[From the diaries by susanhu.] I want to update you on the Exxon/Mobil boycott that has been organized by about a dozen major environmental and scientific advocacy organizations. For those who want to see my diary on the initiation of this project, please CLICK HERE. For everyone else, read below.
Exxon/Mobil is the rock bottom company in an industry that as a whole is not so good. So there is a coalition of environmental and scientific groups that are targeting Exxon/Mobil for a boycott.
Why Exxon/Mobil? Here are some examples of what Exxon/Mobil does (excerpted from Truthout.org):
Despite making a record profit of $25 billion last year, ExxonMobil is still shirking payment of the full amount it owes fishermen and natives hurt by the Exxon Valdez oil spill sixteen years ago.
-ExxonMobil is the only oil company that’s still part of Arctic Power, the group lobbying Congress to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling. The rest bowed out due to public pressure.
– ExxonMobil has spent more than $15 million since 1998 to deny the existence of global warming by funding junk science groups to cloud the debate. BP, for example, not only admits we have a problem but is investing in solar energy research and selling real solar panels today to help deal with the problem.
Here is an update on what is going on. First, from SaveOurEnvironment.org:
The campaign is off to a great start! On the day of the launch, we held more than 50 news conferences in front of ExxonMobil gas stations around the country to raise awareness of ExxonMobil’s misdeeds and get the word out about the campaign.
The media responded well with an exclusive in the New York Times and a feature story about the campaign on NPRís Morning Edition the day of the launch.
Since the launch, there have been hundreds more stories about the campaign in newspapers and on radio and TV shows across the country.
In just the first two weeks of the campaign, more than 100,000 people sent letters to ExxonMobil CEO Lee Raymond telling him how they feel about the company’s policies and letting him know they won’t buy the company’s gas, invest in the companyís stock, or work for the company.
Let’s keep this going! First, tell the CEO of Exxon/Mobil that you are boycotting.
Then spread the word to the media. Here is a letter writing campaign from the Union of Concerned Scientists:
Will you help Exxpose Exxon even more by sending a Letter to the Editor of your local paper?
Letter to the Editor Instructions and Details
Information on how and to whom to submit a letter-to-the-editor is usually found right on the Letters Page in your paper. Many papers now accept letters via email. If you can’t find the information you need, simply call the paper and ask how to go about submitting a letter in response to a recently published article.
To increase the chances that your letter will be published, do the following:
* keep it under 200 words and stay focused on one or two main points you’d like to make;
* make it personal by talking about how Exxon’s policies impact you or someone you know;
* keep it local by referencing a recent article or opinion piece that appeared in the paper;
* be sure to include your name, address, and daytime phone number;
* submit the letter within the next few days, if possible; and
* whether or not your letter gets printed, send a copy to CEO Lee Raymond at Exxon Mobil Corporation, 5959 Las Colinas Boulevard, Irving, TX 75039-2298.
Key messages to put into your own words:
* ExxonMobil is making record-breaking profits because of high gasoline prices but refuses to invest that windfall in renewable energy, calling it “uneconomic.”
* Instead of using its record-breaking profits to move America toward a cleaner energy future, ExxonMobil is spending millions on junk science, lobbying, and advertisements to block meaningful action on global warming.
* ExxonMobil is content to keep America dependent on oil while reaping the financial benefits. The company’s president has said we “need to accept the reality” of America’s dependence on oil rather than undertake “expensive” steps trying to avoid it. It is ironic that one of America’s largest corporations shows so little faith in American ingenuity.
* ExxonMobil is making record-breaking profits because of high gasoline prices, but ExxonMobil continues to challenge the 1994 court ruling ordering the company to pay $4-$5 billion in punitive damages to fishermen and others injured by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.
* Because of ExxonMobil’s environmental policies, I’ve pledged not to buy the company’s gas, invest in the company, or work for the company. Readers interested in joining the campaign can sign up at www.ExxposeExxon.com.
I also want to give you some alternatives to Exxon/Mobil. Three oil companies, while still oil companies and thus inherently bad for the environment, stand out as being better than the rest of the pack. First there is Citgo. The main reason progressives are pushing this company is that they buy NO OIL WHATSOEVER from Saudi Arabia. They are strictly Venezuelan oil and are nationalized. So buying Citgo helps President Chavez, the popular and populist Venezuelan president that Bush hates so much. In addition to Citgo I can recommend BP and Chevron because overall their environmental records are far better than any other oil companies. Their records are NOT as good as they want you to believe. But they are still better than anyone else’s. So please patronize Citgo, Chevron, and/or BP over Exxon/Mobil.
Finally, for those who want to take the next step in reducing oil use, join the nationwide eRideshare network and start carpooling.
Done, Exxon free!
Thanks for the promotion to the front page! I’m honored.
You guys think they’ve still got the rude one I sent right after Valdez? I’ve been boycotting them for 16 years now- maybe I should remind them…
Definitely remind them. And let your local media know. Every little bit helps!
I haven’t bought fuel at Exxon stations since the Valdez spill. But for me this is mainly a symbolic gesture, since virtually all fuels from the major oil companies are combined with each other either by pipeline or in the bulk terminals. This means that Exxon/Mobil could bring in 100 million gallons of crude from Saudi Arabia, and that oil would be combined with other oil from other producers and pipelined to any number of different refineries, not just those owned by Exxon/Mobil.
Certainly, boycotting Exxon owned service stations, (rather than stations franchised to individual operators), will have some impact on Exxon. But it doesn’t seem likely Exxon’s bottom line is going to be much affected by such actions since the oil they pump out of the ground and refine routinely goes to other name brand stations too.
Here’s a link to a good article explaining this further. I had found some other very informative articles on this same subject a while back but I haven’t managed to locate them yet on my computer.
Yes and no. Boycotts work if they are targeted and fairly large. Public outcry started by Barbara Boxer against the Arctic drilling plan got all major oil companies EXCEPT Exxon/Mobil to pull out of the public lobbying group that was pushing for drilling. Doesn’t mean all those other companies aren’t pushing for it in a back room, but public outcry made them back off somewhat. So oil companies care about their image. Chevron and Shell have done a lot of good environmental actions as a way of cleaning up their image. Chevron seems to make it genuine policy and Shell merely window dressing, but still, public outcry got them to act more responsibly.
So it will have an effect if we push. Of course if we don’t push the issue, then we won’t have any effect at all. But boycotts, letter writing and media exposure get the job done.
Actually most of the big oil companies that pulled out of “Arctic Power” pulled out because they realized that even the most optimistic estimate of oil at ANWR was not really worth the risk, both because of the cost of extraction and because the amount of oil purported to be there was not enough to bother with. Even if the GOP manages to pass the legislation that opens up ANWR, it’s unlikely that any oil company, big or small, will actually pay money for a lease to drill there.
ANWR was a wedge for big oil to use as a way of opening the door for offshore drilling in S. Calif. and the Florida coast where there are proven oil reserves that dwarf the ANWR estimates. Public pressure did help influence big oil to withdraw from the ANWR lobbying group because ANWR was so controversial, and to that extent the oil companies were concerned about their image, because they knew that when they did start to pursue their real goal of offshore drilling that they would need more people tt “like” them.
I’m with you completely that public pressure is a powerful tool to use to thwart the depradations of the greedy. I am a bigtime LTE writer, and I manage to get an average of 20-30 letters per year in print on a wide range of topics. (I’ve frequently written numerous letters criticising big oil for their rapacious greed, but only a couple of those ever made it into print).
Here’s one.
And here’s another.
My only point about the boycott is that if we think we’re mounting an effective boycott but in reality we’re not because we’ve been relying on false information as to how the system works, then we’re not accomplishing much.
If we could boycott refineries directly, that would be great, but there’s no viable mechanism for doing that. I’m for focusing on steady and strong pressure to make these greedy bastards look bad in the public arena as the primary method for us to influence them. The only way we might have any direct economic effect on them is by consuming less, not by consuming less from just those particular name brand vendors.
The UK has had a great campaign for several years … i think it’s StopESSO.org
We do not patronize Exxon. It’s a simple act to carry out. And so important.
While on the subject of ESSO, this is a fun site here.
(Move your cursor into the photo frame.)
I’ve boycotted Exxon since the Exxon-Valdiz spill in Alaska (1989). Nice to see ya’ll joining me!
I beat you all. I am one of the few Americans who has never had a car. Learned to drive but I have always used bus and bike (in Los Angeles) or subway (NYC) to get anywhere. Only time my wife and I buy gas is when we rent a car on a trip. And one time (visiting Los Angeles) we actually rented an electric car.
Our last trip was recent–couple months ago we drove down to NC for a wedding. We almost went to fumes avoiding Shell and Exxon. Finally filled up at a Citgo.
So maybe you all want to join me in giving up your cars except for occasional rentals? : -)
Ok, I can’t give it up completely, but I pledge to use the bike for those runs to the convenience store! How about it everybody?….
Is also good.
Keep in mind that my current subway ride is threatened with random inspections of our bags…violation of civil rights for the image of security.
I would bike now but NYC traffic is too much for me.