennon.
Note to Karl: That ship has sailed. Such a strategy may appease the base, but the base isn’t the problem here. You need to appeal to those beyond the narrow base. Lockstep unity of the party is history as longstanding Bush policy comes under increasing scrutiny from all sides. The days of the unilateral decider are done.
The problem of scrutiny is precisely why media control has been crucially important to this administration & why, now that Rove’s pasty grip is loosening, the White House seems confused. Without control of ‘the message’ they got nothin’.
Let me pull a little amusement out of the offal, please:
So the common ground is: we don’t like the Democrats & they don’t either ..?