More of this please:
My administration will do what it takes to restore our financial system; our recovery depends upon it. And so next week, Secretary Geithner will release a new strategy to get credit moving again — a strategy that will reflect the lessons of past mistakes while laying a foundation for the future.
But in order to restore our financial system, we’ve got to restore trust. And in order to restore trust, we’ve got to make certain that taxpayer funds are not subsidizing excessive compensation packages on Wall Street.
We all need to take responsibility. And this includes executives at major financial firms who turned to the American people, hat in hand, when they were in trouble, even as they paid themselves their customary lavish bonuses. As I said last week, that’s the height of irresponsibility. That’s shameful. And that’s exactly the kind of disregard for the costs and consequences of their actions that brought about this crisis: a culture of narrow self-interest and short-term gain at the expense of everything else.
This is America. We don’t disparage wealth. We don’t begrudge anybody for achieving success. And we believe that success should be rewarded. But what gets people upset — and rightfully so — are executives being rewarded for failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers.
For top executives to award themselves these kinds of compensation packages in the midst of this economic crisis is not only in bad taste — it’s a bad strategy — and I will not tolerate it as president. We’re going to be demanding some restraint in exchange for federal aid — so that when firms seek new federal dollars, we won’t find them up to the same old tricks.
As part of the reforms we are announcing today, top executives at firms receiving extraordinary help from U.S. taxpayers will have their compensation capped at $500,000 — a fraction of the salaries that have been reported recently. And if these executives receive any additional compensation, it will come in the form of stock that can’t be paid up until taxpayers are paid back for their assistance.
Companies receiving federal aid are going to have to disclose publicly all the perks and luxuries bestowed upon senior executives and provide an explanation to the taxpayers and to shareholders as to why these expenses are justified. And we’re putting a stop to these kinds of massive severance packages we’ve all read about with disgust; we’re taking the air out of the golden parachute.
We’re asking these firms to take responsibility, to recognize the nature of this crisis and their role in it. We believe that what we’ve laid out should be viewed as fair and embraced as basic common sense.
Finally, these guidelines we’re putting in place are only the beginning of a long-term effort. We’re going to examine the ways in which the means and manner of executive compensation have contributed to a reckless culture and quarter-by-quarter mentality that in turn have wrought havoc in our financial system. We’re going to be taking a look at broader reforms so that executives are compensated for sound risk management and rewarded for growth measured over years, not just days or weeks.
It may be common sense, but it is also a very significant (almost radical) move on President Obama’s part to limit executive pay for bailed out companies and to promise to regulate executive compensation in general. I don’t think the fat cats are winning the P.R. war.
I’m both vastly amused and deeply offended at the former CEO of Merrill-Lynch calling Obama’s call for responsibility as ‘unfair’.
Really, there seems to be no end to the balls on this guy—surely they’d be visible from another star, they’re that big and brassy..
One suspicion that I’m developing at this stage is that for con artists/grifters of this level of arrogance, pushing the ‘envelope’ this hard at this stage suggests he has skeletons in his closet that really need to be exposed. Who has/had promised him what, to make him so certain that he cannot be touched in his demands for entitlement?
If this BS compensation scheme is required for such “talent” then I’d hate to see what the price tag is for mere competence.
And may I say that whomever is providing their PR/Communication counsel needs to be cut as well. UNFAIR??? Are you kidding me? They paid someone to issue that statement? Dumb!
Either that, or someone is working on the inside to take down these idiots.
My first thought was, ‘oh darn, they won’t be able to make their mortgage payments’
Obama struck a rich vein, and he is going to mine it for all it’s worth. The Thugs in Congress and their fellow travelers in the MSM are going to have a hard time persuading the public that CEO’s of failing companies deserve to earn more than the POTUS. It’s different for people who actually own their companies; they took the risk and built them up. But CEO’s are hired hands. It’s not the same thing at all.
The big question here will be be what kinds of “alternative ways” do the corporations find to continue to compensate their elite upper management in outlandish and excessive ways while avoiding the surface transparency of moves such as this one undertaken by the Obama administration? And how much Congressional enabling will there be for such under-the-radar financial packages?
Money still rules. And the crew in Congress still kowtows to the ones with the cash. Time will tell here.
But I have my doubts.
Limited to only $500,000.00?!! When will the CEO’s personal nightmares end?!! Oh the humanity!!!
Boran, be nice! They may have to downgrade from the Wynn to the Bellagio during their next trip to Vegas.
This is so hard for them! Don’t tease them, OK? Bankers have feelings, too.
((Sniff)) How could you be so cold??????
there will now be much wailing and gnashing of teeth emanating from boardrooms across the country.
Actually, if he can push it through – and that’s a huge if – it’s that last paragraph that really has me excited. CEO bonuses during this bailout are a symbolic issue that will be mostly forgotten in six month. But changing the quarter-by-quarter (or in some cases, day-by-day or even hour-by-hour) mentality that has ruined countless industries that now answer to Wall Street into long-term management practices is as radical (and important) a proposal as DC has seen in a long while.
Limiting CEO pay to $500k while giving these same CEO’s hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars only makes Obama look like an asshole. I’m sorry.
How about firing all the executives and nationalizing the banks already? That might actually fix the problem.
Im’ with zandar.
i mean great, they get a salary cap. but i keep reading that the banks get to keep the profits if they’re solvent again. that’s an awful lot more than $500K.
where’s the return for the taxpayer on all this dough we’re forking over?
Geithner and Summers will kill themselves before that happens.
And here all these conservatives thought when Obama was talking about “sacrifice” it meant cutbacks to government “entitlement” programs like SCHIP, Medicare, Social Security, the VA…
Kudos to Bernie Saunders and Claire McCaskill for channeling populist outrage!
Some executives will take their cookies and quit before allowing their salaries to be cut to the bone like that… but that means the company can hire a strong up-and-coming senior manager who will take that salary, and be motivated to do what it takes to turn the company around.
I think some rules that allow stockholders to approve executive compensation packages would be good in the future too — a lot of stockholders may have no idea how the executives and board members get compensated in relation to the profits/loss and dividends that the stockholders actually receive. Executives who pursue policies that run the company into the ground or in need of financial bailouts don’t deserve millions in compensation.
Brendan and Zandar nailed it. If this “cap” comes with what has been rumored to be coming down the pike– i.e., the US buys the worst assets at something other than firesale prices, letting the banks keep their profits on the good stuff– then it is purely an optical illusion intended to assuage the pitchforks and torches crowd. Wouldn’t most of these executives be stockholders also? So that their pay would be limited to a paultry half million, but all the while the government pumps helium into their otherwise worthless stock? That is worse than pointless.
Dave Sirota of course, is claiming credit. But I honestly don’t know WHY it was reversed, was it pressure from groups? Was it the Sanders legislation (that did have some blogosphere imput)? Or was it just story after story about billion dollar executive bonuses?
Great PR move by Obama and the public will thank him for it. After reading this post, it could just be window dressing.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/02/obamas-executive-comp-proposals-closing.html