There has some barely perceptible movement recently in Beto O’Rourke’s polling numbers which is causing some people to hope that an upset of Ted Cruz is in the works. The counter to that is that Sen. Cruz is pretty consistently reaching or topping 50 percent in the polls, including the Quinnipiac survey that came out today. There are very few undecided voters in Texas, apparently, so it’s going to be hard for O’Rourke to gain the remaining ground he needs to cover.
Yet, a look at the early vote in Texas provides at least a defensible reason to believe that the polls may not be modeling the electorate correctly, as the youth vote is absurdly high and Latinos are showing up in greater numbers than whites.
Hispanic voters in Texas have surged in early vote turnout by more than any other race/ethnicity, with a 214% increase. This is compared to a 165% increase among white voters.
— Tom Bonier (@tbonier) October 30, 2018
A 508 percent increase in voter turnout among the under-30 crowd is a clear indication that O’Rourke has captured the attention of a generational cohort that normally does not pay attention in non-presidential years. As for the Latino vote, it’s unclear how strongly they’ll prefer O’Rourke but he surely will benefit at least a little if they exceed their past participation levels.
There are some mixed messages in the early voting from other states. In North Carolina, younger voters are turning out at close to same rate they did in the 2016 presidential race, and that’s good news for the Democrats.
Was just asked by a reporter about the 'generational' cohorts aspects and especially for younger voters (i.e., Millennials and now Gen Z), so I pulled this chart of daily %s of Millennials in 2014 & 2016 & Mill/Gen Z in 2018 so far in NC's early voting periods. #ncpol #ncvotes pic.twitter.com/YhlVotSMA5
— Old North State Politics (@oldnorthstpol) October 30, 2018
In Florida, the Republicans are maintaining a stubborn lead in the early vote that should concern the Democratic Party.
FL Reps continue their slight and persistent lead in the #earlyvote. Although Scott won the 2014 governor election with a wider margin, the law has changed such that more people vote by mail. I would think Dems are nervous and race may be closer than the polls indicate. We'll see
— Michael McDonald (@ElectProject) October 30, 2018
In Nevada, things look as tight as a tick, but the Democrats are doing surprisingly well in Reno (Washoe County), and that may be enough to carry their statewide candidates over the top.
In all these cases, the results are based on party registration, so it matters a great deal whether there’s a differential in how many crossover votes there are, and it also could be critical who wins with non-affiliated voters.
While it’s true that the Democrats normally suffer in midterms because they have more low-propensity voters, that does not automatically mean that unusually high turnout this year will help them. In a red state, if we have presidential turnout numbers that will probably mean the Republican candidate will win. A Democrat has a better chance of winning in a red state when they can take advantage of a big differential in voter enthusiasm, so it doesn’t help if everyone turns out. Still, one way they could pull off some stunning upsets in places like Texas and Tennessee even in a very high turnout election is if the shape of the electorate is significantly different than it has been in the past. In Texas, much higher youth turnout and Latinos turning out at a higher rate than whites might accomplish this.
In Tennessee, turnout is certainly running high:
TN is running a bit below the *2016* #earlyvote level (it's way up over 2014) https://t.co/Lb9P1kU9sl
— Michael McDonald (@ElectProject) October 30, 2018
We’ll have to see if the shape of that electorate favors the Democrats.
Seems like NV is looking pretty good IMO, as their Heller “best case” in their model still has him down 2,000 votes, and I doubt that the unaffiliated voters prefer the GOP by 50-40.
“If they are at 90-5 with the bases and Heller is ahead by 50-40 with indies: He is losing by 2,000 votes, or half a percent.”
As proof I don’t comment here much, my signature was part of Chris Bowers’ attempts to “google-bomb” links for people trying to get info on John McCain in the ’08 election. LOL.
. . . there’s an option somewhere in your profile page, which that will take you to, to turn signature off or create a different one.
Remaining anachronism’s fine too, though, if that’s your pref!
It was nice to be jolted into a memory of a happier political time.
Well, it doesn’t look bad, but we shouldn’t be struggling to win in Nevada.
Against an incumbent senator in a barely purple state? Nevada was a reactionary red state until very recently and most of the state is still a lot like Wyoming. I live in Colorado which is somewhat similar. There are a lot of Mormons who think Trump was anointed by Jesus.
The urban areas are a different world, but not all Latinos will vote Democratic. It takes a lot of effort to get those votes despite Trump’s racism. And then there are turnout issues for Dems.
https://twitter.com/electionsmith/status/1057253463485304832
Take hate and the points. Hate doesn’t always win, but it reliably covers the spread.
That TN county chart is quite revealing. The turnout in Shelby Cointy (Memphis), which is strongly Dem, dwarfs the increases in Davidson County (Nashville) and Hamilton County (Chattanooga), which lean R. Unfortunately the chart cuts off at the bottom and loses Knox (Knoxville) and Williamson (suburban. Nashville) Counties, but what’s included I very encouraging.
I clicked on the Twitter link for Tre Hargett, and was able to see the counties that were cutoff, and more.
County 2018 2016 Change %
Knox 90,826 106,013 (15,187) (14.33)
Williamson 56,429 63,208 (6,779) (10.72)
Traditionally, republicans have higher numbers in early voting, democrats higher on election day. So if election day turnout levels are higher, then that is good news for democrats.
No one can predict what actually will happen; we won’t know until election day. But this is glass half empty, glass half full.
For now I’d rather be optimistic and see the glass half full, because if disaster comes, and pray that it doesn’t, there will be plenty of time for commiseration.
If we’re lucky…
Don’t want to sound overly dramatic or anything, but this election is a referendum on the soul of the country I love. I’m terrified.
I’d like to see some analysis of how early voting affects outcomes. It seems like it drives turn-out, increases the unfortunate “horse-race” aspects of reporting (further driving out “issues”) and, by giving a much longer time to vote, invigorates those voters who had somewhat soured on their “team” and might have stayed home if they hadn’t been consuming all the “We’re down at half time!” pep talks. I wonder if it doesn’t dampen wave possibilities in totally polarized electorates like ours, with almost no authentic “undecideds”. At the bare minimum it appears to be increasing turnout by all voters everywhere.
And does it help a garbageman like Canada Cruz or hurt him? “Conservatives” used to invariably oppose any and all attempts to make voting easier.
This analysis of early voting data suggests that young voters and non-white voters are surging:
https:/medium.com@tombonier/early-vote-data-shows-young-and-non-white-voter-turnout-surge-a160dc7a
9bb7
Sorry – this is a better link:
https://tinyurl.com/y8l4h5bp