priscianus jr

Comments

I guess I have to clarify: SNARK! and I hope yours was too.
•  View post
That's a good one.
•  View post
This is beginning to look more and more like the Obama/Hillary Clinton "inevitability" strategy last time around -- not good,…
•  View post
OT, but this is an interesting twist on your Donna Brazile piece the other day.
•  View post
So do I.
•  View post
Right.
•  View post
Yes, I also got the impression they were pretty senior. But the thing is, at the time they both disappeared…
•  View post
OK, you didn't exactly leave them out, you said "Democratic-leaning non voters." That's just another way of saying non voters…
•  View post
The huge demographic you left out is ... non voters. A lot of people don't vote because they don't believe…
•  View post
Anyhow, whether true or not, I don't see the parallel between that and what the same cohort would do if…
•  View post
I think you're right, and therefore a scale of "electability" at this very early point in the campaign is to…
•  View post
I've been here quite a while. It would have been hard for me to remember exactly how long but for…
•  View post
Look at it like this: He's making the best case he can. And it's pathetically weak. If he could make…
•  View post
All I can say is, you've got an interesting definition of subtlety.
•  View post
We also know during his whole time as SP he's been on the receiving end of constant, coordinated attacks, attempts…
•  View post
Good.
•  View post
This is getting old. the fact that Mueller is a prosecutor who has historically voted Republican does not ipso facto…
•  View post
That's probably what they think, but the are in for a surprise. One way or another, Trump's goose is cooked,…
•  View post
"They are nothing if not subtle." I think you mean, "There is nothing subtle about them." "They're nothing if not…
•  View post
That should have read "Pelosi's statements change NOTHING as far as Democratic strength."
•  View post