We currently have special ops in Iran doing whatever Bush wants them to do to hurt the Iranian regime. You know, the folks who didn’t attack us on 9/11. But when given the option of employing special ops forces to track down Osama bin Ladin, what did Bush do? Well, exactly what he has been doing:
Late last year, top Bush administration officials decided to take a step they had long resisted. They drafted a secret plan to make it easier for the Pentagon’s Special Operations forces to launch missions into the snow-capped mountains of Pakistan to capture or kill top leaders of Al Qaeda. […]
The new plan, outlined in a highly classified Pentagon order, was intended to eliminate some of those battles. And it was meant to pave a smoother path into the tribal areas for American commandos, who for years have bristled at what they see as Washington’s risk-averse attitude toward Special Operations missions inside Pakistan. They also argue that catching Mr. bin Laden will come only by capturing some of his senior lieutenants alive.
But more than six months later, the Special Operations forces are still waiting for the green light. The plan has been held up in Washington by the very disagreements it was meant to eliminate. A senior Defense Department official said there was “mounting frustration” in the Pentagon at the continued delay.
The story of how Al Qaeda, whose name is Arabic for “the base,” has gained a new haven is in part a story of American accommodation to President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan, whose advisers played down the terrorist threat. It is also a story of how the White House shifted its sights, beginning in 2002, from counterterrorism efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan to preparations for the war in Iraq.
And why exactly Republicans are stronger on matters of national security? 9/11 occurred on their watch. They bungled the war in Afghanistan and let the Taliban and Al Qaeda regain the former strength. They attacked a country (Iraq) that was no threat to us, and wasted billions of dollars degrading our military readiness and running up massive debts, while creating instability in the Middle East that contributed to crude oil prices in excess of $140 a barrel, two of the main reasons our economy is in the tank. They allowed North Korea to develop nukes. They failed to accept a deal with Iran in 2003 that would have ended Iran’s nuclear program and its support for Hamas and Hezbollah. And now they are using our special forces to provoke a war in Iran while refusing to go after the criminals that actually attacked our country.
Does any rational person see this record of failure as evidence of competence, much less a strength, when it comes to protecting America?
it’s a misguided attempt to protect a country, just not this country, combine with an effort to sustain Cold War level military/intelligence budgets in perpetuity, with more and more of that budget privatized.
In these things, they have been more successful than in their stated goals.
With these guys it’s always the obsession to return every threat to a state. As they formulated that AQ couldn’t possibly act w/o state sponsorship, and since you’ve seen one terrorist you’ve seen them all, hence the old enemy the
iraqi state could be brought in.
This is what mccain shares, cheney is obsessed w/nixon’s pullout and so is mc. They simply lack the understanding of this enemy and until they stop looking at AQ, Iran, Iraq through unfinished vietnam conflicts lens they will never see the writing on the wall.
It’s the Oil and gas in an attempt to block the Russians and Chinese.
First Iraq, then Iran. That was the agenda. Never mind that Iran was very helpful with Afghanistan right after 9/11, had offered help in 2003 that we spurned.
Guess what Iran has survived for centuries. Untold consequences said Robert Gates..”we’ll create generations of jihadists and our grandchildren will be battling our enemies here in America.”
Hmm. How come Israel, Pakistan and India violated the NPT, made bombs while Iran allows regular inspection of its facilities?
Pakistan is the most dangerous country.
The focus on Iran is misplaced. Give another three years and we’ll be bitten.
it’s more the…. or? in the heading,
it is an insurance policy for the elite no bid robber barons to insure longevity for their treasure rooms.
the hell with the consequences for the lower class’
“The Second Guilded Age”
I gather that your post is the result of your reading of the New Yorker article by Sy Hersh. I don’t doubt for one second that the info included in the article is right on target. I just hope Steven that you can add some additional sourcing in the near future. Mr Hershs’ record has been continuously proven to be on target yet “De Nile” appears to be all that the goopers have at their disposal.Thus the more varied the reports the better the chance will be that the story will become a popular media hot one.
What is now needed is for the story to develop legs.
Keep up the postings, at least until this administration attacks Iran.