1 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 248

Comments

  •  View post
  • "co-author" either, now, does it?
  •  View post
  • read/hear that stream of willful cluelessness and evasion and nevertheless conclude a vote for Trump is a thinkable act?
  •  View post
  • MacDonald had no scientific professional credentials that could even plausibly validate her political interference and science suppression:MacDonald graduated from University…
  •  View post
  • O/T: always liked that Frank Herbert quote for your signature line. Have read the Dune trilogy, but not that one.…
  •  View post
  • valid examples of what you describe. The one that most stuck with me, no doubt because I was directly involved…
  •  View post
  • "transition assistance"/displaced worker "re-training" programs, i.e., disappointing (and to nobody more than displaced workers who complete such programs and still…
  •  View post
  • Though you poo-poohed it, my disclaimer was sincere: haven't been there since, I think, '81. And I wasn't so tuned…
  •  View post
  • assertion, not Clinton, Booker, or even Romney (even if you're right about all three). So, sorry, but this response is…
  •  View post
  • kind of way. (It's long been my own inclination to accept people's self-identification, absent very clear-to-the-point-of-dispositive evidence to the contrary.)…
  •  View post
  • diagnosis, Dr./Sen. Frist.
  •  View post
  •  View post
  • RE: . . . super-rich liberals who would vote for Reagan over Sanders every single time."By what definitional stretch could…
  •  View post
  •  View post
  • Quite glaringly, in fact: Re: The most important point made... (none / 1) There you go again acting like:  …
  •  View post
  • no such compunctions! (And, yeah, if the shoe fits some of you here in this thread, well . . .…
  •  View post
  • to ignore that critical distinction (which Hillary actually made herownself, very clearly, in her statement) may have already passed merely…
  •  View post
  • the "journalistic"* malpractice kept it within election-stealing range. *"scare quotes" obligatory
  •  View post
  •  . . . throwing stuff to see what sticks since ['92, at the very latest]."
  •  View post
  •  . . . than we saw in 2000." I had the identical thought within the last day or two over…
  •  View post