Indeed. And what is the Right-Wing Media Circus going to tell the American people about the wonders of the purple-finger election?
Prominent politicians also said in interviews that the delay in forming a government could force the assembly to take an extra half-year to write the permanent constitution, pushing the deadline for a first draft well beyond the original target date of Aug. 15…
The anger boiled over into a shouting match today and showed the fiery tensions that are rising as the main political parties fail to reach an agreement to form a coalition government, more than two months after Iraqi voters defied insurgent threats to vote in the first free elections here in a half-century.
And lest anyone think that the difficulty of forming a government is primarily ethnic or religious, the following makes clear that greed and mistrust are the driving factors:
“The negotiation regarding this is held up, is frozen,” he said.
The meeting of the Iraqi constitutional assembly intended to appoint a speaker today. They were unable to do so, primarily because the leading candidate, Sheik Ghazi al-Yawer, a Sunni, took his name out of the running. Another Sunni, Fawaz al-Jabar, may become the new leading candidate.
If there is one positive in all this, it is the continued recognition on the part of Sistani’s dominate faction, that efforts must be made to compromise and that the viability of a new government will depend on inclusiveness. Yet, the longer the formation of the government is delayed, the more problematic the roadmap, and the longer before we’ll see a draw down of U.S. troops in Iraq.
New York Times: Free Registration
Thanks for walking us through this, Booman…. I don’t often read stories about the new Iraqi government so appreciate your hand along the way. And here’s what Juan Cole had to report today (sans links):
Robert Worth reports that Shaikh Hareth al-Dhari of the Association of Muslim Scholars continues to reject Sunni Arab participation in the government as long as the US does not set a precise timetable for withdrawal from the country.
The Telegraph raises similar issues, but seems to me to answer them more pessimistically: “If Mr Pachachi is right, the development could signal a turning point in Iraq’s insurgency, which is dominated by Sunni Arabs. But Sunni scholars were quick to deny a change of heart. “The elections have changed nothing,” said Omar Ghalib, a member of the scholars. “It was an American rather than an Iraqi process.” He reiterated a demand for a two-year timetable for the withdrawal of American troops as a condition for not calling for a fresh boycott ahead of the December polls. ‘
kind of leader to step forward… one who isn’t afraid to crack a few eggs to make an omelet… one to step forward and provide a sense of patriotism and nationalism…one…who….never mind(using my best Emily Litella inflection).
Mar 29 – One day after Iraqi government bodyguards fired into a crowd of workers who were demanding full payment of their wages, an Iraqi cabinet member warned citizens against participating in public protests. Interior Minister Falah Al-Naqib said Sunday’s protest by workers at the Science and Technology Ministry, during which bodyguards for Minister Rashad Mandan Omar killed one demonstrator, was an effort to “destabilize” Iraq. He suggested that such events would invite large-scale terrorist attacks.
Hamid Balasem, an engineer at the Ministry, told reporters that about 50 guards who worked there were demonstrating because they had not been paid their full wages. Haithem Jassim, one of three people injured in the shooting, said, “We didn’t carry any weapons or have any intention of shooting, but the minister’s body guards started firing on us.”
–Chris Shumway, NewStandardNews.net
Whoever built in the requirement that to form a government required support of 2/3 of the representatives built in a nightmare. In most parliamentary systems 50% plus one is enough to form a government. Witness the rapid formation of new governments the world over!
Now who exactly wrote that 2/3 clause in?