BlackBoxVoting.org has discovered yet more highly disturbing evidence that fair, verifiable elections in the U.S. are being systematically undermined at a national level through coordinated local  activity:

*Black Box Voting Exclusive:
NEW UNCERTIFIED DIEBOLD “VOTE REMOTE” PROGRAM —
Removing humans from the vote authentication
system allows election officials to set acceptance
for the ballots high, low, or anywhere they want.
This system is not certified. It interacts with
the voter registration system, which also contains
party affiliation of voters. It may never be tested
or certified, since it slips through a loophole in
the certification language. Financial documents
obtained by BLACK BOX VOTING show completed billings
for Vote Remote, indicating that it is already in use.

Here is a link to documents obtained by Black Box Voting.

VOTE REMOTE, for the most part, uses old technology like
automated envelope stuffing and bar coding. What is new,
though, is the use of automated signature comparison.

When you vote by mail, the signature on the envelope is
matched with the signature on your voter registration
card. Vote Remote automates this process. A thermometer-
like acceptance level can be set wherever the election
official wants to put it.

WE HAVE FOUND NO PROCEDURES, NO STANDARDS, NO
AUDITING TOOL FOR HOW ACCEPTANCE IS SET, BY WHOM,
OR EVEN WHETHER THE SYSTEM IS ACCURATE OR CONSISTENT.

A quick Google on “Vote by mail” will reveal that cookie-
cutter legislation has made its way into many states,
switching many counties to an all vote-by mail system.
Many of these mail-in voting bills have already passed.
(Just in time for Diebold.)

* * * *

Video: EXPERTS CONFIRM —
ELECTION OFFICIALS ARE AVOIDING SECURITY REPORTS

Ion Sancho and Dr. Doug Jones report what they’ve learned.
Ion Sancho is the Leon County elections official who
allowed Harri Hursti to test the security of his Diebold
system (Hursti quickly penetrated the system: See Hursti’s
report: http://www.blackboxvoting.org/BBVreport.pdf)
Sancho reports that the Florida Election Supervisors
meetings have not been covering the topic of security.

Dr. Doug Jones is the former Chair of the Iowa State
Voting Machine Examiners. He describes election officials
refusal to look at security reports.

Here is the 3 minute clip, taken by Kathleen Wynne:
http://www.bbvdocs/videos/security-obscurity2.mpg

* * * *

WE NEED YOUR HELP ON THIS MYSTERY

$20,450 was paid by Diebold to an obscure entity. This
is according to an “open payables” ledger from Diebold
(http://www.bbvdocs.org/diebold/accts-payable1.pdf).

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING IS A RESULT OF ORIGINAL
INVESTIGATIVE WORK BY BLACK BOX VOTING:

— Note that the same document shows a similarly coded
$144,000 payment to “Lottery Services of Georgia,”
a firm which has previously been found to be involved
in “pass through payments.” (Payments for which no
apparent work was done).

— The amount is similar to the amount paid to Juan
Andrade. That money turned out to be traveling through
ACG Group, LLC in Illinois/Ohio, and $10,000 of it made
its way through the Franklin County Elections Director
into the pockets of the Franklin County Republican Party.

— Another document shows that Diebold is working with a
Louisiana lobbyist, Darrell Hunt, who discovered was tied
into the bribery investigation of Senator Larry Bankston.

YOU CAN’T HAVE LARGE SCALE ELECTION FRAUD WITHOUT BRIBES.

Here is more information about the mechanics of bribery:
(http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/1954/8458.html)

In a nutshell, bribes are getting more elegant.
In the 1980s, they consisted of stuffing a wad of
cash into an envelope and handing it to a politician.
Nowadays, bribes tend to hide in gray areas of the
law, using clever ideas to slip through disclosure
nets. Like this:

— Politician buys fancy condo.
— Lobbyists fork out premium prices to “rent the condo,”
a week at a time.
— Check out a condo rental by the current Diebold guy,
Darrell W. Hunt, in Louisiana shortly before a senator
was convicted for using that condo as a conduit for
bribery.

DO YOU KNOW WHO THIS MIGHT BE?
The $20,450 to “‘DMJ Systems’ (Diodato, Ruben)” is
probably completely legitimate. However, we’ve not
been able to locate the identity of this vendor yet.
If anyone has a tip for us, we’re all ears.

* * * *

100 pages of Diebold documents were released by
Black Box Voting on July 22. On July 25, another
58 pages were released. All of these documents were
obtained through the original investigative work of
Black Box Voting investigator Kathleen Wynne.

Among them:

Urosevich son, emails about foreign investments:
http://www.bbvdocs.org/diebold/Urosevich–banking.pdf
(Bob Urosevich was the president of Diebold Election Systems)

A very pricey employment litigation matter in Canada
http://www.bbvdocs.org/diebold/employment–litigation.pdf

Smoking gun: Juan Andrade check stub
http://www.bbvdocs.org/diebold/Andrade.pdf
(Andrade has not filed the dicslosure documents on
expenditures and payments recieved, as required by law.
Fine for failure to file: $100 per day. Anyone want to
call the Chicago Trib about this?)

More documents, including sales strategy memos, a general
Ledger page and trial balance printouts are now posted
here:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/8541.html

Information on Diebold vendors (parts, staffing, more)
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/2197/8467.html

0 0 votes
Article Rating